Literature DB >> 19368642

Population genomics of the inbred Scandinavian wolf.

Jenny Hagenblad1, Maria Olsson, Heidi G Parker, Elaine A Ostrander, Hans Ellegren.   

Abstract

The Scandinavian wolf population represents one of the genetically most well-characterized examples of a severely bottlenecked natural population (with only two founders), and of how the addition of new genetic material (one immigrant) can at least temporarily provide a 'genetic rescue'. However, inbreeding depression has been observed in this population and in the absence of additional immigrants, its long-term viability is questioned. To study the effects of inbreeding and selection on genomic diversity, we performed a genomic scan with approximately 250 microsatellite markers distributed across all autosomes and the X chromosome. We found linkage disequilibrium (LD) that extended up to distances of 50 Mb, exceeding that of most outbreeding species studied thus far. LD was particularly pronounced on the X chromosome. Overall levels of observed genomic heterozygosity did not deviate significantly from simulations based on known population history, giving no support for a general selection for heterozygotes. However, we found evidence supporting balancing selection at a number of loci and also evidence suggesting directional selection at other loci. For markers on chromosome 23, the signal of selection was particularly strong, indicating that purifying selection against deleterious alleles may have occurred even in this very small population. These data suggest that population genomics allows the exploration of the effects of neutral and non-neutral evolution on a finer scale than what has previously been possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19368642      PMCID: PMC2747086          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04120.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  42 in total

1.  Rescue of a severely bottlenecked wolf (Canis lupus) population by a single immigrant.

Authors:  Carles Vilà; Anna-Karin Sundqvist; Øystein Flagstad; Jennifer Seddon; Susanne Björnerfeldt; Ilpo Kojola; Adriano Casulli; Håkan Sand; Petter Wabakken; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans.

Authors:  Mark A Beaumont; David J Balding
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  SNPs in ecological and conservation studies: a test in the Scandinavian wolf population.

Authors:  J M Seddon; H G Parker; E A Ostrander; H Ellegren
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  A haplotype map of the human genome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Genomics and conservation genetics.

Authors:  Michael H Kohn; William J Murphy; Elaine A Ostrander; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Severe inbreeding depression in a wild wolf (Canis lupus) population.

Authors:  Olof Liberg; Henrik Andrén; Hans-Christian Pedersen; Håkan Sand; Douglas Sejberg; Petter Wabakken; Mikael Kesson; Staffan Bensch
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Chromosome-specific single-locus FISH probes allow anchorage of an 1800-marker integrated radiation-hybrid/linkage map of the domestic dog genome to all chromosomes.

Authors:  M Breen; S Jouquand; C Renier; C S Mellersh; C Hitte; N G Holmes; A Chéron; N Suter; F Vignaux; A E Bristow; C Priat; E McCann; C André; S Boundy; P Gitsham; R Thomas; W L Bridge; H F Spriggs; E J Ryder; A Curson; J Sampson; E A Ostrander; M M Binns; F Galibert
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The dog genome: survey sequencing and comparative analysis.

Authors:  Ewen F Kirkness; Vineet Bafna; Aaron L Halpern; Samuel Levy; Karin Remington; Douglas B Rusch; Arthur L Delcher; Mihai Pop; Wei Wang; Claire M Fraser; J Craig Venter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog.

Authors:  Heidi G Parker; Lisa V Kim; Nathan B Sutter; Scott Carlson; Travis D Lorentzen; Tiffany B Malek; Gary S Johnson; Hawkins B DeFrance; Elaine A Ostrander; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Selection for heterozygosity gives hope to a wild population of inbred wolves.

Authors:  Staffan Bensch; Henrik Andrén; Bengt Hansson; Hans Chr Pedersen; Håkan Sand; Douglas Sejberg; Petter Wabakken; Mikael Akesson; Olof Liberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Genomics and the future of conservation genetics.

Authors:  Fred W Allendorf; Paul A Hohenlohe; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Genomic sweep and potential genetic rescue during limiting environmental conditions in an isolated wolf population.

Authors:  Jennifer R Adams; Leah M Vucetich; Philip W Hedrick; Rolf O Peterson; John A Vucetich
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Choosy Wolves? Heterozygote Advantage But No Evidence of MHC-Based Disassortative Mating.

Authors:  Marco Galaverni; Romolo Caniglia; Pietro Milanesi; Silvana Lapalombella; Elena Fabbri; Ettore Randi
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.645

Review 4.  Fifteen years of genomewide scans for selection: trends, lessons and unaddressed genetic sources of complication.

Authors:  Ryan J Haasl; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 5.  What can livestock breeders learn from conservation genetics and vice versa?

Authors:  Torsten N Kristensen; Ary A Hoffmann; Cino Pertoldi; Astrid V Stronen
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  RAD Sequencing and a Hybrid Antarctic Fur Seal Genome Assembly Reveal Rapidly Decaying Linkage Disequilibrium, Global Population Structure and Evidence for Inbreeding.

Authors:  Emily Humble; Kanchon K Dasmahapatra; Alvaro Martinez-Barrio; Inês Gregório; Jaume Forcada; Ann-Christin Polikeit; Simon D Goldsworthy; Michael E Goebel; Jörn Kalinowski; Jochen B W Wolf; Joseph I Hoffman
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Inbreeding depression causes reduced fecundity in Golden Retrievers.

Authors:  Erin T Chu; Missy J Simpson; Kelly Diehl; Rodney L Page; Aaron J Sams; Adam R Boyko
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  The evolutionary history of grey wolf Y chromosomes.

Authors:  Linnéa Smeds; Ilpo Kojola; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Whole-genome sequence analysis reveals differences in population management and selection of European low-input pig breeds.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Herrero-Medrano; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Martien A M Groenen; Mirte Bosse; Miguel Pérez-Enciso; Richard P M A Crooijmans
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.