Literature DB >> 26111951

Oxygen diffusion in marine-derived tissue engineering scaffolds.

E Boccardi1, I V Belova, G E Murch, A R Boccaccini, T Fiedler.   

Abstract

This paper addresses the computation of the effective diffusivity in new bioactive glass (BG) based tissue engineering scaffolds. High diffusivities facilitate the supply of oxygen and nutrients to grown tissue as well as the rapid disposal of toxic waste products. The present study addresses required novel types of bone tissue engineering BG scaffolds that are derived from natural marine sponges. Using the foam replication method, the scaffold geometry is defined by the porous structure of Spongia Agaricina and Spongia Lamella. These sponges present the advantage of attaining scaffolds with higher mechanical properties (2-4 MPa) due to a decrease in porosity (68-76%). The effective diffusivities of these structures are compared with that of conventional scaffolds based on polyurethane (PU) foam templates, characterised by high porosity (>90%) and lower mechanical properties (>0.05 MPa). Both the spatial and directional variations of diffusivity are investigated. Furthermore, the effect of scaffold decomposition due to immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF) on the diffusivity is addressed. Scaffolds based on natural marine sponges are characterised by lower oxygen diffusivity due to their lower porosity compared with the PU replica foams, which should enable the best oxygen supply to newly formed bone according the numerical results. The oxygen diffusivity of these new BG scaffolds increases over time as a consequence of the degradation in SBF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26111951     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-015-5531-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  14 in total

1.  Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage.

Authors:  D W Hutmacher
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors.

Authors:  S Yang; K F Leong; Z Du; C K Chua
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2001-12

3.  The story of Bioglass.

Authors:  Larry L Hench
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?

Authors:  Tadashi Kokubo; Hiroaki Takadama
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Role of scaffold internal structure on in vivo bone formation in macroporous calcium phosphate bioceramics.

Authors:  Maddalena Mastrogiacomo; Silvia Scaglione; Roberta Martinetti; Laura Dolcini; Francesco Beltrame; Ranieri Cancedda; Rodolfo Quarto
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Effect of bioactive glasses on angiogenesis: a review of in vitro and in vivo evidences.

Authors:  Alejandro A Gorustovich; Judith A Roether; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 7.  Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids.

Authors:  Julian R Jones
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Surface-active biomaterials.

Authors:  L L Hench; J Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-11-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  45S5 Bioglass-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Qizhi Z Chen; Ian D Thompson; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  A comparative study of oxygen diffusion in tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  T Fiedler; I V Belova; G E Murch; G Poologasundarampillai; J R Jones; J A Roether; A R Boccaccini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.896

View more
  1 in total

1.  Osteogenic cell response to 3-D hydroxyapatite scaffolds developed via replication of natural marine sponges.

Authors:  S A Clarke; S Y Choi; Melanie McKechnie; G Burke; N Dunne; G Walker; E Cunningham; F Buchanan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.896

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.