| Literature DB >> 31555237 |
Alasdair T M Hubbard1,2, Nazila V Jafari3, Nicholas Feasey4,5, Jennifer L Rohn3, Adam P Roberts1,2.
Abstract
The fitness cost to bacteria of acquisition of resistance determinants is critically under-investigated, and the identification and exploitation of these fitness costs may lead to novel therapeutic strategies that prevent the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Here we used Escherichia coli and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC) resistance as a model to understand how the artificial environments utilized in studies of bacterial fitness could affect the emergence of resistance and associated fitness costs. Further, we explored the predictive value of this data when strains were grown in the more physiologically relevant environments of urine and urothelial organoids. Resistant E. coli isolates were selected for following 24-h exposure to sub-inhibitory concentrations of AMC in either M9, ISO, or LB, followed by growth on LB agar containing AMC. No resistant colonies emerged following growth in M9, whereas resistant isolates were detected from cultures grown in ISO and LB. We observed both within and between media-type variability in the levels of resistance and fitness of the resistant mutants grown in LB. MICs and fitness of these resistant strains in different media (M9, ISO, LB, human urine, and urothelial organoids) showed considerable variation. Media can therefore have a direct effect on the isolation of mutants that confer resistance to AMC and these mutants can exhibit unpredictable MIC and fitness profiles under different growth conditions. This preliminary study highlights the risks in relying on a single culture protocol as a model system to predict the behavior and treatment response of bacteria in vivo and highlights the importance of developing comprehensive experimental designs to ensure effective translation of diagnostic procedures to successful clinical outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotic resistance; biological cost; evolution; fitness; urethral organoid; urine
Year: 2019 PMID: 31555237 PMCID: PMC6722461 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Escherichia coli isolates used during this study.
| 10129 | Sensitive clinical Malawian isolate. The ancestral strain used for this study. | |
| ISO_2 | AMC-selected derivative of | This study |
| ISO_9 | AMC-selected derivative of | This study |
| ISO_10 | AMC-selected derivative of | This study |
| LB_1 | AMC-selected derivative of | This study |
| LB_2 | AMC-selected derivative of | This study |
| LB_5 | AMC-selected derivative of | This study |
Primer names and primer sequences for confirmation of the SNPs in cpxA and ampC promoter region of E. coli 10129 ancestor and AMC-resistant isolates as predicted by breseq.
| Ec10129_F1 | TGAACGCAGCGAAATGCAGA | |
| Ec10129_R1 | GTGCGCAGTTCGTGAGAGAT | |
| Ec10129_F2 | GGTATTCTGCTGCCGCTAGG | |
| Ec10129_R2 | CCGGGGATCTTTTGTTGCTC |
Minimum inhibitory concentrations of the E. coli 10129 ancestor and AMC-resistant isolates assessed in MHB, LB, ISO, M9, and urine following the CLSI guidelines.
| MHB | 4–8 | 16 | 8–16 | 8–16 | 32 | 64 | 64 |
| LB | 4–8 | 16 | – | – | – | 64–128 | 64 |
| ISO | 8 | 16–32 | – | – | – | 128 | 64–128 |
| M9 | 1–2 | 2–4 | – | – | – | 32 | 16 |
| Urine | 2 | 4 | – | – | – | 64 | 64 |
FIGURE 1Difference in log CFU/ml of E. coli 10129 (A) after growth in LB, ISO, and M9, and (B) following 24-h exposure with sub-inhibitory concentrations of AMC in LB, ISO, and M9 compared to the initial inoculum. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.
FIGURE 2Circular barplot chart displaying the MIC values of the E. coli 10129 ancestor with three evolved derivative strains. The inner circle shows which bars belong to which strains and which media the MICs were tested. Clinical breakpoint for sensitivity and resistance is 8 and 16 μg/ml, respectively, and is indicated by a circle. The scale represents the MIC value.
FIGURE 3Relative fitness and growth of E. coli isolates; error bars represent standard error of the mean. (A) Relative fitness of E. coli 10129 AMC-resistant isolates ISO_2, LB_2, and LB_5 compared to the ancestral isolate in LB. (B) Relative fitness of E. coli 10129 AMC-resistant isolate LB_2 in LB, ISO, and M9 compared to the ancestral isolate in the absence of AMC. (C) Relative fitness of E. coli 10129 AMC-resistant isolate LB_5 in LB, ISO, and M9 compared to the ancestral isolate in the absence of AMC. (D) Relative fitness of E. coli 10129 AMC-resistant isolates ISO_2, LB_2, and LB_5 compared to the ancestral isolate in urothelial organoids.
Summary table of relative fitness assessed of the E. coli 10129 AMC-resistant derivatives compared to the ancestral isolate in LB, ISO, M9, and urothelial organoids; biofilm production measured as optical density at 550 nm; and the nucleotide, amino acid position, and gene in which there were identified SNPs.
| LB | 19.9 ± 5.8 | 14.4 ± 6.4 | 16.6 ± 0.5 |
| ISO | – | 8.7 ± 2.9 | 20.1 ± 1 |
| M9 | – | −6.6 ± 0.7 | 18.6 ± 3.2 |
| Urothelial organoids | −5.6 ± 9.9 | 0.3 ± 12.8 | −6.1 ± 7.4 |
| Biofilm production | 0.101 ± 0.008 | 0.118 ± 0.01 | 0.054 ± 0.002 |
| SNP | CCG → CTG | GTC → GAC | GTC → GAC |
| Amino acid position | P177L | V111D | V111D |
| Gene |
FIGURE 4Biofilm production of E. coli 10129 ancestor and AMC-resistant isolates in M9. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.