Literature DB >> 28074234

[Biological downsizing : Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty].

S Koob1, S Scheidt1, T M Randau1, M Gathen1, M D Wimmer1, D C Wirtz1, S Gravius2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periacetabular bony defects remain a great challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty. After assessment and classification of the defect and selection of a suitable implant the primary stable fixation and sufficient biological reconstitution of a sustainable bone stock are essential for long term success in acetabular revision surgery. Biological defect reconstruction aims for the down-sizing of periacetabular defects for later revision surgeries. TECHNIQUE: In the field of biological augmentation several methods are currently available. Autologous transplants feature a profound osseointegrative capacity. However, limitations such as volume restrictions and secondary complications at the donor site have to be considered. Structural allografts show little weight bearing potential in the long term and high failure rates. In clinical practice, the usage of spongious chips implanted via impaction bone grafting technique in combination with antiprotrusio cages for the management of contained defects have shown promising long time results. Nevertheless, when dealing with craniolateral acetabular and dorsal column defects, the additional implantation of macroporous metal implants or augments should be considered since biological augmentation has shown little clinical success in these particular cases. PROSPECT: This article provides an overview of the current clinically available biological augmentation methods of peri-acetabular defects. Due to the limitations of autologous and allogeneic bone transplants in terms of size and availability, the emerging field of innovative implantable tissue engineering constructs gains interest and will also be discussed in this article.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous transplants; Hip prosthesis; Homografts; Revision total hip arthroplasty; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28074234     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-016-3379-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  45 in total

Review 1.  [What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics].

Authors:  S Gravius; T Randau; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Impaction bone grafting for the reconstruction of large bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Rudert; B M Holzapfel; E von Rottkay; D E Holzapfel; U Noeth
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 3.  The ABCs of BMPs.

Authors:  Scott D Boden
Journal:  Orthop Nurs       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.913

Review 4.  An update on recent advances in bone regeneration.

Authors:  Panayotis N Soucacos; Elizabeth O Johnson; George Babis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Management of severe periacetabular bone loss combined with pelvic discontinuity in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Max J Friedrich; Jan Schmolders; Robert D Michel; Thomas M Randau; Matthias D Wimmer; Hendrik Kohlhof; Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation.

Authors:  Jan Schmolders; Max J Friedrich; Robert D Michel; Thomas M Randau; Matthias D Wimmer; Andreas C Strauss; Hendrik Kohlhof; Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Uncemented acetabular components with femoral head autograft for acetabular reconstruction in developmental dysplasia of the hip: a concise follow-up report at a mean of twenty years.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Louis S Stryker; Robert T Trousdale; Daniel J Berry; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Rinsing morselized allografts improves bone and tissue ingrowth.

Authors:  Sanne van der Donk; Tim Weernink; Pieter Buma; Per Aspenberg; Tom J J H Slooff; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Classification and reconstruction in revision acetabular arthroplasty with bone stock deficiency.

Authors:  D Garbuz; E Morsi; N Mohamed; A E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  [Complications after harvesting of autologous bone from the ventral and dorsal iliac crest - a prospective, controlled study].

Authors:  C Niedhart; A Pingsmann; C Jürgens; A Marr; R Blatt; F U Niethard
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [The minimally invasive AMIS technique for total hip replacement : Video article].

Authors:  Hans Gollwitzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Calcium Phosphate Bone Graft Substitutes with High Mechanical Load Capacity and High Degree of Interconnecting Porosity.

Authors:  Georg Hettich; Ronja A Schierjott; Matthias Epple; Uwe Gbureck; Sascha Heinemann; Hadi Mozaffari-Jovein; Thomas M Grupp
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.