Literature DB >> 26354283

When 1+1>2: Nanostructured composites for hard tissue engineering applications.

Vuk Uskoković1.   

Abstract

Multicomponent, synergistic and multifunctional nanostructures have taken over the spotlight in the realm of biomedical nanotechnologies. The most prospective materials for bone regeneration today are almost exclusively composites comprising two or more components that compensate for the shortcomings of each one of them alone. This is quite natural in view of the fact that all hard tissues in the human body, except perhaps the tooth enamel, are composite nanostructures. This review article highlights some of the most prospective breakthroughs made in this research direction, with the hard tissues in main focus being those comprising bone, tooth cementum, dentin and enamel. The major obstacles to creating collagen/apatite composites modeled after the structure of bone are mentioned, including the immunogenicity of xenogeneic collagen and continuously failing attempts to replicate the biomineralization process in vitro. Composites comprising a polymeric component and calcium phosphate are discussed in light of their ability to emulate the soft/hard composite structure of bone. Hard tissue engineering composites created using hard material components other than calcium phosphates, including silica, metals and several types of nanotubes, are also discoursed on, alongside additional components deliverable using these materials, such as cells, growth factors, peptides, antibiotics, antiresorptive and anabolic agents, pharmacokinetic conjugates and various cell-specific targeting moieties. It is concluded that a variety of hard tissue structures in the body necessitates a similar variety of biomaterials for their regeneration. The ongoing development of nanocomposites for bone restoration will result in smart, theranostic materials, capable of acting therapeutically in direct feedback with the outcome of in situ disease monitoring at the cellular and subcellular scales. Progress in this research direction is expected to take us to the next generation of biomaterials, designed with the purpose of fulfilling Daedalus' dream - not restoring the tissues, but rather augmenting them.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apatite; Bone; Calcium phosphate; Nanoparticle; Scaffold; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26354283      PMCID: PMC4567690          DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  207 in total

1.  Biological organization of hydroxyapatite crystallites into a fibrous continuum toughens and controls anisotropy in human enamel.

Authors:  S N White; W Luo; M L Paine; H Fong; M Sarikaya; M L Snead
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  The resonant recognition model (RRM) predicts amino acid residues in highly conserved regions of the hormone prolactin (PRL).

Authors:  C Hejase de Trad; Q Fang; I Cosic
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2000-04-14       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 3.  Nonallograft osteoconductive bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  Robert W Bucholz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Mathematical modeling of bioerodible, polymeric drug delivery systems.

Authors:  J Siepmann; A Göpferich
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2001-06-11       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Proteins incorporated into biomimetically prepared calcium phosphate coatings modulate their mechanical strength and dissolution rate.

Authors:  Y Liu; E B Hunziker; N X Randall; K de Groot; P Layrolle
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Collagen as an implantable material in medicine and dentistry.

Authors:  Maria G Patino; Mirdza E Neiders; Sebastiano Andreana; Bernice Noble; Robert E Cohen
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Stimulation of bone formation in vitro and in rodents by statins.

Authors:  G Mundy; R Garrett; S Harris; J Chan; D Chen; G Rossini; B Boyce; M Zhao; G Gutierrez
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-12-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Costimulatory molecule expression following exposure to orthopaedic implants wear debris.

Authors:  J A Bainbridge; P A Revell; N Al-Saffar
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001-03-05

Review 9.  The osteoblast: a sophisticated fibroblast under central surveillance.

Authors:  P Ducy; T Schinke; G Karsenty
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Bone-specific delivery and sustained release of diclofenac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, via bisphosphonic prodrug based on the Osteotropic Drug Delivery System (ODDS).

Authors:  H Hirabayashi; T Takahashi; J Fujisaki; T Masunaga; S Sato; J Hiroi; Y Tokunaga; S Kimura; T Hata
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2001-01-29       Impact factor: 9.776

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing regenerative approaches with nanoparticles.

Authors:  Sabine van Rijt; Pamela Habibovic
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Carriers for the tunable release of therapeutics: etymological classification and examples.

Authors:  Vuk Uskoković; Shreya Ghosh
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 6.648

3.  Waiting for Aπαταω: 250 Years Later.

Authors:  Victoria Wu; Vuk Uskoković
Journal:  Found Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 1.238

4.  Chitosan-PLGA polymer blends as coatings for hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and their effect on antimicrobial properties, osteoconductivity and regeneration of osseous tissues.

Authors:  Nenad Ignjatović; Victoria Wu; Zorica Ajduković; Tatjana Mihajilov-Krstev; Vuk Uskoković; Dragan Uskoković
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 7.328

5.  Antimicrobial Hydroxyapatite-Gelatin-Silica Composite Pastes with Tunable Setting Properties.

Authors:  Vuk Uskoković; Shreya Ghosh; Victoria M Wu
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 6.  Antimicrobial and Osseointegration Properties of Nanostructured Titanium Orthopaedic Implants.

Authors:  Marcus Jäger; Herbert P Jennissen; Florian Dittrich; Alfons Fischer; Hedda Luise Köhling
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 7.  The Significance and Utilisation of Biomimetic and Bioinspired Strategies in the Field of Biomedical Material Engineering: The Case of Calcium Phosphat-Protein Template Constructs.

Authors:  Monika Šupová
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  When Nothing Turns Itself Inside out and Becomes Something: Coating Poly(Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid) Spheres with Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles vs. the Other Way Around.

Authors:  Vuk Uskoković; Victoria M Wu
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-07-23

Review 9.  Advanced materials for enamel remineralization.

Authors:  Jiarong Xu; Hui Shi; Jun Luo; Haiyan Yao; Pei Wang; Zhihua Li; Junchao Wei
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-13

10.  Astromimetics: The dawn of a new era for (bio)materials science?

Authors:  Vuk Uskoković; Victoria M Wu
Journal:  Nanobiomedicine (Rij)       Date:  2018-08-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.