Literature DB >> 18932134

Multiple testing with minimal assumptions.

Peter H Westfall1, James F Troendle.   

Abstract

Resampling-based multiple testing methods that control the Familywise Error Rate in the strong sense are presented. It is shown that no assumptions whatsoever on the data-generating process are required to obtain a reasonably powerful and flexible class of multiple testing procedures. Improvements are obtained with mild assumptions. The methods are applicable to gene expression data in particular, but more generally to any multivariate, multiple group data that may be character or numeric. The role of the disputed "subset pivotality" condition is clarified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18932134      PMCID: PMC3117234          DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200710456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  2 in total

1.  Gatekeeping strategies for clinical trials that do not require all primary effects to be significant.

Authors:  Alexei Dmitrienko; Walter W Offen; Peter H Westfall
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Partitioning to uncover conditions for permutation tests to control multiple testing error rates.

Authors:  Violeta Calian; Dongmei Li; Jason C Hsu
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.207

  2 in total
  24 in total

1.  Permutational Multiple Testing Adjustments With Multivariate Multiple Group Data.

Authors:  James F Troendle; Peter H Westfall
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 1.111

2.  Independent effects of HIV, aging, and HAART on brain volumetric measures.

Authors:  Beau M Ances; Mario Ortega; Florin Vaida; Jodi Heaps; Robert Paul
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  On Permutation Procedures for Strong Control in Multiple Testing with Gene Expression Data.

Authors:  Grzegorz A Rempala; Yuhong Yang
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.582

4.  Multiple McNemar tests.

Authors:  Peter H Westfall; James F Troendle; Gene Pennello
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Randomised P-values and nonparametric procedures in multiple testing.

Authors:  Joshua D Habiger; Edsel A Peña
Journal:  J Nonparametr Stat       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.231

6.  Longitudinal metabolomic analysis of plasma enables modeling disease progression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy mouse models.

Authors:  Roula Tsonaka; Mirko Signorelli; Ekrem Sabir; Alexandre Seyer; Kristina Hettne; Annemieke Aartsma-Rus; Pietro Spitali
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Resampling-based multiple comparison procedure with application to point-wise testing with functional data.

Authors:  Olga A Vsevolozhskaya; Mark C Greenwood; Scott L Powell; Dmitri V Zaykin
Journal:  Environ Ecol Stat       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 1.119

8.  A novel permutation test for case-only analysis identifies epistatic effects on human longevity in the FOXO gene family.

Authors:  Qihua Tan; Mette Soerensen; Torben A Kruse; Kaare Christensen; Lene Christiansen
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 9.304

9.  POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.

Authors:  Edsel A Peña; Joshua D Habiger; Wensong Wu
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.028

10.  Prognostic significance of tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptor expression in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Tom M Ganten; Jaromir Sykora; Ronald Koschny; Emanuela Batke; Sebastian Aulmann; Ulrich Mansmann; Wolfgang Stremmel; Hans-Peter Sinn; Henning Walczak
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.