Literature DB >> 25063908

Regional variation in colorectal cancer testing and geographic availability of care in a publicly insured population.

Stephanie B Wheeler1, Tzy-Mey Kuo2, Ravi K Goyal2, Anne-Marie Meyer2, Kristen Hassmiller Lich3, Emily M Gillen3, Seth Tyree2, Carmen L Lewis4, Trisha M Crutchfield5, Christa E Martens2, Florence Tangka6, Lisa C Richardson6, Michael P Pignone7.   

Abstract

Despite its demonstrated effectiveness, colorectal cancer (CRC) testing is suboptimal, particularly in vulnerable populations such as those who are publicly insured. Prior studies provide an incomplete picture of the importance of the intersection of multilevel factors affecting CRC testing across heterogeneous geographic regions where vulnerable populations live. We examined CRC testing across regions of North Carolina by using population-based Medicare and Medicaid claims data from disabled individuals who turned 50 years of age during 2003-2008. We estimated multilevel models to examine predictors of CRC testing, including distance to the nearest endoscopy facility, county-level endoscopy procedural rates, and demographic and community contextual factors. Less than 50% of eligible individuals had evidence of CRC testing; men, African-Americans, Medicaid beneficiaries, and those living furthest away from endoscopy facilities had significantly lower odds of CRC testing, with significant regional variation. These results can help prioritize intervention strategies to improve CRC testing among publicly insured, disabled populations.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer screening; Disabled; Medicaid; Medicare; Multilevel modeling; Regional variation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25063908      PMCID: PMC5824429          DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Place        ISSN: 1353-8292            Impact factor:   4.078


  33 in total

1.  Data sources for measuring colorectal endoscopy use among Medicare enrollees.

Authors:  Anna P Schenck; Carrie N Klabunde; Joan L Warren; Sharon Peacock; William W Davis; Sarah T Hawley; Michael Pignone; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Revisiting Robinson: the perils of individualistic and ecologic fallacy.

Authors:  S V Subramanian; Kelvyn Jones; Afamia Kaddour; Nancy Krieger
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Factors associated with never being screened for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sandte L Stanley; Jessica B King; Cheryll C Thomas; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-02

4.  Disability and preventive cancer screening: results from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Anthony Ramirez; Gail C Farmer; David Grant; Theodora Papachristou
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Loneliness, social support networks, mood and wellbeing in community-dwelling elderly.

Authors:  Jeannette Golden; Ronán M Conroy; Irene Bruce; Aisling Denihan; Elaine Greene; Michael Kirby; Brian A Lawlor
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.485

Review 6.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Janneke Wilschut; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Implementing colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: addressing cancer health disparities through a regional cancer collaborative.

Authors:  Stephen H Taplin; David Haggstrom; Tracy Jacobs; Ada Determan; Jennifer Granger; Wanda Montalvo; William M Snyder; Susan Lockhart; Ahmed Calvo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Community contextual predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the USA: spatial multilevel regression analysis.

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Matthew Urato; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.918

10.  Urban-rural disparities in colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of 1998-2005 data from the Centers for Disease Control's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Authors:  Allison M Cole; J Elizabeth Jackson; Mark Doescher
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Data-Powered Participatory Decision Making: Leveraging Systems Thinking and Simulation to Guide Selection and Implementation of Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wheeler; Jennifer Leeman; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Florence K L Tangka; Melinda M Davis; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  Geographic and population-level disparities in colorectal cancer testing: A multilevel analysis of Medicaid and commercial claims data.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Stephanie Renfro; Robyn Pham; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Jackilen Shannon; Gloria D Coronado; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Examining Urban and Rural Differences in How Distance to Care Influences the Initiation and Completion of Treatment among Insured Cervical Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Lisa P Spees; Wendy R Brewster; Mahesh A Varia; Morris Weinberger; Christopher Baggett; Xi Zhou; Victoria M Petermann; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Mailed FIT (fecal immunochemical test), navigation or patient reminders? Using microsimulation to inform selection of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening in Medicaid enrollees.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Siddhartha Nambiar; Maria E Mayorga; Eliana Sullivan; Karen Hicklin; Meghan C O'Leary; Kristen Dillon; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Yifan Gu; Bonnie K Lind; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Time trends in utilization of G-CSF prophylaxis and risk of febrile neutropenia in a Medicare population receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Ravi K Goyal; Spiros Tzivelekis; Kenneth J Rothman; Sean D Candrilli; James A Kaye
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Multilevel Small-Area Estimation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States.

Authors:  Zahava Berkowitz; Xingyou Zhang; Thomas B Richards; Marion Nadel; Lucy A Peipins; James Holt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  "Taking the Bull by the Horns": Four Principles to Align Public Health, Primary Care, and Community Efforts to Improve Rural Cancer Control.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wheeler; Melinda M Davis
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Evaluating the urban-rural paradox: The complicated relationship between distance and the receipt of guideline-concordant care among cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisa P Spees; Stephanie B Wheeler; Mahesh Varia; Morris Weinberger; Christopher D Baggett; Xi Zhou; Victoria M Petermann; Wendy R Brewster
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Initiation of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Enrollees.

Authors:  Cynthia M Mojica; Savannah M Bradley; Bonnie K Lind; Yifan Gu; Gloria D Coronado; Melinda M Davis
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Comparative effectiveness of mailed reminders with and without fecal immunochemical tests for Medicaid beneficiaries at a large county health department: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alison T Brenner; Jewels Rhode; Jeff Y Yang; Dana Baker; Rebecca Drechsel; Marcus Plescia; Daniel S Reuland; Tom Wroth; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.