| Literature DB >> 25047044 |
Michiel Haeseker1, Thomas Havenith, Leo Stolk, Cees Neef, Cathrien Bruggeman, Annelies Verbon.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pharmacodynamic (PD) efficacy target of amoxicillin is 40% time above the minimal inhibition concentration (40%T > MIC). Recent studies of other antibiotics have shown that PD-efficacy targets are not always reached. The aim of this study was to evaluate the percentage of hospitalised patients, using amoxicillin/clavulanic acid intravenously (iv), that reach the pharmacodynamic efficacy target 40%T > MIC. Additionally, the association of demographic anthropomorphic and clinical parameters with the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of amoxicillin were determined.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25047044 PMCID: PMC4129431 DOI: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-38
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pharmacol Toxicol ISSN: 2050-6511 Impact factor: 2.483
Characteristics of 57 hospitalised patients
| Age in years | 67 (±16) | 69 (23–93) |
| Weight in kg | 78 (±20) | 75 (43–153) |
| Number of blood levels | 3 (±0.9) | 2 (2–5) |
| Amoxicillin iv days | 13 (±9) | 10 (3–57) |
| Admission days | 27 (±34) | 19 (4–188) |
| Gender | Number (percentage) | |
| • Male | 40 (70%) | |
| • Female | 17 (30%) | |
| Infection | Number (percentage) | |
| • Abdominal infection | 28 (49%) | |
| • Wound infection | 10 (17.5%) | |
| • Pneumonia | 6 (11%) | |
| • Urinary tract infection | 3 (5%) | |
| • Other | 10 (17.5%) | |
| Amoxicillin combination | Number (percentage) | |
| • Monotherapy | 44 (78%) | |
| • Ciprofloxacin | 4 (7%) | |
| • Erythromycin | 3 (5%) | |
| • Gentamicin | 3 (5%) | |
| • Othera | 3 (5%) | |
| Co-medication | Number (percentage) | |
| • None | 16 (28%) | |
| • Cardiovascular | 27 (47%) | |
| • Diabetic mellitus | 15 (26%) | |
| • Immunosuppressive | 3 (5%) | |
| • Otherb | 8 (14%) |
aOther: rifampicin, cefuroxim and metronidazol.
bOther: haloperidol, levothyroxine, painkillers, anticoagulant.
Mean (±SD) CLam/W , CLcr , V/W and T½ for amoxicillin in patients using amoxicillin/clavulanic acid broken down per age group
| <70 | 31 | 0.19 (±0.08) | 82 (±25) | 0.30 (±0.06) | 1.26 (±0.44) |
| >70 | 26 | 0.14 (±0.06) | 55 (±19) | 0.32 (±0.08) | 1.83 (±0.71) |
| P-value | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.82 | <0.01 |
aCLam/W: amoxicillin clearance corrected for bodyweight.
bCLcr: creatinine clearance.
cV/W: volume of distribution corrected for bodyweight.
dT½: amoxicillin half life.
Figure 1The measured concentrations of amoxicillin plotted against the time after amoxicillin administration.
Figure 2Correlation between amoxicillin actual measured concentration and estimated with maximum a posteriori Bayesian fitting (MW/Pharm 3.60, Mediware, the Netherlands).
Figure 3The percentage of patients that reach the 40%T > MIC for different age categories at different MICs.
Univariate Pearson correlation coefficients between amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, CLam/W and predictors used in this study
| | | |
|---|---|---|
| Creatinine | -0.584 | <0.001 |
| Age | -0.476 | <0.001 |
| Gender | -0.034 | 0.812 |
| V/W | -0.608 | <0.001 |
| 40%T > MIC | -0.424 | 0.025 |
CLam/W, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid clearance corrected for bodyweight.
V/W, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid volume of distribution corrected for bodyweight.
Figure 4Calculated percentage of patients with 40%T > MIC at different MICs for increasing amoxicillin dosages.