| Literature DB >> 25051953 |
Susann Grosse1, Hans Kristian Haugland, Peer Lilleng, Peter Ellison, Geir Hallan, Paul Johan Høl.
Abstract
Wear debris-induced inflammation is considered to be the main cause for periprosthetic osteolysis in total hip replacements (THR). The objective of this retrieval study was to examine the tissue reactions and exposure to metal ions and wear particles in periprosthetic tissues and blood samples from patients with titanium (Ti)-based hip prostheses that were revised due to wear, osteolysis, and/or aseptic loosening. Semiquantitative, histological tissue evaluations in 30 THR-patients revealed numerous wear debris-loaded macrophages, inflammatory cells, and necrosis in both groups. Particle load was highest in tissues adjacent to loosened cemented Ti stems that contained mainly submicron zirconium (Zr) dioxide particles. Particles containing pure Ti and Ti alloy elements were most abundant in tissues near retrieved uncemented cups. Polyethylene particles were also detected, but accounted only for a small portion of the total particle number. The blood concentrations of Ti and Zr were highly elevated in cases with high abrasive wear and osteolysis. Our findings indicate that wear particles of different chemical composition induced similar inflammatory responses, which suggests that particle size and load might be more important than the wear particle composition in periprosthetic inflammation and osteolysis.Entities:
Keywords: hip prostheses; metal ions; osteolysis; titanium; wear debris
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25051953 PMCID: PMC4413358 DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater ISSN: 1552-4973 Impact factor: 3.368
Patient Data, Implant Duration, and Reasons for Revision
| Case No. | Gender, Age at Retrieval (yr) | Duration (months) | Reason for Revision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uncemented | |||
| 1 | M, 51 | 214 | Cup loosening |
| 2 | F, 70 | 196 | PE wear, pain |
| 3 | M, 65 | 167 | Acetabular osteolysis, loosening |
| 4 | F, 68 | 160 | Cup loosening |
| 5 | F, 78 | 173 | Acetabular osteolysis, cup loosening |
| 6 | F, 72 | 185 | Acetabular osteolysis, PE wear |
| 7 | F, | 228 | Acetabular osteolysis, PE wear |
| 8 | M, 44 | 200 | PE wear |
| 9 | F, 54 | 174 | Acetabular osteolysis, PE wear |
| 10 | F, 77 | 87 | PE wear |
| 11 | M, 53 | 167 | Acetabular osteolysis, PE wear, pain |
| 12 | F, 76 | 232 | Acetabular osteolysis, PE wear |
| 13 | M, 70 | 222 | Cup loosening |
| 14 | M, 76 | 220 | PE wear, acetabular osteolysis |
| 15 | F, 56 | 200 | PE wear, acetabular osteolysis |
| Cemented | |||
| 16 | M, 78 | 69 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening |
| 17 | F, 71 | 52 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening |
| 18 | F, 50 | 99 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening |
| 19 | M, 79 | 70 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening |
| 20 | M, 64 | 72 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening |
| 21 | M, 73 | 24 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening |
| 22 | M, 78 | 97 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening |
| 23 | M, 77 | 74 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening |
| 24 | M, 69 | 18 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening |
| 25 | M, 80 | 105 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening |
| 26 | F, 67 | 90 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening |
| 27 | F, 76 | 98 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening |
| 28 | F, 62 | 141 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening |
| 29 | M, 71 | 89 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening |
| 30 | 75 | Femoral osteolysis, stem loosening | |
Uncemented TiAlV femoral stems (Profile, DePuy) and uncemented metal-backed cups with conventional UHMWPE liners. The head material in these cases was CoCr, except for case nr. 1 (alumina).
NA: not available.
Cemented femoral stems and PE-liners (TiAlV, Titan®, DePuy). The head materials were mainly CoCr exept for cases: 17, 20, and 28 (alumina).
