Literature DB >> 25027020

Vaginal hysterectomy: past, present, and future.

Michael D Moen1, Holly E Richter.   

Abstract

Vaginal hysterectomy is the oldest and least invasive of the hysterectomy techniques and fulfills the evidence-based requirements as the preferred route of hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease. Currently, vaginal hysterectomy is commonly utilized for treating uterine prolapse, but despite proven safety and effectiveness, the use of vaginal hysterectomy for treating non-prolapse conditions has been and remains underutilized in surgical practice. Improving the use of vaginal hysterectomy in the future will likely depend on addressing the key issues of training and maintaining skills in the technique and increasing awareness of the scientific evidence supporting its use.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25027020     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2459-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  30 in total

1.  A national survey of senior trainees surgical experience in hysterectomy and attitudes to the place of vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Tariq Miskry; Adam Magos
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Assessing current trends in resident hysterectomy training.

Authors:  Danielle Burkett; Joanna Horwitz; Vanessa Kennedy; Darby Murphy; Scott Graziano; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.091

3.  Effect of surgical volume on route of hysterectomy and short-term morbidity.

Authors:  Leslie R Boyd; Akiva P Novetsky; John P Curtin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  AAGL position statement: route of hysterectomy to treat benign uterine disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 4.137

5.  The effect of surgeon volume on outcomes and resource use for vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Lisa J Rogo-Gupta; Sharyn N Lewin; Jin Hee Kim; William M Burke; Xuming Sun; Thomas J Herzog; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  FINHYST 2006--national prospective 1-year survey of 5,279 hysterectomies.

Authors:  Tea H I Brummer; Jyrki Jalkanen; Jaana Fraser; Anna-Mari Heikkinen; Minna Kauko; Juha Mäkinen; Ulla Puistola; Jari Sjöberg; Eija Tomás; Päivi Härkki
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

Authors:  R C Dicker; J R Greenspan; L T Strauss; M R Cowart; M J Scally; H B Peterson; F DeStefano; G L Rubin; H W Ory
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Randomized trial of preemptive local analgesia in vaginal surgery.

Authors:  Jaime B Long; Rhonda J Eiland; Joseph G Hentz; Pamela A Mergens; Paul M Magtibay; Rosanne M C Kho; Javier F Magrina; Jeffrey L Cornella
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-10-02

10.  Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches.

Authors:  Vanessa L Jacoby; Amy Autry; Gavin Jacobson; Robert Domush; Sanae Nakagawa; Alison Jacoby
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  7 in total

1.  Vaginal hysterectomy and training: response to Melendez.

Authors:  Michael D Moen; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Vaginal hysterectomy and training.

Authors:  Joan Melendez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Trends in prolapse surgery in England.

Authors:  Martino Maria Zacche; Sambit Mukhopadhyay; Ilias Giarenis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Non-decent Vaginal Hysterectomy in Rural Setup of MP: A Poor Acceptance.

Authors:  Sapna B Jain; Kshma D Chandrakar
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-03-12

5.  Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seung Hyun Lee; So Ra Oh; Yeon Jean Cho; Myoungseok Han; Jung-Woo Park; Su Jin Kim; Jeong Hye Yun; Sun Yi Choe; Joong Sub Choi; Jong Woon Bae
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Vaginal hysterectomy, vaginal salpingoophorectomy and uterosacral ligament colpopexy: a view from above (in English and Spanish).

Authors:  Lauren N Siff; Karl Jallad; Javier Pizarro-Berdichevsky; Mark D Walters
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.