| Literature DB >> 31498470 |
Eemeli Jämsen1,2,3,4, Jukka Pajarinen1,2,3,4, Tzu-Hua Lin1, Chi-Wen Lo1, Akira Nabeshima1, Laura Lu1, Karthik Nathan1, Kari K Eklund2,3,4,5, Zhenyu Yao1, Stuart B Goodman1,6.
Abstract
Macrophage-mediated inflammatory reaction to implant wear particles drives bone loss around total joint replacements (TJR). Although most TJR recipients are elderly, studies linking wear particle-activated macrophages and peri-implant osteolysis have not taken into account the multiple effects that aging has on the innate immune system and, in particular, on macrophages. To address this, we compared the wear particle responses of bone marrow macrophages obtained from young (2-month) and aged (18-month) mice. Macrophages were polarized to M0, M1, or M2 phenotypes in vitro, challenged with titanium particles, and their inflammatory response was characterized at multiple time points by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In addition, age-dependent changes in activation of transcription factor nuclear factor-κB were analyzed by a lentiviral vector-based luciferase reporter system. The particle stimulation experiment was further repeated using human primary macrophages isolated from blood donors of different ages. We found that the pro-inflammatory responses were generally higher in macrophages obtained from young mice, but differences between the age groups remained small and of uncertain biological significance. Noteworthily, M2 polarization effectively suppressed the particle-induced inflammation in both young and aged macrophages. These results suggest that aging of the innate immune system per se plays no significant role in the response of macrophages to titanium particles, whereas induction of M2 polarization appears a promising strategy to limit macrophage-mediated inflammation regardless of age.Entities:
Keywords: aging; macrophage; polarization; titanium; wear particle
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31498470 PMCID: PMC6980287 DOI: 10.1002/jor.24461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Res ISSN: 0736-0266 Impact factor: 3.494