Modified Mirra Classification Used to Assess Tissue Reactions and Wear Particle Load in Periprosthetic Tissue Samples
| Histology | 0 | 1+ | 2+ | 3+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute inflammatory cells (neutrophils) | 0 cells/HPF | 1–5 cells/HPF | 6–49 cells/HPF | 50 or more/HPF |
| Mononuclear histiocytes | 0 cells/HPF | 1–5 cells/HPF | 6–49 cells/HPF | 50 or more/HPF |
| Chronic inflammatory cells (lymphocytes, plasma cells, lymphoid follicles) | 0 cells/HPF | 1–9 cells/HPF | 10–49 cells/HPF | 50 or more/HPF |
| Giant cells (multinucleated histiocytes) | 0 cells/HPF | 1 cell/HPF | 2–4 cells/HPF | 5 or more cells/HPF |
| Metal particles | Normal colored histiocytes (no visible, black metal particles per histiocyte) | Slate blue histiocytes (<10 visible, black metal particles per histiocyte) | Dusty black histiocytes (10 to 100 visible, black Metal particles per histiocyte) | Jet black histiocytes (>100 visible, black metal particles per histiocyte) |
| Necrosis | 0 mm of necrosis/slide | 1–2 mm of necrosis/slide | 3–9 mm of necrosis/slide | >1 cm of necrosis/slide |
HPF: high power field (×40).
FIGURE 1Radiological images illustrating the reason for revision in both studied patient groups. A: Wear and acetabular osteolysis and/or aseptic loosening of the cup were the reasons for revision in the uncemented group. B: Femoral osteolysis and stem loosening were the reasons for revision in the cemented group.
Periprosthetic Tissue Reactions in Patients with Uncemented Metal-Backed Cups and Cemented Titanium Stems
| Case No. | Mononuclear Histiocytes | Chronic Inflammatory Cells | Multinucleated Giant Cells | Neutrophils | Metal Particles/Histiocytes | Necrosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncemented | ||||||
| 1 | 2+ | 3+ | 0 | 2+ | 1+ | 0 |
| 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 2+ |
| 3 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3+ |
| 5 | 3+ | 3+ | 0 | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ |
| 6 | 3+ | 2+ | 0 | 1+ | 1+ | 2+ |
| 7 | 3+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ | 3+ |
| 8 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ |
| 9 | 3+ | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ | 3+ | 2+ |
| 10 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 0 |
| 11 | 3+ | 2+ | 0 | 2+ | 0 | 3+ |
| 12 | 3+ | 2+ | 0 | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ |
| 13 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ |
| 14 | 3+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 3+ | 2+ |
| 15 | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ |
| Cemented | ||||||
| 16 | 3+ | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ | 2+ | 2+ |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3+ |
| 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3+ |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3+ |
| 20 | 3+ | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ |
| 21 | 3+ | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ | 2+ | 2+ |
| 22 | 3+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ |
| 23 | 3+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ |
| 24 | 2+ | 1+ | 0 | 1+ | 1+ | 2+ |
| 25 | 3+ | 2+ | 0 | 1+ | 2+ | 3+ |
| 26 | 3+ | 2+ | 0 | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ |
| 27 | 3+ | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ | 2+ | 2+ |
| 28 | 3+ | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 2+ |
| 29 | 2+ | 1+ | 0 | 1+ | 1+ | 3+ |
| 30 | 3+ | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ | 2+ | 3+ |
Uncemented cups: tissue samples were taken from the joint capsule and/or the acetabular membrane; cemented stems: tissue samples were taken from the proximal femur, distal femur, or the femur channel.
FIGURE 2Light microscopy images of periprosthetic tissues. A: Lymphocyte infiltration (black arrows pointing to dark violet cell cluster on the left side) and multinucleated giant cells (red arrows; case no. 15 with uncemented metal-backed cup); H&E, 20×. B: Multinucleated giant cells (black arrows) containing metal particles (Ti and ZrO2; case no. 20 with cemented Ti stem); H&E, 40×.
