| Literature DB >> 25030608 |
Juan Manuel Herrero-Medrano1, Hendrik-Jan Megens, Martien A M Groenen, Mirte Bosse, Miguel Pérez-Enciso, Richard P M A Crooijmans.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A major concern in conservation genetics is to maintain the genetic diversity of populations. Genetic variation in livestock species is threatened by the progressive marginalisation of local breeds in benefit of high-output pigs worldwide. We used high-density SNP and re-sequencing data to assess genetic diversity of local pig breeds from Europe. In addition, we re-sequenced pigs from commercial breeds to identify potential candidate mutations responsible for phenotypic divergence among these groups of breeds.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25030608 PMCID: PMC4117957 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Sampling information and analysis performed in each pig population
| Breed | Code | Category | Country | N | SNP | NGS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| BS | Local | UK | 29 | 29 | 2 |
|
| GO | Local | UK | 33 | 33 | 2 |
|
| LB | Local | UK | 30 | 30 | 1 |
|
| MW | Local | UK | 27 | 27 | 2 |
|
| TA | Local | UK | 30 | 30 | 2 |
|
| CM | Local | Spain | 46 | 46 | 2 |
|
| IB | Local | Spain | 29 | 29 | 2 |
|
| CS | Local | Italy | 13 | 13 | 1 |
|
| CT | Local | Italy | 15 | 15 | 2 |
|
| NS | Local | Italy | 15 | 15 | 0 |
|
| CA | Local | Italy | 15 | 15 | 1 |
|
| MA | Local | Hungary | 25 | 0 | 2 |
|
| DU | Commercial | International | 2 | 0 | 2 |
|
| LW | Commercial | International | 2 | 0 | 2 |
|
| LR | Commercial | International | 2 | 0 | 2 |
|
| PI | Commercial | International | 2 | 0 | 2 |
|
| - | Wild | - | 2 | 0 | 2 |
|
| WB | Wild | China | 3 | 0 | 3 |
|
| WB | Wild | The Netherlands | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Genetic diversity parameters using Porcine SNP60 Beadchip (SNP) and Next generation sequence data (NGS)
| Continent | Category | Population | SNP | NGS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| Local | BS | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.13 | 2.16E-03 |
|
| Local | CA | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 1.62E-03 |
|
| Local | CM | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.17 | 1.87E-03 |
|
| Local | CS | 0.19 | 0.2 | 0.41 | 1.14E-03 |
|
| Local | CT | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 1.27E-03 |
|
| Local | GO | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.34 | 1.45E-03 |
|
| Local | IB | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 1.34E-03 |
|
| Local | LB | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 1.86E-03 |
|
| Local | MA | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.55 | 7.58E-04 |
|
| Local | MW | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 1.81E-03 |
|
| Local | TA | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.38 | 1.45E-03 |
|
| Commercial | DU | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 1.63E-03 |
|
| Commercial | LR | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.16 | 2.07E-03 |
|
| Commercial | LW | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.19 | 1.82E-03 |
|
| Commercial | PI | 0.31 | 0.3 | 0.16 | 2.09E-03 |
|
| Wild | WB_NL | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.55 | 1.01E-03 |
|
| Wild | WB_NCH | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.53 | 2.96E-03 |
|
| Wild | WB_SCH | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.45 | 3.49E-03 |
|
| Local | MS | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.53 | 2.54E-03 |
Ho: Observed heterozygosity; He: expected heterozygosity; F: inbreeding coefficient; Het: Heterozygosity estimated using NGS data [15].
Figure 1Comparison of genetic diversity estimated with NGS and 60K-SNP data. (A) Heterozygosity (Het) with NGS Vs. Observed heterozygosity (Ho) using 60K data at population level in local breeds. Each dot represents the average value in the populations. The size of the dots are proportional to the inbreeding coefficient (F) observed in the population. (B) Heterozygosity (Het) with NGS Vs. Inbreeding coefficient (F) using 60K data at individual level. Each dot represents a single pig. The size of the dots is proportional to the Ho using 60K at population level. The line that best fit the estimates in European pigs is displayed. The lack of correlation observed in Asian pigs indicates high ascertainment bias.
Figure 2Comparative analysis of the percentage of the genome covered by ROH in each breed. Estimations using NGS are represented in blue and estimations using 60K data in red.
Figure 3Chromosomes 3, 6 and 18 are arranged circularly end-to-end using Circos[23]. From inside to outside, the four inner rings display ROH (green and blue bars) and genetic diversity (red histograms) in Large White, Landrace, Mangalica and Tamworth respectively. Some QTLs overlapping any of the four genes studied are represented in yellow (QTL1: Abdominal fat weight; QTL2: Osteochondrosis score; QTL3: Intramuscular fat content; QTL4: Backfat thickness; QTL5: Feet and leg conformation; QTL6: Vertebra number. The outer ring represents the averaged high-density recombination map described by Tortereau et al. [24].