Literature DB >> 15222719

Evaluation of methods of archwire ligation on frictional resistance.

Balvinder Khambay1, Declan Millett, Siobhan McHugh.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of elastomeric type and stainless steel (SS) ligation on frictional resistance using a validated method. To assess the validity of the new test system to measure mean frictional forces, SS and TMA wires, each with dimensions of 0.017 x 0.025 and 0.019 x 0.025 inches, were used in combination with a self-ligating Damon II bracket or a conventional preadjusted edgewise premolar SS bracket without ligation. Four types of elastomeric module, purple, grey, Alastik or SuperSlick, and a pre-formed 0.09 inch SS ligature were then assessed as methods of ligation using preadjusted edgewise premolar SS brackets. The specimens were tested on a Nene M3000 testing machine, with a crosshead speed of 5 mm/minute and each test run lasted for 4 minutes. Each bracket/wire combination with each method of ligation was tested 10 times in the presence of human saliva and the mean frictional force was recorded. The mean frictional forces were compared using three-way analysis of variance. The Damon II self-ligating bracket and unligated conventional SS bracket produced negligible mean frictional forces with any of the wires tested. For the 0.017 x 0.025 SS, 0.019 x 0.025 SS or 0.019 x 0.025 inch TMA wires, SS ligatures produced the lowest mean frictional forces. With the 0.017 x 0.025 TMA wire, purple modules produced the lowest mean frictional force. There was no consistent pattern in the mean frictional forces across the various combinations of wire type, size and ligation method. Under the conditions of this experiment, the use of passive self-ligating brackets is the only method of almost eliminating friction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15222719     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/26.3.327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  28 in total

1.  Traditional elastic ligatures versus slide ligation system. A morphological evaluation.

Authors:  R Condò; A Casaglia; E Armellin; S G Condò; L Cerroni
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2013-07-15

2.  Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.

Authors:  Maria Regina Guerra Monteiro; Licinio Esmeraldo da Silva; Carlos Nelson Elias; Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Friction in a hybrid system. An in vitro study.

Authors:  M Rozzi; M Mucedero; L Franchi; P Cozza
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-23

4.  Friction between Archwire of Different Sizes, Cross Section, Alloy and Brackets Ligated with Different Brands of Low Friction Elastic Ligatures- An Invitro Study.

Authors:  Bhushan Patil; Neeraj Suresh Patil; Veerendra Virupaxappa Kerudi; Shrikant Shrinivas Chitko; Amit Ratanlal Maheshwari; Harshal Ashok Patil; Nikhita Popatrao Pekhale; Pawankumar Dnyandeo Tekale
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

5.  Friction properties according to vertical and horizontal tooth displacement and bracket type during initial leveling and alignment.

Authors:  Wook Heo; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Archwire depth is a significant parameter in the frictional resistance of active and interactive, but not passive, self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Christa L Oliver; John Daskalogiannakis; Bryan D Tompson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Graziane Olímpio Pereira; Carla Maria Melleiro Gimenez; Lucas Prieto; Marcos Gabriel do Lago Prieto; Roberta Tarkany Basting
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

8.  Maxillary canine retraction with self-ligating and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Maurício Mezomo; Eduardo S de Lima; Luciane Macedo de Menezes; André Weissheimer; Susiane Allgayer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  A comparison of resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets under an increasing applied moment.

Authors:  Benjamin T Pliska; John P Beyer; Brent E Larson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Physical properties of conventional and Super Slick elastomeric ligatures after intraoral use.

Authors:  Nicola Louise Crawford; Caroline McCarthy; Tanya C Murphy; Philip Edward Benson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.