Literature DB >> 34295076

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: an Overview.

Ekta Dhamija1, Malvika Gulati1, S V S Deo2, Ajay Gogia3, Smriti Hari1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is emerging as the most common malignancy in Indian women. Mammography is one of the few screening modalities available to the modern world that has proved itself of much use by aiding early detection and treatment of non-palpable, node-negative breast cancers. However, due to its two-dimensional nature, many cases of malignancies are still missed, to be detected at a later date or by an alternate modality. In 2011, FDA approved the supplemental use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in screening and diagnostic set ups. The acquisition of multiple low-dose projection images of the compressed parenchyma provided a 'third' dimension to the mammogram whereby the breast tissue could be seen layer by layer on the workstation. It improves cancer detection rate, and reduces recall rate and false-positive findings by improving lesion characterization. The current review discusses the principle of DBT with a comprehensive study of the literature. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-021-01310-y. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast carcinoma; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Mammography; Synthesized mammogram

Year:  2021        PMID: 34295076      PMCID: PMC8272763          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-021-01310-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  76 in total

1.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach.

Authors:  Yue-Houng Hu; Bo Zhao; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Addition of tomosynthesis to conventional digital mammography: effect on image interpretation time of screening examinations.

Authors:  Pragya A Dang; Phoebe E Freer; Kathryn L Humphrey; Elkan F Halpern; Elizabeth A Rafferty
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Suspicious Findings at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Occult to Conventional Digital Mammography: Imaging Features and Pathology Findings.

Authors:  Kimberly M Ray; Estella Turner; Edward A Sickles; Bonnie N Joe
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  A failure analysis of invasive breast cancer: most deaths from disease occur in women not regularly screened.

Authors:  Matthew L Webb; Blake Cady; James S Michaelson; Devon M Bush; Katherina Zabicki Calvillo; Daniel B Kopans; Barbara L Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Changing Rates of BI-RADS Final Assessment over Time.

Authors:  Madhavi Raghu; Melissa A Durand; Liva Andrejeva; Alexander Goehler; Mark H Michalski; Jaime L Geisel; Regina J Hooley; Laura J Horvath; Reni Butler; Howard P Forman; Liane E Philpotts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Sophia Zackrisson; Kristina Lång; Aldana Rosso; Kristin Johnson; Magnus Dustler; Daniel Förnvik; Hannie Förnvik; Hanna Sartor; Pontus Timberg; Anders Tingberg; Ingvar Andersson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics.

Authors:  T M Kolb; J Lichy; J H Newhouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Characterisation of microcalcification clusters on 2D digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): does DBT underestimate microcalcification clusters? Results of a multicentre study.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Giovanna Mariscotti; Manuela Durando; Carmen Stevanin; Giulio Tagliafico; Lucia Martino; Bianca Bignotti; Massimo Calabrese; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images.

Authors:  Margarita L Zuley; Ben Guo; Victor J Catullo; Denise M Chough; Amy E Kelly; Amy H Lu; Grace Y Rathfon; Marion Lee Spangler; Jules H Sumkin; Luisa P Wallace; Andriy I Bandos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.