Elias S Hyams1, Manoj Monga2, Margaret S Pearle3, Jodi A Antonelli3, Michelle J Semins4, Dean G Assimos5, James E Lingeman6, Vernon M Pais1, Glenn M Preminger7, Michael E Lipkin7, Brian H Eisner8, Ojas Shah9, Roger L Sur10, Patrick W Mufarrij11, Brian R Matlaga12. 1. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. 2. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio. 3. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 4. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 6. Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana. 7. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 8. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 9. New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York. 10. University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California. 11. George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, D.C. 12. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: bmatlaga@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Flexible ureteroscopy is rapidly becoming a first line therapy for many patients with renal and ureteral stones. However, current understanding of treatment outcomes in patients with isolated proximal ureteral stones is limited. Therefore, we performed a prospective, multi-institutional study of ureteroscopic management of proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm to better define clinical outcomes associated with this approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients with proximal ureteral calculi smaller than 2 cm were prospectively identified. Patients with concomitant ipsilateral renal calculi or prior ureteral stenting were excluded from study. Flexible ureteroscopy, holmium laser lithotripsy and ureteral stent placement was performed. Ureteral access sheath use, laser settings and other details of perioperative and postoperative management were based on individual surgeon preference. Stone clearance was determined by the results of renal ultrasound and plain x-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Of 71 patients 44 (62%) were male and 27 (38%) were female. Mean age was 48.2 years. ASA(®) score was 1 in 12 cases (16%), 2 in 41 (58%), 3 in 16 (23%) and 4 in 2 (3%). Mean body mass index was 31.8 kg/m(2), mean stone size was 7.4 mm (range 5 to 15) and mean operative time was 60.3 minutes (range 15 to 148). Intraoperative complications occurred in 2 patients (2.8%), including mild ureteral trauma. Postoperative complications developed in 6 patients (8.7%), including urinary tract infection in 3, urinary retention in 2 and flash pulmonary edema in 1. The stone-free rate was 95% and for stones smaller than 1 cm it was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible ureteroscopy is associated with excellent clinical outcomes and acceptable morbidity when applied to patients with proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm.
PURPOSE: Flexible ureteroscopy is rapidly becoming a first line therapy for many patients with renal and ureteral stones. However, current understanding of treatment outcomes in patients with isolated proximal ureteral stones is limited. Therefore, we performed a prospective, multi-institutional study of ureteroscopic management of proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm to better define clinical outcomes associated with this approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients with proximal ureteral calculi smaller than 2 cm were prospectively identified. Patients with concomitant ipsilateral renal calculi or prior ureteral stenting were excluded from study. Flexible ureteroscopy, holmium laser lithotripsy and ureteral stent placement was performed. Ureteral access sheath use, laser settings and other details of perioperative and postoperative management were based on individual surgeon preference. Stone clearance was determined by the results of renal ultrasound and plain x-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Of 71 patients 44 (62%) were male and 27 (38%) were female. Mean age was 48.2 years. ASA(®) score was 1 in 12 cases (16%), 2 in 41 (58%), 3 in 16 (23%) and 4 in 2 (3%). Mean body mass index was 31.8 kg/m(2), mean stone size was 7.4 mm (range 5 to 15) and mean operative time was 60.3 minutes (range 15 to 148). Intraoperative complications occurred in 2 patients (2.8%), including mild ureteral trauma. Postoperative complications developed in 6 patients (8.7%), including urinary tract infection in 3, urinary retention in 2 and flash pulmonary edema in 1. The stone-free rate was 95% and for stones smaller than 1 cm it was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible ureteroscopy is associated with excellent clinical outcomes and acceptable morbidity when applied to patients with proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm.
Authors: Dorit E Zilberman; Michael E Lipkin; Michael N Ferrandino; Walter Neal Simmons; John G Mancini; Maria E Raymundo; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger Journal: J Endourol Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Enrique Perez Castro; Palle J S Osther; Viorel Jinga; Hassan Razvi; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Kandarp Parikh; Ali R Kural; Jean J de la Rosette Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Jason Skenazy; Barbara Ercole; Courtney Lee; Sara Best; Elizabeth Fallon; Manoj Monga Journal: J Endourol Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Margaret S Pearle; James E Lingeman; Raymond Leveillee; Ramsay Kuo; Glenn M Preminger; Robert B Nadler; Joseph Macaluso; Manoj Monga; Udaya Kumar; John Dushinski; David M Albala; J Stuart Wolf; Dean Assimos; Michael Fabrizio; Larry C Munch; Stephen Y Nakada; Brian Auge; John Honey; Kenneth Ogan; John Pattaras; Elspeth M McDougall; Timothy D Averch; Thomas Turk; Paul Pietrow; Stephanie Watkins Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Gastón Astroza; Manuel Catalán; Lucas Consigliere; Tomás Selman; José Salvadó; Francisco Rubilar Journal: Cent European J Urol Date: 2016-12-28
Authors: Fabio C M Torricelli; Manoj Monga; Giovanni S Marchini; Miguel Srougi; William C Nahas; Eduardo Mazzucchi Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2016 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.541