Literature DB >> 20853041

Nipple-areolar complex-sparing mastectomy: feasibility, patient selection, and technique.

Gildy Babiera1, Rache Simmons.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the feasibility, patient selection, and technique of nipple-areolar complex (NAC)-sparing mastectomy. This dynamic article includes a video that demonstrates that sentinel node biopsy or axillary dissection can be performed through the mastectomy incisions or through a separate axillary incision.
METHODS: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center initiated a prospective study investigating the feasibility of performing NAC-sparing mastectomy in the setting of prophylaxis and breast cancer treatment. Patients selected were at low risk for skin/NAC necrosis and NAC involvement with tumor.
RESULTS: Preliminary results of 54 breasts that underwent NAC-sparing mastectomy showed a NAC necrosis rate of 7.2%. One patient who underwent NAC-sparing prophylactic mastectomy was found to have ductal carcinoma-in-situ that was not present at the nipple base. At a median follow-up of 15 months, there has been no NAC recurrence, which is similar to other reported series of 0% to 2%. Results were comparable with other small prospective series.
CONCLUSIONS: NAC-sparing mastectomy can be performed effectively while maintaining NAC viability. The risk of leaving residual breast tissue or occult tumor with the NAC is probably low if margin assessment is performed at the base or central core of the NAC. Long-term follow-up is forthcoming on these procedures. To achieve optimal cosmetic results with oncologic safety, NAC-sparing mastectomy should only be performed in carefully selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20853041     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1256-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  7 in total

Review 1.  What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?

Authors:  Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Immediate nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy reconstruction: An update on oncological and reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Eduardo Montag; José Roberto Filassi; Rolf Gemperli
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

3.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (Review).

Authors:  Stefan Janssen; Edna Holz-Sapra; Dirk Rades; Alexander Moser; Gabriela Studer
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Treatment of Implant Exposure due to Skin Necroses after Skin Sparing Mastectomy: Initial Experiences Using a Not Selective Random Epigastric Flap.

Authors:  Estíbaliz Echazarreta-Gallego; Guillermo Pola-Bandrés; María Dolores Arribas-Del Amo; Ismael Gil-Romea; Ramón Sousa-Domínguez; Antonio Güemes-Sánchez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Pure hemi-periareolar incision versus conventional lateral radial incision mastectomy and direct-to-implant breast reconstructions: comparison of indocyanine green angiographic perfusion and necrosis of the nipple.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Park; Ik Hyun Seong; Woosung Lim; Kyong-Je Woo
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

6.  Preoperative Ultrasound-guided Sub-areolar Biopsy in Predicting Occult Nipple Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients: Proposal for a Methodological Approach.

Authors:  Vittorio Altomare; Paolo Orsaria; Antonella Grasso; Lorenza Caggiati; Edy Ippolito; Francesco Pantano; Matteo Sammarra; Carlo Altomare; Giuseppe Perrone; Gabriella Gullotta; Rita Carino
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  Nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Bruna S Mota; Rachel Riera; Marcos Desidério Ricci; Jessica Barrett; Tiago B de Castria; Álvaro N Atallah; Jose Luiz B Bevilacqua
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.