Renu Kundu1, Manu Rathee2. 1. Post Graduate Student, Department of Prosthodontics, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences , Rohtak, Haryana, India . 2. Senior Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences , Rohtak, Haryana, India .
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of Platelet-Rich-Plasma (PRP) and different implant surface topography on implant stability and bone levels around immediately loaded dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dental implants were placed in subjects divided into two groups and four subgroups on basis of implant treatment with PRP and implant surface topography used. A total of 30 implants were placed, 15 in each group. For PRP group, implants were placed after surface treatment with PRP. Temporization was done within two weeks and final prosthesis was given after three months. Implant stability was measured with Periotest at baseline, one month and three months. Bone height was measured on mesial & distal side on standardized IOPA x-rays. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was noticed in implant stability with PRP at baseline. The effect of PRP on bone height changes was not statistically significant. A synergistic effect of PRP and square thread-form was observed on improved implant stability and bone levels; however, no such effect is seen with PRP and reverse buttress thread-form. CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this study, enhancement on implant stability and bone healing was observed with PRP treated implant surfaces, and with use of implant with square thread-form.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of Platelet-Rich-Plasma (PRP) and different implant surface topography on implant stability and bone levels around immediately loaded dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dental implants were placed in subjects divided into two groups and four subgroups on basis of implant treatment with PRP and implant surface topography used. A total of 30 implants were placed, 15 in each group. For PRP group, implants were placed after surface treatment with PRP. Temporization was done within two weeks and final prosthesis was given after three months. Implant stability was measured with Periotest at baseline, one month and three months. Bone height was measured on mesial & distal side on standardized IOPA x-rays. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was noticed in implant stability with PRP at baseline. The effect of PRP on bone height changes was not statistically significant. A synergistic effect of PRP and square thread-form was observed on improved implant stability and bone levels; however, no such effect is seen with PRP and reverse buttress thread-form. CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this study, enhancement on implant stability and bone healing was observed with PRP treated implant surfaces, and with use of implant with square thread-form.
Authors: Blas Noguerol; Ricardo Muñoz; Francisco Mesa; Juan de Dios Luna; Francisco O'Valle Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.977
Authors: Francisco Mesa; Ricardo Muñoz; Blas Noguerol; Juan de Dios Luna; Pablo Galindo; Francisco O'Valle Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 5.977
Authors: Aleshba S Khan; Naauman Zaheer; Abdul M Zaigham; Maliha Shahbaz; Usman Zaheer; Mohammad Khursheed Alam Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2021-03-13 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Mazen Ahmad Almasri; K Sudhakara Reddy; Kamal D Hotchandani; Sahil Mogla; Kameswari Kondreddy; P I Nainan; Nandini Dayalan Journal: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Date: 2022-07-13