| Literature DB >> 25088180 |
Abdelaaziz Ouahrouch1, Hana Ighachane, Moha Taourirte, Joachim W Engels, My Hassan Sedra, Hassan B Lazrek.
Abstract
A novel series of hybrid molecules 4a-i and 5a-i were prepared by condensation of 4-(trimethylsilylethynyl)benzaldehyde 1 with substituted o-phenylenediamines. These in turn were reacted with 2-(azidomethoxy)ethyl acetate in a Cu alkyne-azide cycloaddition (CuAAC) to generate the 1,2,3-triazole pharmacophore under microwave assistance. The newly synthesized compounds were examined for their in vitro antimicrobial activities against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and the phytopathogenic fungi Verticillium dahliae and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. albedinis. 2-((4-(4-(5-Trifluoromethyl benzimidazol-2-yl)phenyl)-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)methoxy)ethanol 5e showed a moderate inhibition of 30% in the Foa sporulation test.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial activity; Antifungal activity; Hybrid molecules
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25088180 PMCID: PMC4225497 DOI: 10.1002/ardp.201400142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Pharm (Weinheim) ISSN: 0365-6233 Impact factor: 3.751
Scheme 1Condensation reaction to 2a–i of 4-(trimethylsilylethynyl)benzaldehyde 1 with substituted o-phenylenediamines.
Scheme 2Deprotection of 2a–i to obtain the free acetylenic compounds 3a–i.
Results of 1,2,3-triazole-benzimidazole hybrids
| Entry | Product | Yield | Product | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 93 | 99 | ||
| 2 | 82 | 98 | ||
| 3 | 75 | 98 | ||
| 4 | 86 | 99 | ||
| 5 | 70 | 95 | ||
| 6 | 80 | 98 | ||
| 7 | 60 | 98 | ||
| 8 | 65 | 95 | ||
| 9 | 67 | – | – |
Isolated yields.
Scheme 3Microwave assisted Cu alkyne–azide cycloaddition to 4a–i followed by deprotection to 5a–h.
Figure 1X-ray crystal structure of compound 5a; displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Antifungal activities of compounds 5a–h at 20 µg/mL
| Linear growth inhibitory rates (%) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Compounds | VD | Foa |
| PELT | 100 ± 0.1 | 100 ± 0.14 |
| 11.29 ± 0.3 | 3.02 ± 0.96 | |
| 13.76 ± 0.6 | −1.59 ± 0.05 | |
| 10.64 ± 0.41 | 2.7 ± 0.16 | |
| 7.21 ± 0.84 | −0.16 ± 0.02 | |
| 29.76 ± 0.2 | 17.01 ± 0.96 | |
| −1.69 ± 0.03 | 2.3 ± 0.29 | |
| −7.72 ± 1.03 | −1.41 ± 0.3 | |
| 1.56 ± 0.07 | −1.14 ± 0.05 | |
Linear growth inhibitory rates, showing as mean ± standard error.
Figure 2Comparison of the inhibition rate (%) of compounds 5a–h at the 8th day against VD and Foa at 20 µg/mL.
Title compounds and their sporulation medium
| Sporulation inhibitory rates (means %) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Compounds | VD | Foa |
| PELT | 100 ± 0.02 | 100 ± 0.2 |
| −1.88 ± 0.03 | −5.85 ± 0.04 | |
| −18.87 ± 1.9 | 16.36 ± 0.2 | |
| −2.13 ± 0.83 | −34.79 ± 0.72 | |
| −14.82 ± 0.97 | 21.94 ± 0.26 | |
| 22.04 ± 1.02 | 30.62 ± 0.5 | |
| −0.31 ± 0.4 | −77.59 ± 2.64 | |
| −12.92 ± 0.6 | −61.05 ± 1.34 | |
| 5.59 ± 0.4 | −48.72 ± 2.35 | |
Shown as mean ± standard error.