FIGURE 3Darkfield microscopy image (H&E, 100×) showing a multinucleated foreign body giant cell (green arrow) containing metal particles (case no. 14). Metal particles inside the cells appear white; nuclei appear black (red arrows).
FIGURE 4Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images with EDXA spectra of isolated particles (white arrows). A: SEM image, left side: Secondary emission: showing all particles on the filter. SEM image, right side: backscattered, highlighting dense ZrO2 particles typically found in tissues near cemented stems (case no. 25). B: Ti particles, such as particle 3 in backscattered image, were most frequent in tissues around the uncemented cups. C: Ti alloy particle from an uncemented case (no. 5). These particles were also found around the cemented stems.
Particle Characterization Using Digital Images (40× Magnification) of Periprosthetic Tissues from Patients with Uncemented Metal-Backed Cups and Cemented Titanium Stems
| Case No. | Particle Density (per mm2) | Median Equivalent Diameter (µm) | Median Circularity | PE density (per mm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncemented | ||||
| 1 | 1413 | 0.57 | 0.85 | 1.7 |
| 2 | 14,719 | 0.36 | N/A | 1.9 |
| 3 | 1626 | 0.42 | 0.95 | 27.8 |
| 4 | 8114 | 0.42 | 1 | 11.5 |
| 5 | 2641 | 0.36 | 1 | 0.6 |
| 6 | 117 | 0.47 | 0.82 | 0 |
| 7 | 1214 | 1.05 | 0.92 | 7.3 |
| 8 | 5357 | 0.36 | 1 | 3.0 |
| 9 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 23.6 |
| 10 | 1338 | 0.42 | 1 | 4.4 |
| 11 | 69 | 2.6 | N/A | 0.2 |
| 12 | 3827 | 0.52 | 0.98 | 24.9 |
| 13 | 185 | 0.56 | N/A | 1.7 |
| 14 | 8937 | 0.42 | N/A | 1.4 |
| 15 | 1193 | 0.45 | 1 | 2.8 |
| Cemented | ||||
| 16 | 6897 | 0.59 | N/A | 0.6 |
| 17 | 14,922 | 0.47 | N/A | 3.6 |
| 18 | 13,041 | 0.51 | N/A | 2.8 |
| 19 | 14,727 | 0.51 | N/A | 3.0 |
| 20 | 9878 | 0.51 | N/A | 2.4 |
| 21 | 32,428 | 0.51 | N/A | 2.1 |
| 22 | 3664 | 0.55 | N/A | 0.2 |
| 23 | 21,098 | 1.05 | 0.86 | 4.9 |
| 24 | 14,164 | 0.7 | 1 | 0.8 |
| 25 | 9610 | 0.7 | 0.83 | 0 |
| 26 | 33,619 | 0.51 | N/A | 0 |
| 27 | 42,675 | 0.69 | N/A | 0.2 |
| 28 | 7902 | 0.42 | 1 | 0.3 |
| 29 | 35,592 | 0.73 | 0.95 | 0.9 |
| 30 | 14,987 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
N/A: Particle characteristic could not be measured appropriately.
Images were taken with High-Resolution Optical Darkfield Microscopy (HR-ODM). Total number of particles, particle density, median equivalent diameter, and median circularity were measured using NIS Elements image analysis software. Polyethylene particles (PE) were counted (total number and particle density) using a polarization microscope with a motorized table.
FIGURE 5Frequency distribution of the equivalent diameter (µm) of the particles counted in the uncemented and cemented cases.
FIGURE 6Polarization microscopy image (H&E, 20×) showing birefringent PE particles (red arrows) in the tissue (case no. 9). Metal degradation products appear in black (green arrows).
FIGURE 7Metal concentration in blood samples, µg/L (medians and quartiles). A: Titanium. B: Zr.