Literature DB >> 25064269

Nonparametric pore size distribution using d-PFG: comparison to s-PFG and migration to MRI.

Dan Benjamini1, Michal E Komlosh2, Peter J Basser3, Uri Nevo4.   

Abstract

Here we present the successful translation of a pore size distribution (PSD) estimation method from NMR to MRI. This approach is validated using a well-characterized MRI phantom consisting of stacked glass capillary arrays (GCA) having different diameters. By employing a double pulsed-field gradient (d-PFG) MRI sequence, this method overcomes several important theoretical and experimental limitations of previous single-PFG (s-PFG) based MRI methods by allowing the relative diffusion gradients' direction to vary. This feature adds an essential second dimension in the parameters space, which can potentially improve the reliability and stability of the PSD estimation. To infer PSDs from the MRI data in each voxel an inverse linear problem is solved in conjunction with the multiple correlation function (MCF) framework, which can account for arbitrary experimental parameters (e.g., long diffusion pulses). This scheme makes no a priori assumptions about the functional form of the underlying PSD. Creative use of region of interest (ROI) analysis allows us to create different underlying PSDs using the same GCA MRI phantom. We show that an s-PFG experiment on the GCA phantom fails to accurately reconstruct the size distribution, thus demonstrating the superiority of the d-PFG experiment. In addition, signal simulations corrupted by different noise levels were used to generate continuous and complex PSDs, which were then successfully reconstructed. Finally, owing to the reduced q- or b- values required to measure microscopic PSDs via d-PFG MRI, this method will be better suited to biomedical and clinical applications, in which gradient strength of scanners is limited.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double pulsed field gradient; Empirical; MRI; NMR; Nonparametric; Pore size distribution

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25064269      PMCID: PMC7477619          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2014.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  29 in total

1.  Restricted self-diffusion of water in a highly concentrated w/o emulsion studied using modulated gradient spin-echo NMR.

Authors:  Daniel Topgaard; Carin Malmborg; Olle Söderman
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  A general framework to quantify the effect of restricted diffusion on the NMR signal with applications to double pulsed field gradient NMR experiments.

Authors:  Evren Ozarslan; Noam Shemesh; Peter J Basser
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Compartment size estimation with double wave vector diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Martin A Koch; Jürgen Finsterbusch
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Detection of microscopic diffusion anisotropy on a whole-body MR system with double wave vector imaging.

Authors:  Marco Lawrenz; Jürgen Finsterbusch
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Determination of the defining boundary in nuclear magnetic resonance diffusion experiments.

Authors:  Frederik Bernd Laun; Tristan Anselm Kuder; Wolfhard Semmler; Bram Stieltjes
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Estimation of pore size distribution using concentric double pulsed-field gradient NMR.

Authors:  Dan Benjamini; Uri Nevo
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Pore size distribution of bioresorbable films using a 3-D diffusion NMR method.

Authors:  Dan Benjamini; Jonathan J Elsner; Meital Zilberman; Uri Nevo
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  A proposed 2D framework for estimation of pore size distribution by double pulsed field gradient NMR.

Authors:  Dan Benjamini; Yaniv Katz; Uri Nevo
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Compartment shape anisotropy (CSA) revealed by double pulsed field gradient MR.

Authors:  Evren Ozarslan
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  MR diffusion - "diffraction" phenomenon in multi-pulse-field-gradient experiments.

Authors:  Evren Ozarslan; Peter J Basser
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  16 in total

1.  Joint radius-length distribution as a measure of anisotropic pore eccentricity: an experimental and analytical framework.

Authors:  Dan Benjamini; Peter J Basser
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Physical and numerical phantoms for the validation of brain microstructural MRI: A cookbook.

Authors:  Els Fieremans; Hong-Hsi Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  JEDI: Joint Estimation Diffusion Imaging of macroscopic and microscopic tissue properties.

Authors:  Lawrence R Frank; Benjamin Zahneisen; Vitaly L Galinsky
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Connectome 2.0: Developing the next-generation ultra-high gradient strength human MRI scanner for bridging studies of the micro-, meso- and macro-connectome.

Authors:  Susie Y Huang; Thomas Witzel; Boris Keil; Alina Scholz; Mathias Davids; Peter Dietz; Elmar Rummert; Rebecca Ramb; John E Kirsch; Anastasia Yendiki; Qiuyun Fan; Qiyuan Tian; Gabriel Ramos-Llordén; Hong-Hsi Lee; Aapo Nummenmaa; Berkin Bilgic; Kawin Setsompop; Fuyixue Wang; Alexandru V Avram; Michal Komlosh; Dan Benjamini; Kulam Najmudeen Magdoom; Sudhir Pathak; Walter Schneider; Dmitry S Novikov; Els Fieremans; Slimane Tounekti; Choukri Mekkaoui; Jean Augustinack; Daniel Berger; Alexander Shapson-Coe; Jeff Lichtman; Peter J Basser; Lawrence L Wald; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 7.400

5.  White matter microstructure from nonparametric axon diameter distribution mapping.

Authors:  Dan Benjamini; Michal E Komlosh; Lynne A Holtzclaw; Uri Nevo; Peter J Basser
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Anisotropic phantom to calibrate high-q diffusion MRI methods.

Authors:  M E Komlosh; D Benjamini; A S Barnett; V Schram; F Horkay; A V Avram; P J Basser
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Using double pulsed-field gradient MRI to study tissue microstructure in traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Authors:  Michal E Komlosh; Dan Benjamini; Elizabeth B Hutchinson; Sarah King; Margalit Haber; Alexandru V Avram; Lynne A Holtzclaw; Abhishek Desai; Carlo Pierpaoli; Peter J Basser
Journal:  Microporous Mesoporous Mater       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 5.455

Review 8.  MR cell size imaging with temporal diffusion spectroscopy.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Jiang; Hua Li; Sean P Devan; John C Gore; Junzhong Xu
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Validating pore size estimates in a complex microfiber environment on a human MRI system.

Authors:  Chu-Chung Huang; Chih-Chin Heather Hsu; Feng-Lei Zhou; Slawomir Kusmia; Mark Drakesmith; Geoff J M Parker; Ching-Po Lin; Derek K Jones
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.737

10.  MRI-cytometry: Mapping nonparametric cell size distributions using diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Junzhong Xu; Xiaoyu Jiang; Sean P Devan; Lori R Arlinghaus; Eliot T McKinley; Jingping Xie; Zhongliang Zu; Qing Wang; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Yong Wang; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.