Literature DB >> 25018568

POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.

Edsel A Peña1, Joshua D Habiger1, Wensong Wu1.   

Abstract

Improved procedures, in terms of smaller missed discovery rates (MDR), for performing multiple hypotheses testing with weak and strong control of the family-wise error rate (FWER) or the false discovery rate (FDR) are developed and studied. The improvement over existing procedures such as the Šidák procedure for FWER control and the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) procedure for FDR control is achieved by exploiting possible differences in the powers of the individual tests. Results signal the need to take into account the powers of the individual tests and to have multiple hypotheses decision functions which are not limited to simply using the individual p-values, as is the case, for example, with the Šidák, Bonferroni, or BH procedures. They also enhance understanding of the role of the powers of individual tests, or more precisely the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) functions of decision processes, in the search for better multiple hypotheses testing procedures. A decision-theoretic framework is utilized, and through auxiliary randomizers the procedures could be used with discrete or mixed-type data or with rank-based nonparametric tests. This is in contrast to existing p-value based procedures whose theoretical validity is contingent on each of these p-value statistics being stochastically equal to or greater than a standard uniform variable under the null hypothesis. Proposed procedures are relevant in the analysis of high-dimensional "large M, small n" data sets arising in the natural, physical, medical, economic and social sciences, whose generation and creation is accelerated by advances in high-throughput technology, notably, but not limited to, microarray technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benjamini–Hochberg procedure; Bonferroni procedure; Lagrangian optimization; Neyman–Pearson most powerful test; ROC function; decision process; false discovery rate (FDR); family wise error rate (FWER); generalized multiple decision p-values; microarray analysis; missed discovery rate (MDR); multiple decision function and process; multiple hypotheses testing; optional sampling theorem; power function; randomized p-values; reverse martingale; Šidák procedure

Year:  2011        PMID: 25018568      PMCID: PMC4091923          DOI: 10.1214/10-aos844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Stat        ISSN: 0090-5364            Impact factor:   4.028


  9 in total

1.  The optimal discovery procedure for large-scale significance testing, with applications to comparative microarray experiments.

Authors:  John D Storey; James Y Dai; Jeffrey T Leek
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  A method to increase the power of multiple testing procedures through sample splitting.

Authors:  Daniel Rubin; Sandrine Dudoit; Mark van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-01

3.  Weighted multiple hypothesis testing procedures.

Authors:  Guolian Kang; Keying Ye; Nianjun Liu; David B Allison; Guimin Gao
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-04-16

4.  Using prior information to allocate significance levels for multiple endpoints.

Authors:  P H Westfall; A Krishen; S S Young
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Randomised P-values and nonparametric procedures in multiple testing.

Authors:  Joshua D Habiger; Edsel A Peña
Journal:  J Nonparametr Stat       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.231

6.  A Bayesian Discovery Procedure.

Authors:  Michele Guindani; Peter Müller; Song Zhang
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 4.488

7.  POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.

Authors:  Edsel A Peña; Joshua D Habiger; Wensong Wu
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.028

8.  Resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling generalized tail probability and expected value error rates: focus on the false discovery rate and simulation study.

Authors:  Sandrine Dudoit; Houston N Gilbert; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.207

9.  Multiple testing with minimal assumptions.

Authors:  Peter H Westfall; James F Troendle
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.207

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Compound p-value statistics for multiple testing procedures.

Authors:  Joshua D Habiger; Edsel A Peña
Journal:  J Multivar Anal       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 1.473

2.  Classes of Multiple Decision Functions Strongly Controlling FWER and FDR.

Authors:  Edsel A Peña; Joshua D Habiger; Wensong Wu
Journal:  Metrika       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 1.057

3.  Bayes multiple decision functions.

Authors:  Wensong Wu; Edsel A Peña
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.125

4.  Weighted False Discovery Rate Control in Large-Scale Multiple Testing.

Authors:  Pallavi Basu; T Tony Cai; Kiranmoy Das; Wenguang Sun
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.

Authors:  Edsel A Peña; Joshua D Habiger; Wensong Wu
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.028

6.  Weighted mining of massive collections of [Formula: see text]-values by convex optimization.

Authors:  Edgar Dobriban
Journal:  Inf inference       Date:  2017-12-08

7.  Optimal multiple testing under a Gaussian prior on the effect sizes.

Authors:  Edgar Dobriban; Kristen Fortney; Stuart K Kim; Art B Owen
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.445

8.  Data-driven hypothesis weighting increases detection power in genome-scale multiple testing.

Authors:  Nikolaos Ignatiadis; Bernd Klaus; Judith B Zaugg; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Sex-specific analysis of traumatic brain injury events: applying computational and data visualization techniques to inform prevention and management.

Authors:  Tatyana Mollayeva; Andrew Tran; Vincy Chan; Angela Colantonio; Michael D Escobar
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 4.615

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.