Literature DB >> 24509980

Supercharging irradiated allografts with mesenchymal stem cells improves acetabular bone grafting in revision arthroplasty.

Philippe Hernigou1, Jacques Pariat, Steffen Queinnec, Yasuhiro Homma, Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette, Nathalie Chevallier, Helene Rouard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The procedure of bone allografting associated with a reinforcement device is widely used for acetabulum revision. However in absence of biologic fixation of the allograft, failure of the reconstruction may occur. We made the hypothesis that it would be possible to load these grafts with bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) to rescue the osteogenic capacity of an allogenic dead bone and therefore enhance incorporation of allografts with the host bone and decrease the number of failures related to the allograft.
METHOD: We identified 60 patients who had undergone acetabular component revision for aseptic failure of cemented implants associated with massive periacetabular osteolysis and Paprosky type 3A or 3B classification (without pelvic discontinuity) between 1996 and 2001. The study group of 30 patients received MSCs in the allograft and at the host graft junction. The average total number of MSCs received by each patient was 195,000 cells (range 86,000-254,000 cells). The control group of 30 patients had no MSCs in the allograft. Patients were matched for the size of periacetabular osteolysis (Paprosky type 3A or 3B). We compared the evolution of the allografts and evaluated cup migration and revision of the hips as end points at a minimum of 12 years or until failure. RESULT: Better radiographic graft union rates and less allograft resorption were observed with allografts loaded with stem cells. Allograft resorption was significantly decreased in the group with allograft loaded with MSCs (1.2 cm(2) -range 0-2.3 cm(2)-of resorption on radiographs in the group with MSCs; versus 6 cm(2), range 2.1-8.5 cm(2) in the group without MSCs). The rate of mechanical failure was highest (p = 0.01) among the 30 patients with allograft without stem cells (9/30; 30 %) compared with no failures for patients with allograft loaded with stem cells. Revision of the cup was necessary in nine patients in the control group. No revision was performed in the 30 patients of the study group with MSCs.
CONCLUSION: For acetabular defect reconstruction, loading the allograft with MSCs has resulted in a lower rate of failure as compared with allograft without MSCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24509980     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2285-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  37 in total

1.  Organisation, data evaluation, interpretation and effect of arthroplasty register data on the outcome in terms of revision rate in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gerold Labek; Wolfgang Janda; Mark Agreiter; Reinhard Schuh; Nikolaus Böhler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Percutaneous autologous bone-marrow grafting for nonunions. Influence of the number and concentration of progenitor cells.

Authors:  Ph Hernigou; A Poignard; F Beaujean; H Rouard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Sridhar R Rachala; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Stromal stem cells: marrow-derived osteogenic precursors.

Authors:  M Owen; A J Friedenstein
Journal:  Ciba Found Symp       Date:  1988

5.  Neovascularization and bone regeneration by implantation of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells.

Authors:  Takashi Hisatome; Yuji Yasunaga; Shinobu Yanada; Yasuhiko Tabata; Yoshito Ikada; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-01-11       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Strut grafts in revision hip arthroplasty faced with femoral bone defects: an experimental analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Marc N Thomsen; Jan Nadorf; Christian Heisel; Michael C Tanner; Eike Jakubowitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Acetabular cup positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type III acetabular defects: Martell radiographic analysis.

Authors:  Ho-Rim Choi; David Anderson; Scott Foster; Matthew Beal; Jo Ann Lee; Christopher Barr; Henrik Malchau; Joseph McCarthy; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Supercharging allografts with mesenchymal stem cells in the operating room during hip revision.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Homma; Kazuo Kaneko; Philippe Hernigou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Platelet lysate coating on scaffolds directly and indirectly enhances cell migration, improving bone and blood vessel formation.

Authors:  Julie Leotot; Laura Coquelin; Gwellaouen Bodivit; Philippe Bierling; Philippe Hernigou; Helene Rouard; Nathalie Chevallier
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 10.  Why are MSCs therapeutic? New data: new insight.

Authors:  A I Caplan
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.996

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Use of bone marrow derived stem cells in trauma and orthopaedics: A review of current concepts.

Authors:  Philip S Pastides; Matthew J Welck; Wasim S Khan
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-07-18

2.  Bone transplantation and tissue engineering, part III: allografts, bone grafting and bone banking in the twentieth century.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Intravenous administration of multipotent stromal cells and bone allograft modification to enhance allograft healing.

Authors:  Sharada Paudel; Wen-Han Lee; Moses Lee; Talal Zahoor; Reed Mitchell; Shang-You Yang; Haiqing Zhao; Lew Schon; Zijun Zhang
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 4.  Nanobiotechnology and bone regeneration: a mini-review.

Authors:  Nadomir Gusić; Alan Ivković; John VaFaye; Andreja Vukasović; Jana Ivković; Damir Hudetz; Saša Janković
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Tissue engineering and regenerative orthopaedics (TERO).

Authors:  Marko Pećina; Slobodan Vukičević
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants.

Authors:  Boris Steno; Milan Kokavec; Libor Necas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Mesenchymal stem cells in the aseptic loosening of total joint replacements.

Authors:  Jukka Pajarinen; Tzu-Hua Lin; Akira Nabeshima; Eemeli Jämsen; Laura Lu; Karthik Nathan; Zhenyu Yao; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.396

8.  [Therapeutic utilization of stem cells in orthopedics].

Authors:  C Chiari; S Walzer; D Stelzeneder; M Schreiner; R Windhager
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Morbidity of graft harvesting versus bone marrow aspiration in cell regenerative therapy.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Asuka Desroches; Steffen Queinnec; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette; Alexandre Poignard; Jerome Allain; Nathalie Chevallier; Helene Rouard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects.

Authors:  Yuanqing Mao; Chen Xu; Jiawei Xu; Huiwu Li; Fengxiang Liu; Degang Yu; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.