Literature DB >> 25076800

Compound p-value statistics for multiple testing procedures.

Joshua D Habiger1, Edsel A Peña2.   

Abstract

Many multiple testing procedures make use of the p-values from the individual pairs of hypothesis tests, and are valid if the p-value statistics are independent and uniformly distributed under the null hypotheses. However, it has recently been shown that these types of multiple testing procedures are inefficient since such p-values do not depend upon all of the available data. This paper provides tools for constructing compound p-value statistics, which are those that depend upon all of the available data, but still satisfy the conditions of independence and uniformity under the null hypotheses. Several examples are provided, including a class of compound p-value statistics for testing location shifts. It is demonstrated, both analytically and through simulations, that multiple testing procedures tend to reject more false null hypotheses when applied to these compound p-values rather than the usual p-values, and at the same time still guarantee the desired type I error rate control. The compound p-values are used to analyze a real microarray data set and allow for more rejected null hypotheses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Bayes; False discovery rate; Microarray analysis; Multiple decision function; Multiple decision process; Multiple testing; Sample splitting; Test data; Training data

Year:  2014        PMID: 25076800      PMCID: PMC4112138          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2014.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Multivar Anal        ISSN: 0047-259X            Impact factor:   1.473


  6 in total

1.  Empirical Bayes Estimates for Large-Scale Prediction Problems.

Authors:  Bradley Efron
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  A method to increase the power of multiple testing procedures through sample splitting.

Authors:  Daniel Rubin; Sandrine Dudoit; Mark van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-01

3.  Randomised P-values and nonparametric procedures in multiple testing.

Authors:  Joshua D Habiger; Edsel A Peña
Journal:  J Nonparametr Stat       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.231

4.  Genome-Wide Significance Levels and Weighted Hypothesis Testing.

Authors:  Kathryn Roeder; Larry Wasserman
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.901

5.  POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.

Authors:  Edsel A Peña; Joshua D Habiger; Wensong Wu
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.028

6.  Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior.

Authors:  Dinesh Singh; Phillip G Febbo; Kenneth Ross; Donald G Jackson; Judith Manola; Christine Ladd; Pablo Tamayo; Andrew A Renshaw; Anthony V D'Amico; Jerome P Richie; Eric S Lander; Massimo Loda; Philip W Kantoff; Todd R Golub; William R Sellers
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 31.743

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Classes of Multiple Decision Functions Strongly Controlling FWER and FDR.

Authors:  Edsel A Peña; Joshua D Habiger; Wensong Wu
Journal:  Metrika       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 1.057

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.