Literature DB >> 10149982

Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface.

J B Brunski1.   

Abstract

While it is known that dental implants can 'work'--the success of the Branemark 'osseointegrated' implant is a prime example--implants can also fail. The challenge is to develop a basic science understanding of all aspects which contribute to implant performance. In designing a successful dental implant, the main objective is to ensure that the implant can support biting forces and deliver them safely to interfacial tissues over the long term. Biomechanics are central in this design problem. Key topics include: (1) the nature of the biting forces on the implants; (2) how the biting forces are transferred to the interfacial tissues; (3) how the interfacial tissues react, biologically, to stress transfer conditions. For biting forces on dental implants, the basic problem is to determine the in-vivo loading components on implants in various prosthetic situations, e.g. for implants acting as single tooth replacements or as multiple supports for loaded bridgework. Significant progress has been made; several theoretical models have been presented for determining the partitioning of forces among dental implants supporting bridgework. However, more work will be needed to clarify how well these models match reality. Interfacial stress transfer and interfacial biology represent more difficult, interrelated problems. One problem is that the multitude of different shapes, sizes, materials, surgical sites and animal models for dental implants has precluded any generally accepted rules for biologically 'favorable' vs 'unfavorable' interfacial stress transfer conditions. While many engineering studies have shown that variables such as implant shape, elastic modulus, extent of bonding between implant and bone, etc., can affect the stress transfer conditions, the unresolved question is whether there is any biological significance to such differences. Recent research suggests that, at the very least, our search for a more detailed hypothesis regarding the relationship between interface mechanics and biology should take account of basic bone physiology, e.g. wound healing after implantation plus basic processes of bone modeling and remodeling.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10149982     DOI: 10.1016/0267-6605(92)90049-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Mater        ISSN: 0267-6605


  33 in total

1.  Peri-implant bone changes following tooth extraction, immediate placement and loading of implants in the edentulous maxilla.

Authors:  Lieven Barbier; Johan Abeloos; Calix De Clercq; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Fabrication and mechanical properties of PLA/HA composites: A study of in vitro degradation.

Authors:  J Russias; E Saiz; R K Nalla; K Gryn; R O Ritchie; A P Tomsia
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Biomim Supramol Syst       Date:  2006-09

3.  Clinical evaluation of anodized surface implants submitted to a counter torque of 25 ncm after 60 days of osseointegration: study in humans.

Authors:  Rafael Manfro; Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi; Vinícius Fabris; Carlos Nelson Elias; Vera Cavalcanti de Araújo
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-09-13

4.  No evidence to indicate topographic dependency on bone formation around cp titanium implants under masticatory loading.

Authors:  H Kawahara; H Aoki; H Koike; Y Soeda; D Kawahara; S Matsuda
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Delayed versus immediate loading of implants: survival analysis and risk factors for dental implant failure.

Authors:  Srinivas M Susarla; Sung-Kiang Chuang; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Template-guided vs. non-guided drilling in site preparation of dental implants.

Authors:  Uta Scherer; Marcus Stoetzer; Martin Ruecker; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Constantin von See
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Implant stability in different techniques of surgical sites preparation: an in vitro study.

Authors:  C Rastelli; G Falisi; R Gatto; M Galli; E Saccone; M Severino; C DI Paolo
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2014-12-27

8.  Effect of Platelet-Rich-Plasma (PRP) and Implant Surface Topography on Implant Stability and Bone.

Authors:  Renu Kundu; Manu Rathee
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-06-20

9.  Narrow ridge management with ridge splitting with piezotome for implant placement: report of 2 cases.

Authors:  Deepak Agrawal; Alka Sanjay Gupta; Vilas Newaskar; Amit Gupta; Subhash Garg; Deshraj Jain
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-11-25

10.  3D full-field strain in bone-implant and bone-tooth constructs and their morphological influential factors.

Authors:  Yuxiao Zhou; Chujie Gong; Mehran Hossaini-Zadeh; Jing Du
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.