Literature DB >> 18981413

Genome-wide assessment of worldwide chicken SNP genetic diversity indicates significant absence of rare alleles in commercial breeds.

William M Muir1, Gane Ka-Shu Wong, Yong Zhang, Jun Wang, Martien A M Groenen, Richard P M A Crooijmans, Hendrik-Jan Megens, Huanmin Zhang, Ron Okimoto, Addie Vereijken, Annemieke Jungerius, Gerard A A Albers, Cindy Taylor Lawley, Mary E Delany, Sean MacEachern, Hans H Cheng.   

Abstract

Breed utilization, genetic improvement, and industry consolidation are predicted to have major impacts on the genetic composition of commercial chickens. Consequently, the question arises as to whether sufficient genetic diversity remains within industry stocks to address future needs. With the chicken genome sequence and more than 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), it is now possible to address biodiversity using a previously unattainable metric: missing alleles. To achieve this assessment, 2551 informative SNPs were genotyped on 2580 individuals, including 1440 commercial birds. The proportion of alleles lacking in commercial populations was assessed by (1) estimating the global SNP allele frequency distribution from a hypothetical ancestral population as a reference, then determining the portion of the distribution lost, and then (2) determining the relationship between allele loss and the inbreeding coefficient. The results indicate that 50% or more of the genetic diversity in ancestral breeds is absent in commercial pure lines. The missing genetic diversity resulted from the limited number of incorporated breeds. As such, hypothetically combining stocks within a company could recover only preexisting within-breed variability, but not more rare ancestral alleles. We establish that SNP weights act as sentinels of biodiversity and provide an objective assessment of the strains that are most valuable for preserving genetic diversity. This is the first experimental analysis investigating the extant genetic diversity of virtually an entire agricultural commodity. The methods presented are the first to characterize biodiversity in terms of allelic diversity and to objectively link rate of allele loss with the inbreeding coefficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18981413      PMCID: PMC2582254          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0806569105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  22 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mosaicism of Solid Gold supports the causality of a noncoding A-to-G transition in the determinism of the callipyge phenotype.

Authors:  Maria Smit; Karin Segers; Laura Garcia Carrascosa; Tracy Shay; Francesca Baraldi; Gabor Gyapay; Gary Snowder; Michel Georges; Noelle Cockett; Carole Charlier
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Correcting for ascertainment biases when analyzing SNP data: applications to the estimation of linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Rasmus Nielsen; James Signorovitch
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Growth, livability, and feed conversion of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets.

Authors:  G B Havenstein; P R Ferket; M A Qureshi
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Characterization and conservation of genetic diversity in subdivided populations.

Authors:  M A Toro; A Caballero
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Statistical tests for detecting positive selection by utilizing high-frequency variants.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Yun-Xin Fu; Suhua Shi; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Associations of individual genomic heterozygosity, estimated by molecular fingerprinting, and of dam major histocompatibility complex with growth and egg production traits in layer chickens.

Authors:  A Cahaner; E J Smith; S Swenson; S J Lamont
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  76 in total

Review 1.  Sustainable intensification of indigenous village chicken production system: matching the genotype with the environment.

Authors:  Takele Taye Desta
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Bayesian inference of genetic parameters based on conditional decompositions of multivariate normal distributions.

Authors:  Jon Hallander; Patrik Waldmann; Chunkao Wang; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Deciphering the genetic basis of animal domestication.

Authors:  Pamela Wiener; Samantha Wilkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Diversity and evolution of the highly polymorphic tandem repeat LEI0258 in the chicken MHC-B region.

Authors:  Olympe Chazara; Chi-Sheng Chang; Nicolas Bruneau; Khalid Benabdeljelil; Jean-Claude Fotsa; Boniface B Kayang; N'Goran E Loukou; Richard Osei-Amponsah; Valentine Yapi-Gnaore; Issaka A K Youssao; Chih-Feng Chen; Marie-Hélène Pinard-van der Laan; Michèle Tixier-Boichard; Bertrand Bed'hom
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.846

5.  The origin and genetic variation of domestic chickens with special reference to junglefowls Gallus g. gallus and G. varius.

Authors:  Hiromi Sawai; Hie Lim Kim; Kaori Kuno; Sayaka Suzuki; Hideo Gotoh; Masaru Takada; Naoyuki Takahata; Yoko Satta; Fumihito Akishinonomiya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of linkage disequilibrium and haplotype diversity on macro- and microchromosomes in chicken.

Authors:  Hendrik-Jan Megens; Richard P M A Crooijmans; John W M Bastiaansen; Hindrik H D Kerstens; Albart Coster; Ruud Jalving; Addie Vereijken; Pradeepa Silva; William M Muir; Hans H Cheng; Olivier Hanotte; Martien A M Groenen
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-12-20       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  A quantitative trait locus for ascites on chromosome 9 in broiler chicken lines.

Authors:  Sriram Krishnamoorthy; Candace D Smith; Adnan A Al-Rubaye; Gisela F Erf; Robert F Wideman; Nicholas B Anthony; Douglas D Rhoads
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Rapid genomic characterization of the genus vitis.

Authors:  Sean Myles; Jer-Ming Chia; Bonnie Hurwitz; Charles Simon; Gan Yuan Zhong; Edward Buckler; Doreen Ware
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Single nucleotide polymorphism discovery in rainbow trout by deep sequencing of a reduced representation library.

Authors:  Cecilia Castaño Sánchez; Timothy P L Smith; Ralph T Wiedmann; Roger L Vallejo; Mohamed Salem; Jianbo Yao; Caird E Rexroad
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.