Literature DB >> 30723160

Structural architecture of a dimeric class C GPCR based on co-trafficking of sweet taste receptor subunits.

Jihye Park1, Balaji Selvam2, Keisuke Sanematsu3,4, Noriatsu Shigemura3,4, Diwakar Shukla2, Erik Procko5.   

Abstract

Class C G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are obligatory dimers that are particularly important for neuronal responses to endogenous and environmental stimuli. Ligand recognition through large extracellular domains leads to the reorganization of transmembrane regions to activate G protein signaling. Although structures of individual domains are known, the complete architecture of a class C GPCR and the mechanism of interdomain coupling during receptor activation are unclear. By screening a mutagenesis library of the human class C sweet taste receptor subunit T1R2, we enhanced surface expression and identified a dibasic intracellular retention motif that modulates surface expression and co-trafficking with its heterodimeric partner T1R3. Using a highly expressed T1R2 variant, dimerization sites along the entire subunit within all the structural domains were identified by a comprehensive mutational scan for co-trafficking with T1R3 in human cells. The data further reveal that the C terminus of the extracellular cysteine-rich domain needs to be properly folded for T1R3 dimerization and co-trafficking, but not for surface expression of T1R2 alone. These results guided the modeling of the T1R2-T1R3 dimer in living cells, which predicts a twisted arrangement of domains around the central axis, and a continuous folded structure between transmembrane domain loops and the cysteine-rich domains. These insights have implications for how conformational changes between domains are coupled within class C GPCRs.
© 2019 Park et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR); deep mutational scan; dimerization; directed evolution; membrane trafficking; molecular modeling; mutagenesis; structural model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30723160      PMCID: PMC6442050          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  72 in total

1.  Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository.

Authors:  Ron Edgar; Michael Domrachev; Alex E Lash
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Structure and ligand recognition of class C GPCRs.

Authors:  Lei Chun; Wen-hua Zhang; Jian-feng Liu
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Fragment and Structure-Based Drug Discovery for a Class C GPCR: Discovery of the mGlu5 Negative Allosteric Modulator HTL14242 (3-Chloro-5-[6-(5-fluoropyridin-2-yl)pyrimidin-4-yl]benzonitrile).

Authors:  John A Christopher; Sarah J Aves; Kirstie A Bennett; Andrew S Doré; James C Errey; Ali Jazayeri; Fiona H Marshall; Krzysztof Okrasa; Maria J Serrano-Vega; Benjamin G Tehan; Giselle R Wiggin; Miles Congreve
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Interactions of the sweet protein brazzein with the sweet taste receptor.

Authors:  D Eric Walters; Göran Hellekant
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 5.  Role of N-glycosylation in trafficking of apical membrane proteins in epithelia.

Authors:  Olga Vagin; Jeffrey A Kraut; George Sachs
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2008-10-29

Review 6.  Molecular insights into allosteric modulation of Class C G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Katie Leach; Karen J Gregory
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 7.658

7.  Structure of class C GPCR metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 transmembrane domain.

Authors:  Andrew S Doré; Krzysztof Okrasa; Jayesh C Patel; Maria Serrano-Vega; Kirstie Bennett; Robert M Cooke; James C Errey; Ali Jazayeri; Samir Khan; Ben Tehan; Malcolm Weir; Giselle R Wiggin; Fiona H Marshall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Mammalian sweet taste receptors.

Authors:  G Nelson; M A Hoon; J Chandrashekar; Y Zhang; N J Ryba; C S Zuker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Molecular mechanisms for sweet-suppressing effect of gymnemic acids.

Authors:  Keisuke Sanematsu; Yuko Kusakabe; Noriatsu Shigemura; Takatsugu Hirokawa; Seiji Nakamura; Toshiaki Imoto; Yuzo Ninomiya
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Identification of key neoculin residues responsible for the binding and activation of the sweet taste receptor.

Authors:  Taichi Koizumi; Tohru Terada; Ken-ichiro Nakajima; Masaki Kojima; Seizo Koshiba; Yoshitaka Matsumura; Kohei Kaneda; Tomiko Asakura; Akiko Shimizu-Ibuka; Keiko Abe; Takumi Misaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  13 in total

1.  Conformational Engineering of HIV-1 Env Based on Mutational Tolerance in the CD4 and PG16 Bound States.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Heredia; Jihye Park; Hannah Choi; Kevin S Gill; Erik Procko
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Recent Advances in Machine Learning Variant Effect Prediction Tools for Protein Engineering.

Authors:  Jesse Horne; Diwakar Shukla
Journal:  Ind Eng Chem Res       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.326

3.  Calcium-sensing receptor signaling - How human disease informs biology.

Authors:  Caroline M Gorvin
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res       Date:  2020-07-02

4.  TAPBPR promotes antigen loading on MHC-I molecules using a peptide trap.

Authors:  Andrew C McShan; Christine A Devlin; Giora I Morozov; Sarah A Overall; Danai Moschidi; Neha Akella; Erik Procko; Nikolaos G Sgourakis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Bridging non-overlapping reads illuminates high-order epistasis between distal protein sites in a GPCR.

Authors:  Justin I Yoo; Patrick S Daugherty; Michelle A O'Malley
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  The sequence of human ACE2 is suboptimal for binding the S spike protein of SARS coronavirus 2.

Authors:  Erik Procko
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2020-05-11

7.  Protein Structural Information and Evolutionary Landscape by In Vitro Evolution.

Authors:  Marco Fantini; Simonetta Lisi; Paolo De Los Rios; Antonino Cattaneo; Annalisa Pastore
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Engineering human ACE2 to optimize binding to the spike protein of SARS coronavirus 2.

Authors:  Kui K Chan; Danielle Dorosky; Preeti Sharma; Shawn A Abbasi; John M Dye; David M Kranz; Andrew S Herbert; Erik Procko
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Deep mutagenesis in the study of COVID-19: a technical overview for the proteomics community.

Authors:  Erik Procko
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.940

10.  Structural and functional characterization of G protein-coupled receptors with deep mutational scanning.

Authors:  Eric M Jones; Nathan B Lubock; A J Venkatakrishnan; Jeffrey Wang; Alex M Tseng; Joseph M Paggi; Naomi R Latorraca; Daniel Cancilla; Megan Satyadi; Jessica E Davis; M Madan Babu; Ron O Dror; Sriram Kosuri
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.