Literature DB >> 25114861

Immediate nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy reconstruction: An update on oncological and reconstruction techniques.

Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz1, Eduardo Montag1, José Roberto Filassi1, Rolf Gemperli1.   

Abstract

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is a safe technique in patients who are candidates for conservation breast surgery. However, there is worry concerning its oncological safety and surgical outcome in terms of postoperative complications. The authors reviewed the literature to evaluate the oncological safety, patient selection, surgical techniques, and also to identify the factors influencing postoperative outcome and complication rates. Patient selection and safety related to NSM are based on oncological and anatomical parameters. Among the main criteria, the oncological aspects include the clinical stage of breast cancer, tumor characteristics and location including small, peripherally located tumors, without multicentricity, or for prophylactic mastectomy. Surgical success depends on coordinated planning with the oncological surgeon and careful preoperative and intraoperative management. In general, the NSM reconstruction is related to autologous and alloplastic techniques and sometimes include contra-lateral breast surgery. Choice of reconstructive technique following NSM requires accurate consideration of various patient related factors, including: breast volume, degree of ptosis, areola size, clinical factors, and surgeon's experience. In addition, tumor related factors include dimension, location and proximity to the nipple-areola complex. Regardless of the fact that there is no unanimity concerning the appropriate technique, the criteria are determined by the surgeon's experience and the anatomical aspects of the breast. The positive aspects of the technique utilized should include low interference with the oncological treatment, reproducibility, and long-term results. Selected patients can have safe outcomes and therefore this may be a feasible option for early breast cancer management. However, available data demonstrates that NSM can be safely performed for breast cancer treatment in selected cases. Additional studies and longer follow-up are necessary to define consistent selection criteria for NSM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction; Complications; Nipple-sparing mastectomy; Oncoplastic surgery; Outcome; Silicone breast implants; Skin-sparing mastectomy; Tissue expanders

Year:  2014        PMID: 25114861      PMCID: PMC4127617          DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2218-4333


  108 in total

1.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcomes and technical refinements.

Authors:  Marzia Salgarello; Giuseppe Visconti; Liliana Barone-Adesi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Extended indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Markus Niemeyer; Stefan Paepke; Rainer Schmid; Birgit Plattner; Daniel Müller; Marion Kiechle
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  C Laronga; B Kemp; D Johnston; G L Robb; S E Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap?

Authors:  M A Schusterman; S S Kroll; M E Weldon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Nipple-areolar complex-sparing mastectomy: feasibility, patient selection, and technique.

Authors:  Gildy Babiera; Rache Simmons
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study.

Authors:  Risal Djohan; Earl Gage; James Gatherwright; Sabrina Pavri; Jimmy Firouz; Steven Bernard; Randall Yetman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Recipient vessel selection in immediate breast reconstruction with free abdominal tissue transfer after nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Sung Jun Yang; Jin Sup Eom; Taik Jong Lee; Sei Hyun Ahn; Byung Ho Son
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05-10

8.  A prospective assessment of surgical risk factors in 400 cases of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants to establish selection criteria.

Authors:  Leonie A E Woerdeman; J Joris Hage; Marjolein M I Hofland; Emiel J Th Rutgers
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  The lateral inframammary fold incision for nipple-sparing mastectomy: outcomes from over 50 immediate implant-based breast reconstructions.

Authors:  Keith M Blechman; Nolan S Karp; Chaya Levovitz; Amber A Guth; Deborah M Axelrod; Richard L Shapiro; Mihye Choi
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Scott L Spear; Catherine M Hannan; Shawna C Willey; Costanza Cocilovo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Anatomy relevant to conservative mastectomy.

Authors:  Rachel L O'Connell; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Sophocles H Voineskos; Simon G Frank; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

3.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Incisions for Cancer Extirpation Prospective Cohort Trial: Perfusion, Complications, and Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Odom; Rajiv P Parikh; Grace Um; Simone W Kantola; Amy E Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  An unusual presentation of Paget's disease of the nipple in a young woman: a case report.

Authors:  Junlian Liu; Zigang Zhao; Jinlian Zhou; Jianzhong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

5.  Treatment of Implant Exposure due to Skin Necroses after Skin Sparing Mastectomy: Initial Experiences Using a Not Selective Random Epigastric Flap.

Authors:  Estíbaliz Echazarreta-Gallego; Guillermo Pola-Bandrés; María Dolores Arribas-Del Amo; Ismael Gil-Romea; Ramón Sousa-Domínguez; Antonio Güemes-Sánchez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Breast reconstruction in the high-risk population: current review of the literature and practice guidelines.

Authors:  Margaret S Roubaud; Joseph N Carey; Emma Vartanian; Ketan M Patel
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

7.  Complications after breast reconstruction with alloplastic material in breast cancer patients submitted or not to post mastectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  Silvia Radwanski Stuart; Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Cristiane L G Chaves; Eduardo Montag; Thalita C S Cordeiro; Tatiana Taba Fuzisaki; Gustavo N Marta; Heloisa A Carvalho
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-09-30

Review 8.  One-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Concise Review.

Authors:  Nicolò Bertozzi; Marianna Pesce; Pierluigi Santi; Edoardo Raposio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  A Technique of Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Ji-Xiang Wu; Shan Guan
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 10.  Breast reconstruction after neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy: review and personal technique IDEAL concept REV-EJMR-D-15-00268.

Authors:  Carolin Nestle-Krämling; Edwin Bölke; Wilfried Budach; Christoph Andree
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.