Literature DB >> 30769337

Bioprinted osteon-like scaffolds enhance in vivo neovascularization.

Charlotte Piard1, Hannah Baker, Timur Kamalitdinov, John Fisher.   

Abstract

Bone tissue engineers are facing a daunting challenge when attempting to fabricate bigger constructs intended for use in the treatment of large bone defects, which is the vascularization of the graft. Cell-based approaches and, in particular, the use of in vitro coculture of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) has been one of the most explored options. We present in this paper an alternative method to mimic the spatial pattern of HUVECs and hMSCs found in native osteons based on the use of extrusion-based 3D bioprinting (3DP). We developed a 3DP biphasic osteon-like scaffold, containing two separate osteogenic and vasculogenic cell populations encapsulated in a fibrin bioink in order to improve neovascularization. To this end, we optimized the fibrin bioink to improve the resolution of printed strands and ensure a reproducible printing process; the influence of printing parameters on extruded strand diameter and cell survival was also investigated. The mechanical strength of the construct was improved by co-printing the fibrin bioink along a supporting PCL carrier scaffold. Compressive mechanical testing showed improved mechanical properties with an average compressive modulus of 131 ± 23 MPa, which falls in the range of cortical bone. HUVEC and hMSC laden fibrin hydrogels were printed in osteon-like patterns and cultured in vitro. A significant increase in gene expression of angiogenic markers was observed for the biomimetic scaffolds. Finally, biphasic scaffolds were implanted subcutaneously in rats. Histological analysis of explanted scaffolds showed a significant increase in the number of blood vessels per area in the 3D printed osteon-like scaffolds. The utilization of these scaffolds in constructing biomimetic osteons for bone regeneration demonstrated a promising capacity to improve neovascularization of the construct. These results indicates that proper cell orientation and scaffold design could play a critical role in neovascularization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30769337      PMCID: PMC7195919          DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab078a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  30 in total

1.  A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity.

Authors:  Hyun-Wook Kang; Sang Jin Lee; In Kap Ko; Carlos Kengla; James J Yoo; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis.

Authors:  Vassilis Karageorgiou; David Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  Gerald Zimmermann; Arash Moghaddam
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Paracrine effects influenced by cell culture medium and consequences on microvessel-like structures in cocultures of mesenchymal stem cells and outgrowth endothelial cells.

Authors:  Marlen Kolbe; Zhou Xiang; Eva Dohle; Marcus Tonak; Charles James Kirkpatrick; Sabine Fuchs
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Collagen hydrogel scaffold promotes mesenchymal stem cell and endothelial cell coculture for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Bao-Ngoc B Nguyen; Rebecca A Moriarty; Tim Kamalitdinov; Julie M Etheridge; John P Fisher
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Enhanced osteogenesis in cocultures with human mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells on polymeric microfiber scaffolds.

Authors:  Julia G Gershovich; Rebecca L Dahlin; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Fibrin-based 3D matrices induce angiogenic behavior of adipose-derived stem cells.

Authors:  Eunna Chung; Julie A Rytlewski; Arjun G Merchant; Kabir S Dhada; Evan W Lewis; Laura J Suggs
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 8.  Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering.

Authors:  P A Gunatillake; R Adhikari
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 3.942

9.  Interactions of human endothelial and multipotent mesenchymal stem cells in cocultures.

Authors:  Christina Ern; Vera Krump-Konvalinkova; Denitsa Docheva; Stefanie Schindler; Oliver Rossmann; Wolfgang Böcker; Wolf Mutschler; Matthias Schieker
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2010-10-11

10.  Design and Fabrication of 3D printed Scaffolds with a Mechanical Strength Comparable to Cortical Bone to Repair Large Bone Defects.

Authors:  Seyed-Iman Roohani-Esfahani; Peter Newman; Hala Zreiqat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  14 in total

1.  3D printed HUVECs/MSCs cocultures impact cellular interactions and angiogenesis depending on cell-cell distance.

Authors:  Charlotte Piard; Anjana Jeyaram; Yi Liu; John Caccamese; Steven M Jay; Yu Chen; John Fisher
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Biomaterials for Bioprinting Microvasculature.

Authors:  Ryan W Barrs; Jia Jia; Sophia E Silver; Michael Yost; Ying Mei
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Systematic review on the application of 3D-bioprinting technology in orthoregeneration: current achievements and open challenges.

Authors:  Rachel L Pan; Kari Martyniak; Makan Karimzadeh; David G Gelikman; Jonathan DeVries; Kelly Sutter; Melanie Coathup; Mehdi Razavi; Rajendra Sawh-Martinez; Thomas J Kean
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-09-19

Review 4.  From 3D printing to 3D bioprinting: the material properties of polymeric material and its derived bioink for achieving tissue specific architectures.

Authors:  Nihal Engin Vrana; Sharda Gupta; Kunal Mitra; Albert A Rizvanov; Valeriya V Solovyeva; Ezgi Antmen; Majid Salehi; Arian Ehterami; Lea Pourchet; Julien Barthes; Christophe A Marquette; Magnus von Unge; Chi-Yun Wang; Po-Liang Lai; Arindam Bit
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 1.752

5.  Fabrication of centimeter-sized 3D constructs with patterned endothelial cells through assembly of cell-laden microbeads as a potential bone graft.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Bhushan Mahadik; Ji Young Choi; Justine R Yu; Trevor Mollot; Bin Jiang; Xiaoming He; John P Fisher
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 6.  3D Bioprinting of Vascularized Tissues for in vitro and in vivo Applications.

Authors:  Earnest P Chen; Zeren Toksoy; Bruce A Davis; John P Geibel
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-05-13

Review 7.  Osteon: Structure, Turnover, and Regeneration.

Authors:  Bei Chang; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 7.376

8.  Tripolyphosphate-Crosslinked Chitosan/Gelatin Biocomposite Ink for 3D Printing of Uniaxial Scaffolds.

Authors:  Tiziana Fischetti; Nehar Celikkin; Nicola Contessi Negrini; Silvia Farè; Wojciech Swieszkowski
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-30

Review 9.  Engineered 3D Polymer and Hydrogel Microenvironments for Cell Culture Applications.

Authors:  Daniel Fan; Urs Staufer; Angelo Accardo
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-13

Review 10.  Utilization of Carbon Nanotubes in Manufacturing of 3D Cartilage and Bone Scaffolds.

Authors:  Tomasz Szymański; Adam Aron Mieloch; Magdalena Richter; Tomasz Trzeciak; Ewa Florek; Jakub Dalibor Rybka; Michael Giersig
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.