Literature DB >> 23252505

The lateral inframammary fold incision for nipple-sparing mastectomy: outcomes from over 50 immediate implant-based breast reconstructions.

Keith M Blechman1, Nolan S Karp, Chaya Levovitz, Amber A Guth, Deborah M Axelrod, Richard L Shapiro, Mihye Choi.   

Abstract

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) as a therapeutic or prophylactic procedure for breast cancer is rapidly gaining popularity as the literature continues to support it safety. The lateral inframammary fold (IMF) approach provides adequate exposure and eliminates visible scars on the anterior surface of the breast, making this incision cosmetically superior to radial or periareolar approaches. We reviewed 55 consecutive NSMs performed through a lateral IMF incision with immediate implant-based reconstruction, with or without tissue expansion, between June 2008 and June 2011. Prior to incision, breasts were lightly infiltrated with dilute anesthetic solution with epinephrine. Sharp dissection, rather than electrocautery, was used as much as possible to minimize thermal injury to the mastectomy flap. When indicated, acellular dermal matrix was placed as an inferolateral sling. Subsequent fat grafting to correct contour deformities was performed in select patients. Three-dimensional (3D) photographs assessed changes in volume, antero-posterior projection, and ptosis. Mean patient age was 46 years, and mean follow-up time was 12 months. Twelve mastectomies (22%) were therapeutic, and the remaining 43 (78%) were prophylactic. Seven of the nine sentinel lymph node biopsies (including one axillary dissection) (78%) were performed through the lateral IMF incision without the need for a counter-incision. Acellular dermal matrix was used in 34 (62%) breasts. Average permanent implant volume was 416 cc (range 176-750 cc), and average fat grafting volume was 86 cc (range 10-177 cc). In one patient a positive intraoperative subareolar biopsy necessitated resection of the nipple-areola complex (NAC), and in two other patients NAC resection was performed at a subsequent procedure based on the final pathology report. Mastectomy flap necrosis, requiring operative debridement, occurred in two breasts (4%), both in the same patient. One of these breasts required a salvage latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap to complete the reconstruction. Three nipples (6%) required office debridement for partial necrosis and operative reconstruction later. No patient had complete nipple necrosis. No statistically significant differences existed between therapeutic and prophylactic mastectomies for developing partial skin and/or nipple necrosis (p = 0.35). Three episodes (5%) of cellulitis occurred, which responded to antibiotics without the need for explantation. Morphological outcomes using 3D scan measurements showed reconstructed breasts were larger, more projected, and less ptotic than the preoperative breasts (196 versus 248 cc, 80 versus 90 mm, 146 versus 134 mm, p < 0.01 for each parameter). Excellent results can be achieved with immediate implant-based reconstruction of NSM through a lateral IMF incision. NAC survival is reliable, and complication rates are low.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23252505     DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  10 in total

Review 1.  What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?

Authors:  Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Immediate nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy reconstruction: An update on oncological and reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Eduardo Montag; José Roberto Filassi; Rolf Gemperli
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

3.  Mastectomy Incision Design to Optimize Aesthetic Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Adi Maisel Lotan; Krystina C Tongson; Alice M Police; Wojciech Dec
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-09-24

4.  How to perform a NAC sparing mastectomy using an ADM and an implant.

Authors:  Gudjon Leifur Gunnarsson; Mikkel Børsen-Koch; Peter Wamberg; Jørn Bo Thomsen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-11

Review 5.  Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique.

Authors:  Uhi Toh; Miki Takenaka; Nobutaka Iwakuma; Yoshito Akagi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy through periareolar incision with immediate reconstruction.

Authors:  Se Hyun Paek; Seung Eun Hong; Kyong-Je Woo; Joohyun Woo; Woosung Lim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Implant-based immediate reconstruction in prophylactic mastectomy: is the caudal dermis flap a reliable alternative to synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix?

Authors:  N Heine; V Hoesl; S Seitz; L Prantl; V Brebant
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  Evidence based outcomes of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Nipple Sparing Mastectomy Registry.

Authors:  Sunny D Mitchell; Shawna C Willey; Peter Beitsch; Sheldon Feldman
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-06

Review 9.  The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 Procedures.

Authors:  Hannah Louise Headon; Abdul Kasem; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2016-07-20

10.  Comparison of Outcomes between Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy through Inframammary Fold Incision versus Noninframammary Fold Incision.

Authors:  Tai Suk Roh; Jae Yoon Kim; Bok Ki Jung; Joon Jeong; Sung Gwe Ahn; Young Seok Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.588

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.