Literature DB >> 25016936

A comparative study of oxygen diffusion in tissue engineering scaffolds.

T Fiedler1, I V Belova, G E Murch, G Poologasundarampillai, J R Jones, J A Roether, A R Boccaccini.   

Abstract

Tissue engineering scaffolds are designed to support tissue self-healing within physiological environments by promoting the attachment, growth and differentiation of relevant cells. Newly formed tissue must be supplied with sufficient levels of oxygen to prevent necrosis. Oxygen diffusion is the major transport mechanism before vascularization is completed and oxygen is predominantly supplied via blood vessels. The present study compares different designs for scaffolds in the context of their oxygen diffusion ability. In all cases, oxygen diffusion is confined to the scaffold pores that are assumed to be completely occupied by newly formed tissue. The solid phase of the scaffolds acts as diffusion barrier that locally inhibits oxygen diffusion, i.e. no oxygen passes through the scaffold material. As a result, the oxygen diffusivity is determined by the scaffold porosity and pore architecture. Lattice Monte Carlo simulations are performed to compare the normalized oxygen diffusivities in scaffolds obtained by the foam replication (FR) method, robocasting and sol-gel foaming. Scaffolds made by the FR method were found to have the highest oxygen diffusivity due to their high porosity and interconnected pores. These structures enable the best oxygen supply for newly formed tissue among the scaffold types considered according to the present numerical predictions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25016936     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5264-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  16 in total

Review 1.  Third-generation biomedical materials.

Authors:  Larry L Hench; Julia M Polak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The measurement of the diffusion of oxygen through respiring tissue.

Authors:  I S LONGMUIR; A BOURKE
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1960-08       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 3.  Diffusion in musculoskeletal tissue engineering scaffolds: design issues related to porosity, permeability, architecture, and nutrient mixing.

Authors:  Tejas S Karande; Joo L Ong; C Mauli Agrawal
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Diffusion in three-dimensionally ordered scaffolds with inverted colloidal crystal geometry.

Authors:  Sachin Shanbhag; Jung Woo Lee; Nicholas Kotov
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Analysis of cell growth and diffusion in a scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  C A Chung; C W Yang; C W Chen
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  State of the art and future directions of scaffold-based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective.

Authors:  Dietmar Werner Hutmacher; Jan Thorsten Schantz; Christopher Xu Fu Lam; Kim Cheng Tan; Thiam Chye Lim
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.963

Review 7.  Effect of bioactive glasses on angiogenesis: a review of in vitro and in vivo evidences.

Authors:  Alejandro A Gorustovich; Judith A Roether; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 8.  Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids.

Authors:  Julian R Jones
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.

Authors:  Caroline A Schneider; Wayne S Rasband; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  The diffusion coefficient of oxygen in respiring kidney and tumour tissue.

Authors:  N T Evans; P F Naylor; T H Quinton
Journal:  Respir Physiol       Date:  1981-03
View more
  6 in total

1.  Bioprinted osteon-like scaffolds enhance in vivo neovascularization.

Authors:  Charlotte Piard; Hannah Baker; Timur Kamalitdinov; John Fisher
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 9.954

2.  Collagen hydrogel scaffold promotes mesenchymal stem cell and endothelial cell coculture for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Bao-Ngoc B Nguyen; Rebecca A Moriarty; Tim Kamalitdinov; Julie M Etheridge; John P Fisher
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Oxygen diffusion in marine-derived tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  E Boccardi; I V Belova; G E Murch; A R Boccaccini; T Fiedler
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Hypoxic culture of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal stem cells differentially enhances in vitro chondrogenesis within cell-seeded collagen and hyaluronic acid porous scaffolds.

Authors:  Troy D Bornes; Nadr M Jomha; Aillette Mulet-Sierra; Adetola B Adesida
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 6.832

5.  Bioprinted hASC-laden collagen/HA constructs with meringue-like macro/micropores.

Authors:  YoungWon Koo; Geun Hyung Kim
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2022-04-28

6.  Investigations of Fused Deposition Modeling for Perovskite Active Solar Cells.

Authors:  Leland Weiss; Tyler Sonsalla
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.329

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.