Literature DB >> 25078366

Cementless dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision.

Jean Louis Prudhon1, François Steffann, André Ferreira, Régis Verdier, Thierry Aslanian, Jacques Caton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dislocation is a frequent complication in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision. Cup fixation is the second concern. In order to know outcomes at two years, we prospectively followed a continuous series of 78 patients to demonstrate that cementless dual-mobility cup (DMC) used in revision THA is safe as regards dislocation risk and bone fixation.
METHOD: We enrolled 78 consecutive patients (79 cases) in a prospective study. Mean interval between index surgery and revision was 12.9 years. Mean age at revision was 75.5 years. Two types of cementless DMC were used: a standard DMC in 68 cases with low-grade bone defect (Paprosky grade 1 and 2), and a specific design reconstruction DMC in 11 cases with severe bone loss (Paprosky grade 3).
RESULTS: At two years of follow-up, 68 patients were reviewed; four were lost to follow-up., and six patients were deceased. We identified three types of situations at risk:standard risk (33 cases), Paprosky grade 1 or 2; medium risk (37 cases), revision for recurrent instability (21), periprosthetic fractures (14) or severe loosening Paprosky grade 3 without femorotomy (2); high risk (nine cases), revision for severe loosening with a femorotomy. One (1.3%) patient dislocated her hip at one month without recurrence. Revision rate for dislocation was 0%; two (2.7%) early mechanical failures occurred.
CONCLUSION: Considering outcomes of this series, cementless DMC can be suggested in THA revision surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25078366     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2448-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  22 in total

1.  Total hip revision using a cup design with a peg to treat severe pelvic bone defects.

Authors:  P Desbonnet; H Connes; P Escare; J L Tricoire; J Trouillas
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.256

2.  Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Prudhon; André Ferreira; Régis Verdier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Prevention and treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement using large diameter balls.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Sridhar R Rachala; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Modular sleeves with ceramic heads in isolated acetabular cup revision in younger patients-laboratory and experimental analysis of suitability and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Peter Helwig; Lukas Konstantinidis; Anja Hirschmüller; Anke Bernstein; Oliver Hauschild; Norbert P Südkamp; Björn G Ochs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  What are the causes for failures of primary hip arthroplasties in France?

Authors:  Christian Delaunay; Moussa Hamadouche; Julien Girard; Alain Duhamel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Supercharging irradiated allografts with mesenchymal stem cells improves acetabular bone grafting in revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Jacques Pariat; Steffen Queinnec; Yasuhiro Homma; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette; Nathalie Chevallier; Helene Rouard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Acetabular cup positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type III acetabular defects: Martell radiographic analysis.

Authors:  Ho-Rim Choi; David Anderson; Scott Foster; Matthew Beal; Jo Ann Lee; Christopher Barr; Henrik Malchau; Joseph McCarthy; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  The dislocator, early and late: the role of large heads.

Authors:  Michael D Skeels; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  Recurrence of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty revision using dual mobility cups was rare in 180 hips followed over 7 years.

Authors:  Patrice Mertl; Antoine Combes; Frédérique Leiber-Wackenheim; Michel Henri Fessy; Julien Girard; Henri Migaud
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-19
View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Intra-prosthetic dislocation of dual-mobility cups after total hip arthroplasty: potential causes from a clinical and biomechanical perspective.

Authors:  Christian Fabry; Jean Langlois; Moussa Hamadouche; Rainer Bader
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anthony Viste; Romain Desmarchelier; Michel-Henri Fessy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  The evolution of outcomes and indications for the dual-mobility cup: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cécile Batailler; Camdon Fary; Régis Verdier; Thierry Aslanian; Jacques Caton; Sebastien Lustig
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Understanding wear in dual mobility total hip replacement: first generation explant wear patterns.

Authors:  Bertrand Boyer; Thomas Neri; Jean Geringer; Alexandre Di Iorio; Remi Philippot; Frederic Farizon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Outcomes of dual mobility cups in a young Middle Eastern population and its influence on life style.

Authors:  Chahine Assi; Elie El-Najjar; Camille Samaha; Kaissar Yammine
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Use of dual-mobility cup in revision hip arthroplasty reduces the risk for further dislocation: analysis of seven hundred and ninety one first-time revisions performed due to dislocation, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Maziar Mohaddes; Peter Cnudde; Ola Rolfson; Alexander Wall; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Bousquet dual mobility socket for patient under fifty years old. More than twenty year follow-up of one hundred and thirty one hips.

Authors:  Remi Philippot; Thomas Neri; Bertrand Boyer; Brice Viard; Frederic Farizon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Dual-mobility arthroplasty failure: a rationale review of causes and technical considerations for revision.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Arnaud Dubory; Damien Potage; François Roubineau; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Comparison of dual mobility cup and other surgical construts used for three hundred and sixty two first time hip revisions due to recurrent dislocations: five year results from Lithuanian arthroplasty register.

Authors:  Justinas Stucinskas; Tomas Kalvaitis; Alfredas Smailys; Otto Robertsson; Sarunas Tarasevicius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Dual mobility constructs in revision total hip arthroplasty: survivorship analysis in recurrent dislocation versus other indications at three to twelve-year follow-up.

Authors:  Nicolas de l'Escalopier; Valérie Dumaine; Guillaume Auberger; Antoine Babinet; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Philippe Anract; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.