Literature DB >> 11705483

Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with a family history of breast cancer are at increased risk of the disease, but no study has been large enough to characterise reliably how, over women's lives, this risk is influenced by particular familial patterns of breast cancer. This report, on the relevance of breast cancer in first-degree relatives, is based on combined data from 52 epidemiological studies.
METHODS: Individual data on breast cancer in first-degree relatives (mothers, sisters, and daughters) of 58209 women with breast cancer and of 101986 controls were collected, checked, and analysed centrally. Risk ratios for breast cancer were calculated by conditional logistic regression, stratified by study, age, menopausal status, number of sisters, parity, and age when the first child was born. Breast-cancer incidence and mortality rates for particular family histories were calculated by applying age-specific risk ratios to breast-cancer rates typical for more-developed countries.
FINDINGS: Altogether 7496 (12.9%) women with breast cancer and 7438 (7.3%) controls reported that one or more first-degree relatives had a history of breast cancer: 12% of women with breast cancer had one affected relative and 1% had two or more. Risk ratios for breast cancer increased with increasing numbers of affected first-degree relatives: compared with women who had no affected relative, the ratios were 1.80 (99% CI 1.69-1.91), 2.93 (2.36-3.64), and 3.90 (2.03-7.49), respectively, for one, two, and three or more affected first-degree relatives (p<0.0001 each). The risk ratios were greatest at young ages, and for women of a given age, were greater the younger the relative was when diagnosed. The results did not differ substantially between women reporting an affected mother (9104) or sister (6386). Other factors, such as childbearing history, did not significantly alter the risk ratios associated with a family history of breast cancer. For women in more-developed countries with zero, one, or two affected first-degree relatives, the estimated cumulative incidence of breast cancer up to age 50 was 1.7%, 3.7%, and 8.0%, respectively; corresponding estimates for incidence up to age 80 were 7.8%, 13.3%, and 21.1%. Corresponding estimates for death from breast cancer up to age 80 were 2.3%, 4.2%, and 7.6%. The age when the relative was diagnosed had only a moderate effect on these estimates.
INTERPRETATION: Eight out of nine women who develop breast cancer do not have an affected mother, sister, or daughter. Although women who have first-degree relatives with a history of breast cancer are at increased risk of the disease, most will never develop breast cancer, and most who do will be aged over 50 when their cancer is diagnosed. In countries where breast cancer is common, the lifetime excess incidence of breast cancer is 5.5% for women with one affected first-degree relative and 13.3% for women with two.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11705483     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06524-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  341 in total

1.  Breast cancer knowledge and early detection among Hispanic women with a family history of breast cancer along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Authors:  Yelena Bird; John Moraros; Matthew P Banegas; Sasha King; Surasri Prapasiri; Beti Thompson
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-05

2.  Development and Evaluation of the Curriculum for BOLD (Bronx Oncology Living Daily) Healthy Living: a Diabetes Prevention and Control Program for Underserved Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Beth A Conlon; Michelle Kahan; Melissa Martinez; Kathleen Isaac; Amerigo Rossi; Rebecca Skyhart; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Alyson Moadel-Robblee
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Evaluating breast cancer risk projections for Hispanic women.

Authors:  Matthew P Banegas; Mitchell H Gail; Andrea LaCroix; Beti Thompson; Maria Elena Martinez; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Esther M John; F Allan Hubbell; Shagufta Yasmeen; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Early breast cancer.

Authors:  Tomoyoshi Suzuki; Masakazu Toi; Shigehira Saji; Kazumi Horiguchi; Tomoyuki Aruga; Eiji Suzuki; Shinichiro Horiguchi; Nobuaki Funata; Katsuyuki Karasawa; Noriko Kamata
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The effect of disease penetrance, family size, and age of onset on family history with application to setting eligibility criteria for genetic testing.

Authors:  Alexandre Sibert; David E Goldgar
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  CHEK2*1100delC and susceptibility to breast cancer: a collaborative analysis involving 10,860 breast cancer cases and 9,065 controls from 10 studies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  AGO Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer. Update 2011.

Authors:  Christoph Thomssen; Anton Scharl; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Mammographic breast density and breast cancer: evidence of a shared genetic basis.

Authors:  Jajini S Varghese; Deborah J Thompson; Kyriaki Michailidou; Sara Lindström; Clare Turnbull; Judith Brown; Jean Leyland; Ruth M L Warren; Robert N Luben; Ruth J Loos; Nicholas J Wareham; Johanna Rommens; Andrew D Paterson; Lisa J Martin; Celine M Vachon; Christopher G Scott; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Fergus J Couch; Carmel Apicella; Melissa C Southey; Jennifer Stone; Jingmei Li; Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Norman F Boyd; Per Hall; John L Hopper; Rulla M Tamimi; Nazneen Rahman; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Does thyroid dysfunction increase the risk of breast cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y Fang; L Yao; J Sun; R Yang; Y Chen; J Tian; K Yang; L Tian
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Breast cancer risk in older women: results from the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.

Authors:  Louise A Brinton; Llewellyn Smith; Gretchen L Gierach; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Sarah J Nyante; Mark E Sherman; Yikyung Park; Albert R Hollenbeck; Cher M Dallal
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.