Literature DB >> 25025564

Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.

Maria Regina Guerra Monteiro1, Licinio Esmeraldo da Silva2, Carlos Nelson Elias3, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of archwire material (NiTi, beta-Ti and stainless steel) and brackets design (self-ligating and conventional) on the frictional force resistance.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two types of brackets (self-ligating brackets - Smartclip, 3M/Unitek - and conventional brackets - Gemini, 3M/Unitek) with three (0, 5, and 10 degrees) slot angulation attached with elastomeric ligatures (TP Orthodontics) were tested. All brackets were tested with archwire 0.019"x0.025" nickel-titanium, beta-titanium, and stainless steel (Unitek/3M). The mechanical testing was performed with a universal testing machine eMIC DL 10000 (eMIC Co, Brazil). The wires were pulled from the bracket slots at a cross-head speed of 3 mm/min until 2 mm displacement.
RESULTS: Self-ligating brackets produced significantly lower friction values compared with those of conventional brackets. Frictional force resistance values were directly proportional to the increase in the bracket/ wire angulation. With regard to conventional brackets, stainless steel wires had the lowest friction force values, followed by nickel-titanium and beta-titanium ones. With regard to self-ligating brackets, the nickel-titanium wires had the lowest friction values, significantly lower than those of other materials.
CONCLUSION: even at different angulations, the self-ligating brackets showed significantly lower friction force values than the conventional brackets. Combined with nickel-titanium wires, the self-ligating brackets exhibit much lower friction, possibly due to the contact between nickel-titanium clips and wires of the same material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25025564      PMCID: PMC4072274          DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720130665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci        ISSN: 1678-7757            Impact factor:   2.698


  27 in total

1.  Comparison of frictional resistance in titanium and stainless steel brackets.

Authors:  R Kapur; P K Sinha; R S Nanda
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.

Authors:  Clarice Nishio; Andréa Fonseca Jardim da Motta; Carlos Nelson Elias; José Nelson Mucha
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  In vitro study of frictional forces during sliding mechanics of "reduced-friction" brackets.

Authors:  Meir Redlich; Yaniv Mayer; Doron Harari; Israel Lewinstein
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts.

Authors:  Sandra P Henao; Robert P Kusy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Effect of bracket and wire composition on frictional forces.

Authors:  A J Ireland; M Sherriff; F McDonald
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Root resorption in bicuspid intrusion. A scanning electron microscope study.

Authors:  M R Harry; M R Sims
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.

Authors:  Vittorio Cacciafesta; Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Andrea Ricciardi; Andrea Scribante; Catherine Klersy; Ferdinando Auricchio
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Evaluation of methods of archwire ligation on frictional resistance.

Authors:  Balvinder Khambay; Declan Millett; Siobhan McHugh
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.

Authors:  S Kapila; P V Angolkar; M G Duncanson; R S Nanda
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Effect of applied moment on resistance to sliding among esthetic self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Benjamin T Pliska; Rick W Fuchs; John P Beyer; Brent E Larson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  8 in total

1.  Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.

Authors:  Alexandra Szczupakowski; Susanne Reimann; Cornelius Dirk; Ludger Keilig; Anna Weber; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems' Kinetic Friction: Conventional and Self-Ligating.

Authors:  Aurel-Claudiu Vartolomei; Dan-Cosmin Serbanoiu; Dana-Valentina Ghiga; Marioara Moldovan; Stanca Cuc; Maria Cristina Figueiredo Pollmann; Mariana Pacurar
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 3.  Torque expression in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets: A systematic review.

Authors:  Yousef Al-Thomali; Roshan-Noor Mohamed; Sakeenabi Basha
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-01-01

4.  Comparison of frictional resistance between passive self-ligating brackets and slide-type low-friction ligature brackets during the alignment and leveling stage.

Authors:  Sandra-Liliana Gómez-Gómez; Junes-Abdul Villarraga-Ossa; Juan-Gustavo Diosa-Peña; Juan-Fernando Ortiz-Restrepo; Robinson-Andrés Castrillón-Marín; Carlos M Ardila
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-07-01

5.  Effects of a ceramic active self-ligating bracket on retraction/tipping/ rotation of canine, premolar mesialization, and transverse arch dimensions: A preliminary single-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Moradinejad; Nasim Ghorani; Majid Heidarpour; Meysam Noori; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-10-21

6.  Effect of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) on Alveolar Bone during Maxillary Expansion Using Clear Aligners.

Authors:  Maha Bahammam; Tarek El-Bialy
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  Friction Force Adjustment by an Innovative Covering System Applied with Superelastic NiTi Brackets and Wires-An In-Vitro Study.

Authors:  Andrea Wichelhaus; Tena Eichenberg; Philip Gruber; Elias Panos Bamidis; Thomas Stocker
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.748

8.  Comparisons of maxillary incisor retraction effects for patients with first premolar extractions between Damon Q and Invisalign®: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Jiping Chen; Juan Wen; Ling Huang; Lu Zhang; Lei Han; Huang Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.