Literature DB >> 25056955

Molecular mechanisms for sweet-suppressing effect of gymnemic acids.

Keisuke Sanematsu1, Yuko Kusakabe2, Noriatsu Shigemura3, Takatsugu Hirokawa4, Seiji Nakamura5, Toshiaki Imoto6, Yuzo Ninomiya7.   

Abstract

Gymnemic acids are triterpene glycosides that selectively suppress taste responses to various sweet substances in humans but not in mice. This sweet-suppressing effect of gymnemic acids is diminished by rinsing the tongue with γ-cyclodextrin (γ-CD). However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying the sweet-suppressing effect of gymnemic acids and the interaction between gymnemic acids versus sweet taste receptor and/or γ-CD. To investigate whether gymnemic acids directly interact with human (h) sweet receptor hT1R2 + hT1R3, we used the sweet receptor T1R2 + T1R3 assay in transiently transfected HEK293 cells. Similar to previous studies in humans and mice, gymnemic acids (100 μg/ml) inhibited the [Ca(2+)]i responses to sweet compounds in HEK293 cells heterologously expressing hT1R2 + hT1R3 but not in those expressing the mouse (m) sweet receptor mT1R2 + mT1R3. The effect of gymnemic acids rapidly disappeared after rinsing the HEK293 cells with γ-CD. Using mixed species pairings of human and mouse sweet receptor subunits and chimeras, we determined that the transmembrane domain of hT1R3 was mainly required for the sweet-suppressing effect of gymnemic acids. Directed mutagenesis in the transmembrane domain of hT1R3 revealed that the interaction site for gymnemic acids shared the amino acid residues that determined the sensitivity to another sweet antagonist, lactisole. Glucuronic acid, which is the common structure of gymnemic acids, also reduced sensitivity to sweet compounds. In our models, gymnemic acids were predicted to dock to a binding pocket within the transmembrane domain of hT1R3.
© 2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calcium Imaging; G Protein-coupled Receptor; Gymnemic Acids; Molecular Evolution; Molecular Modeling; Signal Transduction; Sweet Taste; T1R2 + T1R3

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25056955      PMCID: PMC4162174          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.560409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  42 in total

Review 1.  An overview on the advances of Gymnema sylvestre: chemistry, pharmacology and patents.

Authors:  E Porchezhian; R M Dobriyal
Journal:  Pharmazie       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.267

2.  Suppression of sweet sensitivity by potassium gymnemate.

Authors:  R M WARREN; C PFAFFMANN
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  ZINC--a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening.

Authors:  John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Molecular genetic identification of a candidate receptor gene for sweet taste.

Authors:  M Kitagawa; Y Kusakabe; H Miura; Y Ninomiya; A Hino
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  On the effects of gymnemic acid in the hamster and rat.

Authors:  G Hellekant; V Gopal
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1976-10

6.  Molecular mechanism of the sweet taste enhancers.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Boris Klebansky; Richard M Fine; Haitian Liu; Hong Xu; Guy Servant; Mark Zoller; Catherine Tachdjian; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Structure of a class C GPCR metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 bound to an allosteric modulator.

Authors:  Huixian Wu; Chong Wang; Karen J Gregory; Gye Won Han; Hyekyung P Cho; Yan Xia; Colleen M Niswender; Vsevolod Katritch; Jens Meiler; Vadim Cherezov; P Jeffrey Conn; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Antisweet activity of gymnemic acid A1 and its derivatives.

Authors:  Y Kurihara
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1969-05-01       Impact factor: 5.037

9.  Gymnemic acids inhibit rabbit glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and induce a smearing of its electrophoretic band and dephosphorylation.

Authors:  Yusuke Izutani; Takuya Murai; Toshiaki Imoto; Masatake Ohnishi; Masayuki Oda; Sumio Ishijima
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 4.124

10.  Different functional roles of T1R subunits in the heteromeric taste receptors.

Authors:  Hong Xu; Lena Staszewski; Huixian Tang; Elliot Adler; Mark Zoller; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  15 in total

1.  Structural architecture of a dimeric class C GPCR based on co-trafficking of sweet taste receptor subunits.

Authors:  Jihye Park; Balaji Selvam; Keisuke Sanematsu; Noriatsu Shigemura; Diwakar Shukla; Erik Procko
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The Influence of Assay Design, Blinding, and Gymnema sylvestre on Sucrose Detection by Humans.

Authors:  Max G Aleman; Lauren J Marconi; Nam H Nguyen; Jae M Park; Maria M Patino; Yuchi Wang; Celeste S Watkins; Chris Shelley
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2016-04-15

Review 3.  What Does Diabetes "Taste" Like?

Authors:  Fabrice Neiers; Marie-Chantal Canivenc-Lavier; Loïc Briand
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Bacterial d-amino acids suppress sinonasal innate immunity through sweet taste receptors in solitary chemosensory cells.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Benjamin M Hariri; Derek B McMahon; Bei Chen; Laurel Doghramji; Nithin D Adappa; James N Palmer; David W Kennedy; Peihua Jiang; Robert F Margolskee; Noam A Cohen
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 8.192

5.  Bitter Taste Responses of Gustducin-positive Taste Cells in Mouse Fungiform and Circumvallate Papillae.

Authors:  Ryusuke Yoshida; Shingo Takai; Keisuke Sanematsu; Robert F Margolskee; Noriatsu Shigemura; Yuzo Ninomiya
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Intracellular acidification is required for full activation of the sweet taste receptor by miraculin.

Authors:  Keisuke Sanematsu; Masayuki Kitagawa; Ryusuke Yoshida; Satoru Nirasawa; Noriatsu Shigemura; Yuzo Ninomiya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Sweet taste receptor inhibitors: Potential treatment for equine insulin dysregulation.

Authors:  Melody Anne de Laat; Murad Hasan Kheder; Christopher Charles Pollitt; Martin Nicholas Sillence
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Structural insights into the differences among lactisole derivatives in inhibitory mechanisms against the human sweet taste receptor.

Authors:  Tomoya Nakagita; Akiko Ishida; Takumi Matsuya; Takuya Kobayashi; Masataka Narukawa; Takatsugu Hirokawa; Makoto Hashimoto; Takumi Misaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Gymnemic Acids Inhibit Adhesive Nanofibrillar Mediated Streptococcus gordonii-Candida albicans Mono-Species and Dual-Species Biofilms.

Authors:  Raja Veerapandian; Govindsamy Vediyappan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Association of aescin with β- and γ-cyclodextrins studied by DFT calculations and spectroscopic methods.

Authors:  Ana I Ramos; Pedro D Vaz; Susana S Braga; Artur M S Silva
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.