Literature DB >> 27651653

Non-decent Vaginal Hysterectomy in Rural Setup of MP: A Poor Acceptance.

Sapna B Jain1, Kshma D Chandrakar1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: NDVH is a minimally invasive, safe, effective, and economical surgery. Still AH is preferred for benign gynaecological indications. Our study aims to promote NDVH in all technically possible cases by adequate counselling of the patient.
METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled 100 women seeking hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions (excluding prolapse) in a teaching hospital. Women were counselled on the basis of 'PREPARED' questionnaire to assess their awareness about NDVH and were offered NDVH as the proposed surgery and result is analysed.
RESULTS: We observed that there was a little awareness about NDVH and its outcome among the subjects. Ten out of 100 patients refused to perform NDVH after counselling and underwent TAH. Rest of the 90 patients opted for NDVH. Forty out of 90 patients were aware about NDVH, but they were sceptical about the outcome, and 50 were totally unaware. After applying 'PREPARED' questionnaire and counselling, we could motivate them to accept NDVH. It was successful in all cases except one where laparotomy was done for ovarian artery retraction. With no significant post-operative complications, early return to routine activity and low cost of surgery, all patients were satisfied with surgical outcome and improved quality of life.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that patients accept the surgery with open mind after proper counselling and detailing of the procedure. Most of the abdominal hysterectomy can be converted successfully to NDVH in technically feasible cases by experienced hands so adequate training to gynaecology residents is the need of the time. NDVH is economical to the patient as well as for the healthcare system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Counselling; Economic; NDVH; PREPARED; Rural

Year:  2016        PMID: 27651653      PMCID: PMC5016454          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-016-0858-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  22 in total

1.  The effect of surgeon volume on outcomes and resource use for vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Lisa J Rogo-Gupta; Sharyn N Lewin; Jin Hee Kim; William M Burke; Xuming Sun; Thomas J Herzog; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Deciding the route for hysterectomy: Indian triage system.

Authors:  Alokananda Ray; Luna Pant; Navneet Magon
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-06-11

3.  Underutilization of vaginal hysterectomy and its impact on residency training.

Authors:  Amaka N Ocheke; C C Ekwempu; J Musa
Journal:  West Afr J Med       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct

4.  Vaginal hysterectomy following previous cesarean section.

Authors:  S S Sheth; A N Malpani
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Abdominal vs vaginal hysterectomy: a comparative study of the postoperative quality of life and satisfaction.

Authors:  Agnaldo L Silva-Filho; Rogéria Andrade Werneck; Rúbia Sena de Magalhães; Andrezza V Belo; Sérgio A Triginelli
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Vaginal hysterectomy in nulliparous women without prolapse: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Aubert Agostini; Florence Bretelle; Ludovic Cravello; Anne Sophie Maisonneuve; Valérie Roger; Bernard Blanc
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

Authors:  R C Dicker; J R Greenspan; L T Strauss; M R Cowart; M J Scally; H B Peterson; F DeStefano; G L Rubin; H W Ory
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Hospital costs of total vaginal hysterectomy compared with other minimally invasive hysterectomy.

Authors:  Sandra Dayaratna; Jay Goldberg; Christine Harrington; Benjamin E Leiby; Jean M McNeil
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Hysterectomy for benign uterine pathology among women without previous vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Arnaud Le Tohic; Caroline Dhainaut; Chadi Yazbeck; Corinne Hallais; Ishai Levin; Patrick Madelenat
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Anne Lethaby; Emma Tavender; Elizabeth Curr; Ray Garry; Sabine van Voorst; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.