Literature DB >> 15132446

Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts.

Sandra P Henao1, Robert P Kusy.   

Abstract

The frictional behavior of four conventional and four self-ligating brackets were simulated using a mechanical testing machine. Analyses of the two-bracket types were completed by drawing samples of three standardized archwires through quadrants of typodont models in the dry/wet states. Pretreatment typodonts of an oral cavity featured progressively malocclused quadrants. As nominal dimensions of the archwires were increased, the drawing forces of all brackets increased at different rates. When coupled with a small wire, the self-ligating brackets performed better than the conventional brackets. For the 0.014-inch wires in the upper right quadrant, the maximum drawing forces averaged 125 and 810 cN for self-ligating and conventional brackets, respectively. When coupled with larger wires, various designs interchangeably displayed superior performance. For the 0.019- x 0.025-inch wires in the upper left quadrant, the maximum drawing forces averaged 1635 and 2080 cN for self-ligating and conventional brackets, respectively. As the malocclusion increased, the drawing forces increased. For example, in the least malocclused quadrant and with the smallest wire, maximum drawing forces for self-ligating and conventional brackets averaged 80 and 810 cN, respectively, whereas in the most malocclused quadrant tested with the same wire size, maximum drawing forces for self-ligating and conventional brackets averaged 870 and 1345 cN, respectively. For maximum values between the dry and wet states, significant differences between ambient states existed only for the In-Ovation brackets in the lower left quadrant. These test outcomes illustrated how bracket design, wire size, malocclusion, and ambient state influenced drawing forces.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15132446     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0202:EOTFRO>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  27 in total

1.  Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.

Authors:  Maria Regina Guerra Monteiro; Licinio Esmeraldo da Silva; Carlos Nelson Elias; Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Friction properties according to vertical and horizontal tooth displacement and bracket type during initial leveling and alignment.

Authors:  Wook Heo; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Relationship between friction force and orthodontic force at the leveling stage using a coated wire.

Authors:  Masaki Murayama; Yasuhiro Namura; Takahiko Tamura; Hiroaki Iwai; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Self-ligating vs conventional brackets as perceived by orthodontists.

Authors:  Chase Prettyman; Al M Best; Steven J Lindauer; Eser Tufekci
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Active and passive self-ligation: a myth? Part 1: torque control.

Authors:  Lorenz Martin Brauchli; Markus Steineck; Andrea Wichelhaus
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  A comparison of resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets under an increasing applied moment.

Authors:  Benjamin T Pliska; John P Beyer; Brent E Larson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Rates of tooth movement and bone remodeling activity: Self-ligating versus conventional brackets.

Authors:  Leonard-Euler-Andrade-Gomes do Nascimento; Matheus-Melo Pithon; Antônio-Carlos de O Ruellas; Eduardo-Sant Anna Franzotti; Antônio-Cruz-Gonçalves Filho; Margareth-Maria-Gomes de Souza; Ana-Maria Bolognese
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-04-01

8.  Role of lubricants on friction between self-ligating brackets and archwires.

Authors:  Renata C Leal; Flávia L B Amaral; Fabiana M G França; Roberta T Basting; Cecilia P Turssi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  A comparative study of initial changes in pulpal blood flow between conventional and self-ligating fixed orthodontic brackets during leveling and alignment stage.

Authors:  Elham S Abu Alhaija; Nessrin A Taha
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Effect of bracket bevel design and oral environmental factors on frictional resistance.

Authors:  Chen-Jung Chang; Tzer-Min Lee; Jia-Kuang Liu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.