Literature DB >> 26236542

Perceptions of Personalized Medicine in an Academic Health System: Educational Findings.

Allison Vorderstrasse1, Sara Huston Katsanis2, Mollie A Minear2, Nancy Yang3, Tejinder Rakhra-Burris4, Jason W Reeves4, Robert Cook-Deegan5, Geoffrey S Ginsburg4, Leigh Ann Simmons1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prior reports demonstrate that personalized medicine implementation in clinical care is lacking. Given the program focus at Duke University on personalized medicine, we assessed health care providers' perspectives on their preparation and educational needs to effectively integrate personalized medicine tools and applications into their clinical practices.
METHODS: Data from 78 health care providers who participated in a larger study of personalized and precision medicine at Duke University were analyzed using Qualtrics (descriptive statistics). Individuals age 18 years and older were recruited for the larger study through broad email contacts across the university and health system. All participants completed an online 35-question survey that was developed, pilot-tested, and administered by a team of interdisciplinary researchers and clinicians at the Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine.
RESULTS: Overall, providers reported being ill-equipped to implement personalized medicine in clinical practice. Many respondents identified educational resources as critical for strengthening personalized medicine implementation in both research and clinical practice. Responses did not differ significantly between specialists and primary providers or by years since completion of the medical degree.
CONCLUSIONS: Survey findings support prior calls for provider and patient education in personalized medicine. Respondents identified focus areas in training, education, and research for improving personalized medicine uptake. Given respondents' emphasis on educational needs, now may be an ideal time to address these needs in clinical training and public education programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  education; genomics; medical; patient education; personalized medicine

Year:  2015        PMID: 26236542      PMCID: PMC4520318          DOI: 10.5455/jcme.20150408050414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contemp Med Educ


  14 in total

Review 1.  A science of the individual: implications for a medical school curriculum.

Authors:  Barton Childs; Charles Wiener; David Valle
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.929

Review 2.  Genomic medicine: a decade of successes, challenges, and opportunities.

Authors:  Jeanette J McCarthy; Howard L McLeod; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 3.  Educating for personalized medicine: a perspective from oncology.

Authors:  D R Parkinson; J Ziegler
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Use of a patient-entered family health history tool with decision support in primary care: impact of identification of increased risk patients on genetic counseling attendance.

Authors:  Adam H Buchanan; Carol A Christianson; Tiffany Himmel; Karen P Powell; Astrid Agbaje; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Vincent C Henrich; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genomic medicine implementation: learning by example.

Authors:  Marc S Williams
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.908

6.  Implementation of genomic medicine in a health care delivery system: a value proposition?

Authors:  Joanne E Wade; David H Ledbetter; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.908

7.  Primary care physicians' knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  S B Haga; W Burke; G S Ginsburg; R Mills; R Agans
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  "Why do we have to learn this stuff?"--a new genetics for 21st century students.

Authors:  Rosemary J Redfield
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Perspectives on genetic and genomic technologies in an academic medical center: the duke experience.

Authors:  Sara Huston Katsanis; Mollie A Minear; Allison Vorderstrasse; Nancy Yang; Jason W Reeves; Tejinder Rakhra-Burris; Robert Cook-Deegan; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Leigh Ann Simmons
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2015-04-03

Review 10.  The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Omri Gottesman; Helena Kuivaniemi; Gerard Tromp; W Andrew Faucett; Rongling Li; Teri A Manolio; Saskia C Sanderson; Joseph Kannry; Randi Zinberg; Melissa A Basford; Murray Brilliant; David J Carey; Rex L Chisholm; Christopher G Chute; John J Connolly; David Crosslin; Joshua C Denny; Carlos J Gallego; Jonathan L Haines; Hakon Hakonarson; John Harley; Gail P Jarvik; Isaac Kohane; Iftikhar J Kullo; Eric B Larson; Catherine McCarty; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dan M Roden; Maureen E Smith; Erwin P Böttinger; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  2 in total

1.  Providers' perspectives on the clinical utility of pharmacogenomic testing in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Ina Liko; Yee Ming Lee; Danielle L Stutzman; Allison B Blackmer; Kimberly M Deininger; Ann M Reynolds; Christina L Aquilante
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.533

2.  Views on Precision Medicine among Health Professionals in Korea: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Ha Na Cho; Soo Yong Shin; Bin Hwangbo; Yoon Jung Chang; Juhee Cho; Sun Young Kong; Kui Son Choi; Eun Sook Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.759

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.