Literature DB >> 33634005

Breast reconstruction in the high-risk population: current review of the literature and practice guidelines.

Margaret S Roubaud1, Joseph N Carey2, Emma Vartanian2, Ketan M Patel2.   

Abstract

Breast reconstruction is an important part of the cancer treatment paradigm and the psychosocial benefits are well described in the literature. Notably, breast reconstruction restores both the functional and emotional losses patients experience due to tumor resection. Post-cancer quality of life is an important benchmark of successful treatment; therefore, breast reconstruction is an essential component that should be offered whenever possible. Over time, reconstructive techniques and outcomes have improved dramatically resulting in better patient safety and decreased operative morbidity. When counseling a patient for surgery, the provider must consider all aspects of a patient's health. Ideally, breast cancer patients should be physically, emotionally, and oncologically appropriate candidates for reconstruction. However, in concerted effort to provide opportunities for as many patients as possible, the definition of who is a good candidate for reconstruction has evolved to include higher risk patients. These patients include those with advanced age, nicotine use, obesity, and significant ptosis. With improvements in surgical procedures and perioperative care, this population may also benefit from restorative surgery. However, the exact risk of complications and necessary counseling has gone largely undefined in this population. This article examines particular "high-risk" groups that may be challenging for extirpative and reconstructive surgeons and offers current guidelines for practice. 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-risk; breast; elderly; obese; ptotic; reconstruction; smoking

Year:  2021        PMID: 33634005      PMCID: PMC7882327          DOI: 10.21037/gs-2020-nfbr-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  60 in total

1.  Development and validation of a risk stratification model for immediate microvascular breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Mélissa Roy; Stephanie Sebastiampillai; Siba Haykal; Toni Zhong; Stefan O P Hofer; Anne C O'Neill
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Long-term evaluation of postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Bekka O Christensen; Jens Overgaard; Laura O Kettner; Tine Engberg Damsgaard
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 3.  The evils of nicotine: an evidence-based guide to smoking and plastic surgery.

Authors:  Brian Rinker
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study.

Authors:  M Morrow; S K Scott; H R Menck; T A Mustoe; D P Winchester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Sarah M Elswick; Christin A Harless; Sarah N Bishop; Cathy D Schleck; Jay Mandrekar; Ryan D Reusche; Robert W Mutter; Judy C Boughey; Steven R Jacobson; Valerie Lemaine
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  Patterns and outcomes of breast reconstruction in older women - A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  D D Oh; K Flitcroft; M E Brennan; A J Spillane
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  ASPS clinical practice guideline summary on breast reconstruction with expanders and implants.

Authors:  Amy Alderman; Karol Gutowski; Amy Ahuja; Diedra Gray
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Refinements of the LeJour vertical mammaplasty skin pattern for skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  J E Hunter; C M Malata
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Women Older Than 65 Years Versus Women Younger Than 65 Years: A Multi-Center Analysis.

Authors:  Diana Song; Karen Slater; Michael Papsdorf; Nancy Van Laeken; Toni Zhong; Alexes Hazen; Dale Vidal; Sheina A Macadam
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  Body mass index as a continuous predictor of outcomes after expander-implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Khang T Nguyen; Philip J Hanwright; John T Smetona; Elliot M Hirsch; Akhil K Seth; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.