Literature DB >> 30325601

Anterograde irrigation - assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy in patients with percutaneous nephrostomy.

Jemo Yoo1, Seung-Ju Lee1, Hyun-Sop Choe1, Hee Youn Kim1, Joon Ho Lee1, Dong Sup Lee1.   

Abstract

In complicated urinary tract infection with ureteral calculi, urinary diversion is inevitable. So, stenting or percutaneous drainage can be an option. In hemodynamically unstable patients, percutaneous drainage is superior to ureteral stenting (1). Once acute infection is controlled, definite treatment of the stone is necessary. According to a guideline, semirigid ureteroscopy is recommended for lower and mid - ureter stone and flexible ureteroscopy for upper ureter stone (2). Semi - rigid ureteroscopy can migrate stone to kidney, especially in upper ureter stone, lowering stone free rate (3). Not only flexible ureteroscopy creates additional costs but also is barely available in developing countries (4, 5). So, the authors would like to introduce anterograde irrigation - assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy in patients with percutaneous nephrostomy. Retrograde irrigation was connected and flowed minimally enough to secure visual field. Once stone is noted, another saline irrigation, which is placed above 40 cm over the patient is connected to nephrostomy. Retrograde irrigation is disconnected from ureteroscope and the previous connected channel on ureteroscope is opened. Actual pressure detected by barometer from the opened channel of ureteroscope is usually about 30 cmH2O while anterograde irrigation is administered in maximal flow, which means fully opened anterograde irrigation is not hazardous to kidney. There was no complication in 17 patients submitted to this method. Video shows advantages of our practice: clear visual field; reduced risk of stone migration into kidney; induced spontaneous passage of fragments without using instrumentation; and decreased operation time. In short, most of surgeons, even unexperienced, can perform an excellent procedure with less time consuming using our method. Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30325601      PMCID: PMC6541133          DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


ARTICLE INFO

Available at: Int Braz J Urol. 2019; 45 (video #5): 406-7
  5 in total

1.  Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteral stents for diversion of hydronephrosis caused by stones: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  H Mokhmalji; P M Braun; F J Martinez Portillo; M Siegsmund; P Alken; K U Köhrmann
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I.

Authors:  Dean Assimos; Amy Krambeck; Nicole L Miller; Manoj Monga; M Hassan Murad; Caleb P Nelson; Kenneth T Pace; Vernon M Pais; Margaret S Pearle; Glenn M Preminger; Hassan Razvi; Ojas Shah; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  A prospective, multi-institutional study of flexible ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Manoj Monga; Margaret S Pearle; Jodi A Antonelli; Michelle J Semins; Dean G Assimos; James E Lingeman; Vernon M Pais; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin; Brian H Eisner; Ojas Shah; Roger L Sur; Patrick W Mufarrij; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.

Authors:  Silvia Proietti; Laurian Dragos; Wilson Molina; Steeve Doizi; Guido Giusti; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Jiachao Guo; Henglong Hu; Yuchao Lu; Jiaqiao Zhang; Baolong Qin; Yufeng Wang; Zongbiao Zhang; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of anti-retropulsive devices varies according to the locations of proximal ureteral stones: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Weisong Wu; Jiaqiao Zhang; Rixiati Yi; Xianmiu Li; Xiao Yu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.264

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.