Literature DB >> 25119055

Radiological outcomes of pinless navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Jerry Yongqiang Chen1, Pak Lin Chin2, Zongxian Li2, Andy Khye Soon Yew2, Darren Keng Jin Tay2, Shi-Lu Chia2, Ngai Nung Lo2, Seng Jin Yeo2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of pinless navigation (BrainLAB(®) VectorVision(®) Knee 2.5 Navigation System) as an intra-operative alignment guide in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The authors hypothesized that pinless navigation would reduce the proportion of outliers in conventional TKA, without a significant increase in the duration of surgery.
METHODS: Between 2011 and 2012, 100 patients scheduled for a unilateral primary TKA were randomized into two groups: pinless navigation and conventional surgery. All TKAs were performed with the surgical aim of achieving neutral coronal alignment with a 180° mechanical axis. The primary outcomes of this study were post-operative radiographic assessment of lower limb alignment using hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and components placement using coronal femoral-component angle (CFA) and coronal tibia-component angle (CTA).
RESULTS: There was a smaller proportion of outliers for HKA, CFA and CTA at 10, 2 and 2 % respectively, in the pinless navigation group, compared to 32, 16 and 16 %, respectively, in the conventional group (p = 0.013, p = 0.032 and p = 0.032, respectively). The mean CFA was also more accurate at 90° in the pinless navigation group compared to 91° in the conventional group (p = 0.002). There was no difference in the duration of surgery between the two groups (n.s.).
CONCLUSIONS: Pinless navigation improves lower limb alignment and components placement without a significant increase in the duration of surgery. The authors recommend the use of pinless navigation to verify the coronal alignments of conventional cutting blocks in TKA before the bone cuts are made. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Components placement; Mechanical axis; Pinless navigation; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25119055     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3226-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  27 in total

1.  Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies.

Authors:  Yaron S Brin; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Lawrence Joseph; David J Zukor; John Antoniou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine?

Authors:  Markus Tingart; Christian Lüring; Holger Bäthis; Johannes Beckmann; Joachim Grifka; Lars Perlick
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Randomized controlled trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pak Lin Chin; Leon Siang Shen Foo; Kuang Ying Yang; Seng Jin Yeo; Ngai Nung Lo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement.

Authors:  R S Jeffery; R W Morris; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

5.  Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai Bauwens; Gerrit Matthes; Michael Wich; Florian Gebhard; Beate Hanson; Axel Ekkernkamp; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Low incidence of postoperative complications due to pin placement in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard F Owens; Michael L Swank
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Evaluation of limb alignment, component positioning, and function in primary total knee arthroplasty using a pinless navigation technique compared with conventional methods.

Authors:  Brian J Keyes; David C Markel; Robert Michael Meneghini
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Does a modified gap-balancing technique result in medial-pivot knee kinematics in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty? A pilot study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Fitz; Sonal Sodha; William Reichmann; Tom Minas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Pin track induced fractures around computer-assisted TKA.

Authors:  J Beldame; P Boisrenoult; P Beaufils
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.256

10.  Less outliers in pinless navigation compared with conventional surgery in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Pak Lin Chin; Darren Keng Jin Tay; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of a novel handheld accelerometer-based navigation system and conventional instrument for performing distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xingquan Xu; Peilai Liu; Zhenfeng Yuan; Dawei Wang; Qunshan Lu; Zhe Zhang; Qing Jiang; Dongquan Shi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

2.  Fragility Index as a Measure of Randomized Clinical Trial Quality in Adult Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carl L Herndon; Kyle L McCormick; Anastasia Gazgalis; Elise C Bixby; Matthew M Levitsky; Alexander L Neuwirth
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-10-11

3.  Pinless Navigation in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sarah Keuntje-Perka; Philipp von Roth; Michael Worlicek; Matthias Koch; Volker Alt; Moritz Kaiser
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.