Literature DB >> 29500250

Multilevel Small-Area Estimation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States.

Zahava Berkowitz1, Xingyou Zhang2, Thomas B Richards3, Marion Nadel3, Lucy A Peipins3, James Holt3.   

Abstract

Background: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends routine screening for colorectal cancer for adults ages 50 to 75 years. We generated small-area estimates for being current with colorectal cancer screening to examine sociogeographic differences among states and counties. To our knowledge, nationwide county-level estimates for colorectal cancer screening are rarely presented.
Methods: We used county data from the 2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS; n = 251,360 adults), linked it to the American Community Survey poverty data, and fitted multilevel logistic regression models. We post-stratified the data with the U.S. Census population data to run Monte Carlo simulations. We generated county-level screening prevalence estimates nationally and by race/ethnicity, mapped the estimates, and aggregated them into state and national estimates. We evaluated internal consistency of our modeled state-specific estimates with BRFSS direct state estimates using Spearman correlation coefficients.
Results: Correlation coefficients were ≥0.95, indicating high internal consistency. We observed substantial variations in current colorectal cancer screening estimates among the states and counties within states. State mean estimates ranged from 58.92% in Wyoming to 75.03% in Massachusetts. County mean estimates ranged from 40.11% in Alaska to 79.76% in Florida. Larger county variations were observed in various race/ethnicity groups.Conclusions: State estimates mask county variations. However, both state and county estimates indicate that the country is far behind the "80% by 2018" target.Impact: County-modeled estimates help identify variation in colorectal cancer screening prevalence in the United States and guide education and enhanced screening efforts in areas of need, including areas without BRFSS direct-estimates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(3); 245-53. ©2018 AACR. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29500250      PMCID: PMC5836477          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  21 in total

Review 1.  Lessons learned from community-based cancer screening intervention research.

Authors:  Rena J Pasick; Robert A Hiatt; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Screening colonoscopy in the US: attitudes and practices of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Carrie N Klabunde; Stephen Taplin; Gigi Yuan; David Ransohoff; Sarah Kobrin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  The road ahead: what if gastroenterologists were accountable for preventing colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Multilevel regression and poststratification for small-area estimation of population health outcomes: a case study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence using the behavioral risk factor surveillance system.

Authors:  Xingyou Zhang; James B Holt; Hua Lu; Anne G Wheaton; Earl S Ford; Kurt J Greenlund; Janet B Croft
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C Grossman; Susan J Curry; Karina W Davidson; John W Epling; Francisco A R García; Matthew W Gillman; Diane M Harper; Alex R Kemper; Alex H Krist; Ann E Kurth; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Douglas K Owens; William R Phillips; Maureen G Phipps; Michael P Pignone; Albert L Siu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Jean A Shapiro; Carrie N Klabunde; Trevor D Thompson; Marion R Nadel; Laura C Seeff; Arica White
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Validation of multilevel regression and poststratification methodology for small area estimation of health indicators from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system.

Authors:  Xingyou Zhang; James B Holt; Shumei Yun; Hua Lu; Kurt J Greenlund; Janet B Croft
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Colorectal cancer screening: language is a greater barrier for Latino men than Latino women.

Authors:  J A Diaz; M B Roberts; J G Clarke; E M Simmons; R E Goldman; W Rakowski
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2013-06

9.  Effect of language on colorectal cancer screening among Latinos and non-Latinos.

Authors:  Joseph A Diaz; Mary B Roberts; Roberta E Goldman; Sherrie Weitzen; Charles B Eaton
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Contribution of behavioral risk factors and obesity to socioeconomic differences in colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Jacqueline M Major; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Mario Schootman; Ann G Zauber; Albert R Hollenbeck; Rashmi Sinha; Jeroan Allison
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  13 in total

1.  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: Increasing Access to Screening.

Authors:  Faye L Wong; Jacqueline W Miller
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Small Area Estimates of Populations With Chronic Conditions for Community Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies.

Authors:  James B Holt; Kevin A Matthews; Hua Lu; Yan Wang; Jennifer M LeClercq; Kurt J Greenlund; Craig W Thomas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Multilevel analysis in rural cancer control: A conceptual framework and methodological implications.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Sara L McLafferty; Jan M Eberth
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  PLACES: Local Data for Better Health.

Authors:  Kurt J Greenlund; Hua Lu; Yan Wang; Kevin A Matthews; Jennifer M LeClercq; Benjamin Lee; Susan A Carlson
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  Multilevel Regression for Small-Area Estimation of Mammography Use in the United States, 2014.

Authors:  Zahava Berkowitz; Xingyou Zhang; Thomas B Richards; Susan A Sabatino; Lucy A Peipins; James Holt; Mary C White
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Disparities in colorectal cancer screening in New York City: An analysis of the 2014 NYC Community Health Survey.

Authors:  Neelesh Rastogi; Yuhe Xia; John M Inadomi; Simona C Kwon; Chau Trinh-Shevrin; Peter S Liang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Using the health belief model to assess racial/ethnic disparities in cancer-related behaviors in an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center catchment area.

Authors:  Amy K Otto; Dana Ketcher; Rachael McCormick; Jenna L Davis; McKenzie R McIntyre; Yunqi Liao; Maija Reblin; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.532

8.  Socioeconomic status and colorectal cancer screening behaviors in a vulnerable multiethnic population.

Authors:  Eduardo J Santiago-Rodríguez; Natalie A Rivadeneira; Jacqueline M Torres; Urmimala Sarkar; Robert A Hiatt
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.732

9.  Bivariate Spatial Pattern between Smoking Prevalence and Lung Cancer Screening in US Counties.

Authors:  Bian Liu; Jeremy Sze; Lihua Li; Katherine A Ornstein; Emanuela Taioli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Factors associated with mammography use: A side-by-side comparison of results from two national surveys.

Authors:  Lihua Li; Jiayi Ji; Melanie Besculides; Nina Bickell; Laurie R Margolies; Lina Jandorf; Emanuela Taioli; Madhu Mazumdar; Bian Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.