Literature DB >> 21099600

The effect of surgeon volume on outcomes and resource use for vaginal hysterectomy.

Lisa J Rogo-Gupta1, Sharyn N Lewin, Jin Hee Kim, William M Burke, Xuming Sun, Thomas J Herzog, Jason D Wright.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of surgical volume on outcomes and resource use in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy.
METHODS: Women who underwent total vaginal hysterectomy and were registered in the Perspective database were examined. Perspective is a nationwide database developed to measure quality and resource use. Procedure-associated intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative medical complications as well as hospital readmission, length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) use, operating time, and cost were analyzed. Based on the overall gynecologic surgical volume and vaginal surgical volume of their surgeons, patients were stratified into tertiles. Complications were compared using adjusted generalized estimating equations and reported as odds ratios (ORs).
RESULTS: A total of 77,109 patients operated on by 6,195 gynecologic surgeons were identified. After adjustment for the effects of other demographic variables and concomitant procedures, patients operated on by high-volume vaginal surgeons were 31% (OR 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.80) less likely to experience an operative injury, whereas perioperative complications were reduced by 19% (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.72-0.92), medical complications decreased by 24% (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67-0.86), ICU admission reduced by 46% (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.43-0.73), and the transfusion rate decreased by 28% (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.61-0.85) in patients treated by high-volume vaginal surgeons, whereas rates of readmission were higher (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.04-1.47) in patients treated by high-volume surgeons. Operative times were lower in patients operated on by high-volume surgeons (P<.001). Although total gynecologic surgical volume had no effect on cost, patients treated by high-volume vaginal surgeons had lower costs (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Perioperative morbidity and resource use are lower in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy when the procedure is performed by high-volume vaginal surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21099600     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fca8c5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  26 in total

1.  Open abdominal surgery: a diminishing art.

Authors:  Paul Riss; George Ralph; Peter Dwyer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Safely Increase the Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Rate: A Novel Three-Tiered Preoperative Categorization System Can Predict the Difficulty for Benign Disease.

Authors:  Esteban Andryjowicz; Teresa B Wray; V Reinaldo Ruiz; James Rudolf; Sara Noroozkhani; Sandra Crowder; Jeff M Slezak
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015-07-24

Review 3.  Vaginal Hysterectomy: The Present Past.

Authors:  Dionysios K Veronikis
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

4.  Changes in Surgical Volume and Outcomes Over Time for Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Maria P Ruiz; Ling Chen; Lisa R Gabor; Ana I Tergas; Caryn M St Clair; June Y Hou; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Use of guideline-based antibiotic prophylaxis in women undergoing gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Khalid Hassan; Cande V Ananth; Thomas J Herzog; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Influence of treatment center and hospital volume on survival for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Yongmei Huang; Cande V Ananth; Ana I Tergas; Cassandra Duffy; Israel Deutsch; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Safety and tolerance of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Erin M George; Ana I Tergas; Cande V Ananth; William M Burke; Sharyn N Lewin; Eri Prendergast; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Why do we argue about route of hysterectomy? A call for dialogue.

Authors:  Andrew J Walter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Vaginal hysterectomy: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Michael D Moen; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Trends and Factors Influencing Inpatient Prolapse Surgical Costs and Length of Stay in the United States.

Authors:  Tatiana V D Sanses; Nicholas K Schiltz; Holly E Richter; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.