Literature DB >> 30733307

Examining Urban and Rural Differences in How Distance to Care Influences the Initiation and Completion of Treatment among Insured Cervical Cancer Patients.

Lisa P Spees1,2, Wendy R Brewster2,3, Mahesh A Varia4, Morris Weinberger5, Christopher Baggett2,6, Xi Zhou2, Victoria M Petermann7, Stephanie B Wheeler5,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although rural cancer patients encounter substantial barriers to care, they more often report receiving timely care than urban patients. We examined whether geographic distance, a contributor to urban-rural health disparities, differentially influences treatment initiation and completion among insured urban and rural cervical cancer patients.
METHODS: We identified women diagnosed with cervical cancer from 2004 to 2013 from a statewide cancer registry linked to multipayer, insurance claims. Primary outcomes were initiation of guideline-concordant care within 6 weeks of diagnosis and, among stage IB2-IVA cancer patients, completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in 56 days. We estimated risk ratios using modified Poisson regressions, stratified by urban/rural status, to examine the association between distance and treatment timing (initiation or completion).
RESULTS: Among 999 stage IA-IVA patients, 48% initiated guideline-concordant care within 6 weeks of diagnosis, and 37% of 492 stage IB2-IVA cancer patients completed CCRT in 56 days. In urban areas, stage IA-IVA patients who lived ≥15 miles from the nearest treatment facility were less likely to initiate timely treatment compared with those <5 miles [risk ratio (RR): 0.72; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.54-0.95]. Among IB2-IVA stage cancer patients, rural women residing ≥15 miles from the nearest radiation facility were more likely to complete CCRT in 56 days (RR: 2.49; 95% CI, 1.12-5.51).
CONCLUSIONS: Geographic distance differentially influences the initiation and completion of treatment among urban and rural cervical cancer patients. IMPACT: Distance was an access barrier for insured cervical cancer patients in urban areas whereas rural patients may require more intensive outreach, support, and resources, even among those living closer to treatment. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30733307      PMCID: PMC6500480          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  30 in total

1.  Perceived barriers to health care access among rural older adults: a qualitative study.

Authors:  R Turner Goins; Kimberly A Williams; Mary W Carter; Melinda Spencer; Tatiana Solovieva
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Regional variation in colorectal cancer testing and geographic availability of care in a publicly insured population.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wheeler; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Ravi K Goyal; Anne-Marie Meyer; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Emily M Gillen; Seth Tyree; Carmen L Lewis; Trisha M Crutchfield; Christa E Martens; Florence Tangka; Lisa C Richardson; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.078

3.  Surgical wait time: A new health indicator in women with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Anna E Strohl; Joseph M Feinglass; Shohreh Shahabi; Melissa A Simon
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  The effect of treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Suisui Song; Sonali Rudra; Michael D Hasselle; Paige L Dorn; Loren K Mell; Arno J Mundt; S Diane Yamada; Nita K Lee; Yasmin Hasan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Patterns of care and treatment outcomes for elderly women with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Charu Sharma; Israel Deutsch; David P Horowitz; Dawn L Hershman; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Clifford K Chao; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Disparities by Race, Age, and Sex in the Improvement of Survival for Major Cancers: Results From the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program in the United States, 1990 to 2010.

Authors:  Chenjie Zeng; Wanqing Wen; Alicia K Morgans; William Pao; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wei Zheng
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Rural-urban trends and patterns in cervical cancer mortality, incidence, stage, and survival in the United States, 1950-2008.

Authors:  Gopal K Singh
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-02

Review 8.  Rural residence and cancer outcomes in the United States: issues and challenges.

Authors:  Ashley Meilleur; S V Subramanian; Jesse J Plascak; James L Fisher; Electra D Paskett; Elizabeth B Lamont
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Jane G Zapka; Stephen H Taplin; Leif I Solberg; M Michele Manos
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Effects of residence and race on burden of travel for care: cross sectional analysis of the 2001 US National Household Travel Survey.

Authors:  Janice C Probst; Sarah B Laditka; Jong-Yi Wang; Andrew O Johnson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Outcomes: Opportunities for Future Research.

Authors:  Smita Bhatia; Wendy Landier; Electra D Paskett; Katherine B Peters; Janette K Merrill; Jonathan Phillips; Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 11.816

2.  A qualitative study of patient preferences for prompts and reminders for a direct-mail fecal testing program.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Rose Gunn; Jennifer S Rivelli; Katherine A Vaughn; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  The impact of patient travel time on disparities in treatment for early stage lung cancer in California.

Authors:  Chelsea A Obrochta; Humberto Parada; James D Murphy; Atsushi Nara; Dennis Trinidad; Maria Rosario Happy Araneta; Caroline A Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Spatiotemporal modelling and mapping of cervical cancer incidence among HIV positive women in South Africa: a nationwide study.

Authors:  Dhokotera Tafadzwa; Riou Julien; Bartels Lina; Rohner Eliane; Chammartin Frederique; Johnson Leigh; Singh Elvira; Olago Victor; Sengayi-Muchengeti Mazvita; Egger Matthias; Bohlius Julia; Konstantinoudis Garyfallos
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.918

5.  Health Care Access Measures and Palliative Care Use by Race/Ethnicity among Metastatic Gynecological Cancer Patients in the United States.

Authors:  Jessica Y Islam; Veeral Saraiya; Rebecca A Previs; Tomi Akinyemiju
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Factors Associated with Duration of Overall Treatment Time for Cervical Cancer Treated with Definitive Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Vladimir Valakh; Bryan C Coopey
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-10-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.