| Literature DB >> 25070008 |
Elizabeth P Schlaudecker1, Joan P Heck2, Elizabeth T MacIntyre2, Ruben Martinez2, Caitlin N Dodd3, Monica M McNeal4, Mary A Staat4, Jeffery E Heck5, Mark C Steinhoff6.
Abstract
Limited data are available in rural Honduran settings describing the etiology of respiratory infections, partially due to limited specimen transport. A new molecular transport media (MTM) preserves released nucleic acid at ambient temperature for later detection. Prospective surveillance was conducted in a Honduran clinic to identify 233 children less than 5 years of age presenting with respiratory symptoms. We obtained 2 nasopharyngeal samples and stored 1 in PrimeStore® MTM at room temperature and 1 in universal transport media (UTM) at -80 °C. The specimens were then transported to Cincinnati Children's Hospital and tested for 16 respiratory viruses using a multiplex PCR panel. The 2 specimen collection systems were similar for detecting the 4 most common viruses: influenza (Kappa = 0.7676, P < 0.0001), human metapneumovirus (Kappa = 0.8770, P < 0.0001), respiratory syncytial virus (Kappa = 0.6849, P < 0.0001), and parainfluenza (Kappa = 0.8796, P < 0.0001). These results suggest that clinical specimens transported via PrimeStore® MTM and UTM yield similar viral multiplex PCR results.Entities:
Keywords: Influenza; Transport medium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25070008 PMCID: PMC4164576 DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.05.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ISSN: 0732-8893 Impact factor: 2.803
Detection of viruses.
| Virus detected | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Media | Flu | hMPV | RSV | Paraflu | Total |
| MTM | 33 | 23 | 12 | 18 | 86 |
| UTM | 32 | 22 | 22 | 18 | 94 |
| 180 | |||||
Number of children with a virus detected in nasopharyngeal samples in MTM compared to gold standard (UTM).
Fig. 1Comparison of number of detected viruses⁎.
Statistical comparison of collection systems.
| Statistical test | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virus | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
| Flu | 81.25% | 96.52% | 78.79% | 97.00% |
| hMPV | 90.91% | 98.58% | 86.96% | 99.05% |
| RSV | 54.55% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 95.48% |
| Paraflu | 88.89% | 99.07% | 88.89% | 99.07% |
PPV = positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each virus detected in MTM compared to gold standard (UTM).