Literature DB >> 7148906

Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

R C Dicker, J R Greenspan, L T Strauss, M R Cowart, M J Scally, H B Peterson, F DeStefano, G L Rubin, H W Ory.   

Abstract

Although hysterectomy was the most frequently performed major surgical procedure among women of reproductive age during the past decade, few recent studies have been conducted to determine the risk of complications. We examined data from the Collaborative Review of Sterilization, a prospective, multicenter, observational study coordinated by the Centers for Disease Control, to assess the comparative risks of complications among women undergoing hysterectomy by the abdominal and vaginal approaches. Between September, 1978, and August, 1981, 1,851 women from nine institutions were included in the study. Women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy experienced significantly fewer complications than women who had undergone abdominal hysterectomy. The difference was probably attributable to the prevalence and efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic use among the former group. Vaginal hysterectomy was associated with more unintended major surgical procedures but less febrile morbidity, bleeding requiring transfusion, hospitalization, and convalescence than abdominal hysterectomy. Vaginal hysterectomy with prophylactic antibiotics should be strongly considered for those women of reproductive age for whom either surgical approach is clinically appropriate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Factors; Americas; Blacks; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Diseases; Educational Status; Employment Status; Gynecologic Surgery; Hysterectomy--complications; Morbidity; Mortality; North America; Northern America; Nulliparity; Population; Population Dynamics; Surgery; Treatment; United States; Urogenital Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7148906     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90362-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  47 in total

1.  A systematic arrangement of laparoscopic total abdominal hysterectomy: a new technique.

Authors:  A Ostrzenski
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  A retrospective cohort study of perioperative management on the morbidity of urogynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Eddie H M Sze; Preiya Jain; Gerry Hobbs
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Managing menorrhagia.

Authors:  A Coulter; A Long; J Kelland; S O'Meara; M Sculpher; F Song; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-09

4.  Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Sandhyasri Panda; Ashok Kumar Behera; M Jayalakshmi; T Narasinga Rao; G Indira
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-05-24

5.  Routine prophylactic oophorectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Sheth; A Malpani
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  A radiological study on the anatomical proximity of the ureters and the cervix.

Authors:  Ofer Gemer; Ala Simonovsky; Michael Huerta; Viki Kapustian; Eyal Anteby; Lina Linov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-01-13

Review 7.  Evisceration after enterocele repair: a rare complication of vaginal surgery.

Authors:  H S Virtanen; E Ekholm; P J Kiilholma
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1996

Review 8.  Management of menorrhagia.

Authors:  A L Magos
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-16

9.  Minilaparotomically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Yu-Duk Choi; Soon-Pyo Lee; Young-Won Cha; Jang Yeul Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound for the treatment of uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Amy K O'Sullivan; David Thompson; Paula Chu; David W Lee; Elizabeth A Stewart; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.188

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.