Literature DB >> 22453103

Assessing current trends in resident hysterectomy training.

Danielle Burkett1, Joanna Horwitz, Vanessa Kennedy, Darby Murphy, Scott Graziano, Kimberly Kenton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: : Our survey assessed the current trends in hysterectomy experience in US obstetrics and gynecology (OG) residency programs and residents' and program directors' perceptions of robotic surgery's effect on surgical training.
METHODS: : An online survey was e-mailed to program directors and graduating residents of 42 US OG programs.
RESULTS: A total of 21 program directors and 35 graduating residents responded. There was no significant difference between the number of hysterectomies residents and program directors thought should be performed. Only 38.1% of program directors and 27.8% of residents reported graduating residents as being "completely prepared" to perform a vaginal hysterectomy compared with 76.2% and 58.3% for abdominal, 28.6% and 22.2% for laparoscopic, and 0% and 2.8% for robotic hysterectomies. Only 12.1% of graduating residents and 17.7% of program directors reported residents sitting at the console "often" or "always" during robotic surgery. Only 34.3% of residents plan to perform robotic hysterectomy after graduation. Both residents (77.2%) and program directors (71.5%) reported that robotic surgery is having a negative impact on residents' training nationally.
CONCLUSIONS: : Graduating residents report adequate numbers of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies. Both residents and program directors report that graduating residents are not prepared to perform all types of hysterectomies. Both residents and program directors express concern that robotic surgery is negatively impacting surgical training. Further efforts are needed to ensure that residents are graduating with surgical proficiency in these basic gynecologic procedures.

Year:  2011        PMID: 22453103     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182309a22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  12 in total

Review 1.  Vaginal Hysterectomy: The Present Past.

Authors:  Dionysios K Veronikis
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

2.  Laparoscopic and robotic skills are transferable in a simulation setting: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lauren Thomaier; Megan Orlando; Melinda Abernethy; Chandhana Paka; Chi Chiung Grace Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Validation of an educational simulation model for vaginal hysterectomy training: a pilot study.

Authors:  Douglas Miyazaki; Catherine A Matthews; Mujan Varasteh Kia; Amr Sherif El Haraki; Noah Miyazaki; Chi Chiung Grace Chen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Vaginal hysterectomy: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Michael D Moen; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Progressive reduction in abdominal hysterectomy rates: impact of laparoscopy, robotics and surgeon factors.

Authors:  Michael Moen; Michael Noone; Aarathi Cholkeri-Singh; Brett Vassallo; Brian Locker; Charles Miller
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-06-11

6.  National survey of urogynecological practice patterns among United States OB/GYN oral board examinees in different practice settings.

Authors:  Andrey Petrikovets; Abigail Davenport; Sherif A El-Nashar; David Sheyn; Jeffrey Mangel; Sangeeta T Mahajan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Entry into the anterior cul-de-sac during vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Outcomes of vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy with concomitant pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Douglas Luchristt; Kimberly Kenton; C Emi Bretschneider
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 1.932

9.  Validation of Transvaginal Hysterectomy Surgical Model - Modification of the Flowerpot Model to Improve Vesicovaginal Plane Simulation.

Authors:  Linda S Burkett; Jennifer Makin; Mary Ackenbom; Amanda Artsen; Megan Bradley
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.314

10.  The impact of training residents on the outcome of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Mohamed A Bedaiwy; Mohamed Abdelrahman; Stephanie Deter; Tarek Farghaly; Mahmoud M Shalaby; Heidi Frasure; Sangeeta Mahajan
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2012-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.