Literature DB >> 25419090

Randomised P-values and nonparametric procedures in multiple testing.

Joshua D Habiger1, Edsel A Peña1.   

Abstract

The validity of many multiple hypothesis testing procedures for false discovery rate (FDR) control relies on the assumption that P-value statistics are uniformly distributed under the null hypotheses. However, this assumption fails if the test statistics have discrete distributions or if the distributional model for the observables is misspecified. A stochastic process framework is introduced that, with the aid of a uniform variate, admits P-value statistics to satisfy the uniformity condition even when test statistics have discrete distributions. This allows nonparametric tests to be used to generate P-value statistics satisfying the uniformity condition. The resulting multiple testing procedures are therefore endowed with robustness properties. Simulation studies suggest that nonparametric randomised test P-values allow for these FDR methods to perform better when the model for the observables is nonparametric or misspecified.

Entities:  

Keywords:  P-value statistics; false discovery rate; microarray; multiple testing; randomisation

Year:  2011        PMID: 25419090      PMCID: PMC4239670          DOI: 10.1080/10485252.2010.482154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nonparametr Stat        ISSN: 1026-7654            Impact factor:   1.231


  6 in total

1.  Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Alan E Hubbard
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2006-05-21

2.  Myogenic gene expression signature establishes that brown and white adipocytes originate from distinct cell lineages.

Authors:  James A Timmons; Kristian Wennmalm; Ola Larsson; Tomas B Walden; Timo Lassmann; Natasa Petrovic; D Lee Hamilton; Ruth E Gimeno; Claes Wahlestedt; Keith Baar; Jan Nedergaard; Barbara Cannon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Exploring the information in p-values for the analysis and planning of multiple-test experiments.

Authors:  David Ruppert; Dan Nettleton; J T Gene Hwang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Weighted multiplicity adjustments for animal carcinogenicity tests.

Authors:  P H Westfall; K A Soper
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.051

5.  A modified Bonferroni method for discrete data.

Authors:  R E Tarone
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Multiple testing with minimal assumptions.

Authors:  Peter H Westfall; James F Troendle
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.207

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Compound p-value statistics for multiple testing procedures.

Authors:  Joshua D Habiger; Edsel A Peña
Journal:  J Multivar Anal       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 1.473

2.  Classes of Multiple Decision Functions Strongly Controlling FWER and FDR.

Authors:  Edsel A Peña; Joshua D Habiger; Wensong Wu
Journal:  Metrika       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 1.057

3.  POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.

Authors:  Edsel A Peña; Joshua D Habiger; Wensong Wu
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.028

4.  A non-randomized procedure for large-scale heterogeneous multiple discrete testing based on randomized tests.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Dai; Nan Lin; Daofeng Li; Ting Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Spike-Centered Jitter Can Mistake Temporal Structure.

Authors:  Jonathan Platkiewicz; Eran Stark; Asohan Amarasingham
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Meta-Analysis of Mid-p-Values: Some New Results based on the Convex Order.

Authors:  Patrick Rubin-Delanchy; Nicholas A Heard; Daniel J Lawson
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  The role of gene to gene interaction in the breast's genomic signature of pregnancy.

Authors:  Pedro J Gutiérrez-Díez; Javier Gomez-Pilar; Roberto Hornero; Julia Martínez-Rodríguez; Miguel A López-Marcos; Jose Russo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.