Literature DB >> 26535802

Kidney stones: flexible ureteroscopy.

Timothy Y Tseng1, Glenn M Preminger.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The age of peak incidence for stone disease is 20 to 40 years, although stones are seen in all age groups. There is a male to female ratio of 3:2. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of flexible ureteroscopy for the removal of renal stones? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2014 (Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview).
RESULTS: At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 197 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 118 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 99 studies and the further review of 18 full publications. Of the 18 full articles evaluated, one systematic review and four RCTs were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for eight PICO combinations.
CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for four interventions, based on information relating to the effectiveness and safety of: flexible ureteroscopy (combined with snare or basket or laser lithotripsy) versus expectant management, flexible ureteroscopy (combined with snare or basket or laser lithotripsy) versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy (combined with snare or basket or laser lithotripsy) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26535802      PMCID: PMC4632914     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid        ISSN: 1462-3846


  10 in total

Review 1.  The first kidney stone.

Authors:  J Uribarri; M S Oh; H J Carroll
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter.

Authors:  Piotr Bryniarski; Andrzej Paradysz; Marcin Zyczkowski; Andrzej Kupilas; Krzysztof Nowakowski; Rafał Bogacki
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  The natural history of asymptomatic urolithiasis.

Authors:  L S Glowacki; M L Beecroft; R J Cook; D Pahl; D N Churchill
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery monotherapy versus shock wave lithotripsy for stones 10 to 20 mm in preschool children: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Ibrahim A Mokhless; Hussein M Abdeldaeim; Ashraf Saad; Abdel Rahman Zahran
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of small renal calculi: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ravindra B Sabnis; Raguram Ganesamoni; Amit Doshi; Arvind P Ganpule; Jitendra Jagtap; Mahesh R Desai
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 6.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.

Authors:  Attasit Srisubat; Somkiat Potisat; Bannakij Lojanapiwat; Vasun Setthawong; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-24

7.  Changing gender prevalence of stone disease.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Lesley H Curtis; Regina D Norris; W Patrick Springhart; Roger L Sur; Kevin A Schulman; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.

Authors:  Margaret S Pearle; James E Lingeman; Raymond Leveillee; Ramsay Kuo; Glenn M Preminger; Robert B Nadler; Joseph Macaluso; Manoj Monga; Udaya Kumar; John Dushinski; David M Albala; J Stuart Wolf; Dean Assimos; Michael Fabrizio; Larry C Munch; Stephen Y Nakada; Brian Auge; John Honey; Kenneth Ogan; John Pattaras; Elspeth M McDougall; Timothy D Averch; Thomas Turk; Paul Pietrow; Stephanie Watkins
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The case for a more aggressive approach to staghorn stones.

Authors:  J P Blandy; M Singh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  A prospective, multi-institutional study of flexible ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Manoj Monga; Margaret S Pearle; Jodi A Antonelli; Michelle J Semins; Dean G Assimos; James E Lingeman; Vernon M Pais; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin; Brian H Eisner; Ojas Shah; Roger L Sur; Patrick W Mufarrij; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 7.450

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.