Literature DB >> 26311179

Modulation of error-sensitivity during a prism adaptation task in people with cerebellar degeneration.

Ritsuko Hanajima1, Reza Shadmehr2, Shinya Ohminami3, Ryosuke Tsutsumi4, Yuichiro Shirota3, Takahiro Shimizu3, Nobuyuki Tanaka3, Yasuo Terao5, Shoji Tsuji5, Yoshikazu Ugawa6, Motoaki Uchimura7, Masato Inoue8, Shigeru Kitazawa9.   

Abstract

Cerebellar damage can profoundly impair human motor adaptation. For example, if reaching movements are perturbed abruptly, cerebellar damage impairs the ability to learn from the perturbation-induced errors. Interestingly, if the perturbation is imposed gradually over many trials, people with cerebellar damage may exhibit improved adaptation. However, this result is controversial, since the differential effects of gradual vs. abrupt protocols have not been observed in all studies. To examine this question, we recruited patients with pure cerebellar ataxia due to cerebellar cortical atrophy (n = 13) and asked them to reach to a target while viewing the scene through wedge prisms. The prisms were computer controlled, making it possible to impose the full perturbation abruptly in one trial, or build up the perturbation gradually over many trials. To control visual feedback, we employed shutter glasses that removed visual feedback during the reach, allowing us to measure trial-by-trial learning from error (termed error-sensitivity), and trial-by-trial decay of motor memory (termed forgetting). We found that the patients benefited significantly from the gradual protocol, improving their performance with respect to the abrupt protocol by exhibiting smaller errors during the exposure block, and producing larger aftereffects during the postexposure block. Trial-by-trial analysis suggested that this improvement was due to increased error-sensitivity in the gradual protocol. Therefore, cerebellar patients exhibited an improved ability to learn from error if they experienced those errors gradually. This improvement coincided with increased error-sensitivity and was present in both groups of subjects, suggesting that control of error-sensitivity may be spared despite cerebellar damage.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebellar cortex; cerebellum; degenerative ataxia

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26311179      PMCID: PMC4620141          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00145.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  50 in total

1.  Endpoint stiffness of the arm is directionally tuned to instability in the environment.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Gary Liaw; Theodore E Milner; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Spontaneous recovery of motor memory during saccade adaptation.

Authors:  Vincent Ethier; David S Zee; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Purkinje cell activity during motor learning.

Authors:  P F Gilbert; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-06-10       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Effects of delayed visual information on the rate and amount of prism adaptation in the human.

Authors:  S Kitazawa; T Kohno; T Uka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neuropathological and molecular studies of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6).

Authors:  H Sasaki; H Kojima; I Yabe; K Tashiro; T Hamada; H Sawa; H Hiraga; K Nagashima
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 17.088

Review 6.  Cerebellar long-term depression: characterization, signal transduction, and functional roles.

Authors:  M Ito
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Temporal firing patterns of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar ventral paraflocculus during ocular following responses in monkeys II. Complex spikes.

Authors:  Y Kobayashi; K Kawano; A Takemura; Y Inoue; T Kitama; H Gomi; M Kawato
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Dynamic modulation of cerebellar excitability for abrupt, but not gradual, visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  John E Schlerf; Joseph M Galea; Amy J Bastian; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Links from complex spikes to local plasticity and motor learning in the cerebellum of awake-behaving monkeys.

Authors:  Javier F Medina; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  16 in total

1.  Selective reward affects the rate of saccade adaptation.

Authors:  Yoshiko Kojima; Robijanto Soetedjo
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Learning to Predict and Control the Physics of Our Movements.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Estimating properties of the fast and slow adaptive processes during sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Scott T Albert; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Induced sensorimotor cortex plasticity remediates chronic treatment-resistant visual neglect.

Authors:  Jacinta O'Shea; Patrice Revol; Helena Cousijn; Jamie Near; Pierre Petitet; Sophie Jacquin-Courtois; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Gilles Rode; Yves Rossetti
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Visuomotor Adaptation Deficits in Patients with Essential Tremor.

Authors:  Laura Bindel; Christoph Mühlberg; Victoria Pfeiffer; Matthias Nitschke; Annekatrin Müller; Mirko Wegscheider; Jost-Julian Rumpf; Kirsten E Zeuner; Jos S Becktepe; Julius Welzel; Miriam Güthe; Joseph Classen; Elinor Tzvi
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.648

6.  Competition between parallel sensorimotor learning systems.

Authors:  Scott T Albert; Jihoon Jang; Shanaathanan Modchalingam; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Henriques; Gonzalo Lerner; Valeria Della-Maggiore; Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 8.713

7.  The effect of visual uncertainty on implicit motor adaptation.

Authors:  Jonathan S Tsay; Guy Avraham; Hyosub E Kim; Darius E Parvin; Zixuan Wang; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The cost of correcting for error during sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Ehsan Sedaghat-Nejad; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  An implicit memory of errors limits human sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Scott T Albert; Jihoon Jang; Hannah R Sheahan; Lonneke Teunissen; Koenraad Vandevoorde; David J Herzfeld; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-02-04

10.  Change in sensitivity to visual error in superior colliculus during saccade adaptation.

Authors:  Yoshiko Kojima; Robijanto Soetedjo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.