Literature DB >> 22109589

[What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics].

S Gravius1, T Randau, D C Wirtz.   

Abstract

Revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty is increasing steadily in numbers. These procedures demand high performance from both the treating surgeon as well as the implants used. Novel developments from basic research and industrial partners extend the possibilities for treating affected patients. This article gives an overview of the state of the art in revision hip arthroplasty: new techniques and trends are outlined and presented.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 22109589     DOI： 10.1007/s00132-011-1844-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN： 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  45 in total

Review 1.  Potential of coatings in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Reijo Lappalainen; Seppo S Santavirta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Surface coating to improve the metal-cement bonding in cemented femur stems.

Authors:  T Mumme; R Marx; R Müller-Rath; C H Siebert; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Amphiphilic bonder improves adhesion at the acrylic bone cement-bone interface of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty: in vivo tests in an ovine model.

Authors:  Ralf Müller-Rath; Dieter C Wirtz; Christian H Siebert; Stefan Andereya; Sascha Gravius; Benita Hermanns-Sachweh; Rudolf Marx; Torsten Mumme
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  [Bone allografting].

Authors:  B-D Katthagen; A Prub
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Cementless acetabular revision. Evaluation at an average of 10.5 years.

Authors:  S S Leopold; A G Rosenberg; R D Bhatt; M B Sheinkop; L R Quigley; J O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B F Kavanagh; D M Ilstrup; R H Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  High failure rate of bulk femoral head allografts in total hip acetabular reconstructions at 10 years.

Authors:  L M Kwong; M Jasty; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Comparison of one and two-stage revision of total hip arthroplasty complicated by infection: a Markov expected-utility decision analysis.

Authors:  Christopher F Wolf; Ning Yan Gu; Jason N Doctor; Paul A Manner; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Decreased dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty using larger femoral head size and posterior capsular repair.

Authors:  Matthew T Hummel; Arthur L Malkani; Madhusudhan R Yakkanti; Dale L Baker
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Classification and reconstruction in revision acetabular arthroplasty with bone stock deficiency.

Authors:  D Garbuz; E Morsi; N Mohamed; A E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.176
View more
  8 in total

1.  Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maik Hoberg; Christian Konrads; Jana Engelien; Dorothee Oschmann; Michael Holder; Matthias Walcher; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Management of severe periacetabular bone loss combined with pelvic discontinuity in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Max J Friedrich; Jan Schmolders; Robert D Michel; Thomas M Randau; Matthias D Wimmer; Hendrik Kohlhof; Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Biological acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting and an acetabular reconstruction ring].

Authors:  M J Friedrich; S Gravius; J Schmolders; M D Wimmer; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation.

Authors:  Jan Schmolders; Max J Friedrich; Robert D Michel; Thomas M Randau; Matthias D Wimmer; Andreas C Strauss; Hendrik Kohlhof; Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Bone defect adjusted strategy in revision arthroplasty of the hip : Wich implant in wich situation? Innovations and approved methods].

Authors:  B S Craiovan; J Grifka; A Keshmiri; B Moser; M Wörner; T Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  [Biological downsizing : Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  S Koob; S Scheidt; T M Randau; M Gathen; M D Wimmer; D C Wirtz; S Gravius
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Can hip resurfacing be safely revised with short-stem total hip arthroplasty? A case series of six patients.

Authors:  Marcel Coutandin; Yama Afghanyar; Philipp Drees; Jens Dargel; Philipp Rehbein; Karl Philipp Kutzner
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-26

8.  Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem: 5- to 16-year results of 163 cases.

Authors:  Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius; Rudolf Ascherl; Miguel Thorweihe; Raimund Forst; Ulrich Noeth; Uwe M Maus; Matthias D Wimmer; Günther Zeiler; Moritz C Deml
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.717
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.