Literature DB >> 22783529

Recipient vessel selection in immediate breast reconstruction with free abdominal tissue transfer after nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Sung Jun Yang1, Jin Sup Eom, Taik Jong Lee, Sei Hyun Ahn, Byung Ho Son.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is gaining popularity due to its superior aesthetic results. When reconstructing the breast with free abdominal tissue transfer, we must readdress the recipient vessel, because NSM can cause difficulty in access to the chest vessel.
METHODS: Between June 2006 and March 2011, a total of 92 women underwent NSM with free abdominal tissue transfer. A lateral oblique incision was used for the nipple-sparing mastectomy. For recipient vessels, the internal mammary vessels were chosen if the mastectomy flap did not block access to the vessels. If it did, the thoracodorsal vessels were used. Age, degree of breast ptosis, weight of the mastectomy specimen, and related complications of the internal mammary vessel group and the thoracodorsal vessel group were compared.
RESULTS: Thoracodorsal vessels were used as recipient vessels in 59 cases, and internal mammary vessels in 33 cases including 4 cases with perforators of the internal mammary vessels. Breast reconstruction was successful in all cases except one case involving a total flap failure, which was replaced by a silicone gel implant. The internal mammary group and the thoracodorsal group were similar in terms of age, height, breast weight, and degree of ptosis. The flap related complications such as flap loss and take-back operation rates were not significantly different between the two groups. The rate of nipple necrosis was higher in the internal mammary group.
CONCLUSIONS: The thoracodorsal vessels could produce comparable outcomes in breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomies. If access to internal mammary vessels is difficult, the thoracodorsal vessel can be a better choice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Free tissue flaps; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy

Year:  2012        PMID: 22783529      PMCID: PMC3385346          DOI: 10.5999/aps.2012.39.3.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Plast Surg        ISSN: 2234-6163


  22 in total

1.  Skin banking closure technique in immediate autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Eric C Liao; Brian I Labow; James W May
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Involvement of nipple and areola in early breast cancer.

Authors:  T Morimoto; K Komaki; K Inui; A Umemoto; H Yamamoto; K Harada; K Inoue
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Skin sparing mastectomy: anatomic and technical considerations.

Authors:  G W Carlson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  C Laronga; B Kemp; D Johnston; G L Robb; S E Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  TRAM flaps: a reconstructive option after bilateral nipple-sparing total mastectomy.

Authors:  Tuoc Ngoc Dao; Charles N Verheyden
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  An outcome analysis comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipient sites for microvascular breast reconstruction: a prospective study of 100 patients.

Authors:  Steven L Moran; Guillermina Nava; Amir B Behnam; Joseph M Serletti; Amir H Behnam
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Aesthetic outcome of different techniques of reconstruction following nipple-areola-preserving envelope mastectomy with immediate reconstruction.

Authors:  Afshin Mosahebi; Venkat Ramakrishnan; Mark Gittos; John Collier
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: a critical appraisal of the nipple-areola complex.

Authors:  Maurice Y Nahabedian; Theodore N Tsangaris
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Neoplastic involvement of nipple and skin flap in carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  U Wertheim; L Ozzello
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Can nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with modified extended latissimus dorsi muscular flap improve the cosmetic and functional outcome among patients with breast carcinoma?

Authors:  Adel Denewer; Omar Farouk
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.282

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?

Authors:  Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Immediate nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy reconstruction: An update on oncological and reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Eduardo Montag; José Roberto Filassi; Rolf Gemperli
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

3.  Primary Use of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Pedicle for Free-flap Phalloplasty: Rationale, Technique, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Nance Yuan; Edward C Ray; Shannon Smith; Maurice M Garcia
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 4.  Intraoperative venous congestion in free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps during breast reconstruction: A systematic review.

Authors:  Deok-Yeol Kim; Taik Jong Lee; Eun Key Kim; Jiyoung Yun; Jin Sup Eom
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 5.  Revisiting the internal mammaries as recipient vessels in breast reconstruction: considerations in current practice.

Authors:  Steven M Sultan; Amanda M Rizzo; Heather A Erhard; Teresa Benacquista; Katie E Weichman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 Procedures.

Authors:  Hannah Louise Headon; Abdul Kasem; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2016-07-20

7.  Examining Length of Hospital Stay after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation in a Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Jordan D Frey; Ara A Salibian; Nolan S Karp; Mihye Choi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-12-28

8.  The Role of Sharp Dissection in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Safe Procedure with No Necrosis of the Nipple-Areolar Complex.

Authors:  Ci-Qiu Yang; Fei Ji; Hong-Fei Gao; Liu-Lu Zhang; Mei Yang; Teng Zhu; Min-Yi Chen; Jie-Qing Li; Kun Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Skin-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Nipple Graft for Large, Ptotic Breast.

Authors:  Eun Key Kim; Jeong Mok Cho; Jong Won Lee
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.588

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.